text here. Few sentances.PROS
List, of, prosCONS
List, of cons
The concept is simple: You request an insured envelope from Cash4Gold; place your gold, silver or platinum jewelry in the mail and wait for a check or electronic payment. Unfortunately, credible review organizations say it doesn't always work that smoothly. The Better Business Bureau (BBB) has collected hundreds of consumer complaints about Cash4Gold.
"There appears to be a serious problem with packages sent to Cash4Gold not being received," the BBB states. Cash4Gold includes $100 mail insurance with its prepaid envelope -- $500 if you use FedEx -- but if you send items worth more than that, the BBB recommends buying your own mail insurance and using a courier service with delivery confirmation.Pros
When a reporter for KSL in Salt Lake City, Utah, tested Cash4Gold by sending $60 worth of gold jewelry, Cash4Gold offers just $9.58 for the shipment. "Good Morning America" conducted a similar experiment; Cash4Gold offered $66.05 for $410 worth of gold. In both cases, local gold buyers offered far more for the same gold, much closer to market value. In the "Good Morning America" test, Cash4Gold doubles its offer when the reporter asks for her jewelry back. ConsumerReports.org says its test yielded similar low offers from the three gold-redemption companies it tested, including Cash4Gold.
Cash4Gold says it will return items to customers who reject the payment as too low -- but only if you request the return within 12 days of the date Cash4Gold issues its check. If you select direct deposit instead of a check, you waive the return policy.
Credible broadcast and print sources have evaluated Cash4Gold. ConsumerReports.org and "Inside Edition" both conduct tests by sending pre-appraised gold to Cash4Gold and documenting the resulting offers. ABC's "Good Morning America" and several other TV stations do the same. The Better Business Bureau's website provides a clear summary of customer complaints. ComplaintsBoard.com posts dozens of complaints, but there is no way of verifying that the complaints are all written by real consumers. The Consumerist, a blog affiliated with the not-for-profit Consumers Union (publisher of ConsumerReports.org), includes a post by a fired Cash4Gold employee alleging that the company is a scam -- along with a lawsuit filed by Cash4Gold in response and a follow-up investigative article that supports the former employee's claims.
Cashing in Gold? Here's the Catch, Editors of ConsumerReports.org, Nov. 2009
In this review, ConsumerReports.org editors send identical pieces of gold jewelry to several different online gold-redemption companies (including Cash4Gold) and compare payments to local jewelry store and pawn-shop prices. All the cash-for-gold companies offer far less money than the local options. ConsumerReports.org offers helpful tips for avoiding getting scammed when selling gold.
BBB Reliability Report for Cash 4 Gold, Editors of Better Business Bureau
This page summarizes the hundreds of complaints the Better Business Bureau has received about Cash4Gold. They give the Florida-based Cash4Gold a C rating, which is up from a D-minus it received in 2009. The BBB has revoked Cash4Gold's membership in the Bureau, as well.
Gold Rush: People Rush to Sell Gold Instead of Finding It, Elisabeth Leamy and Vanessa Weber, March 20, 2009
"Good Morning America" tests three mail-in gold companies by sending $350 worth of gold. Cash4Gold offers the lowest price: $66.05. When the journalists ask for their gold back, Cash4Gold doubles the offer. This article provides a wealth of advice for consumers considering selling their gold to a mail-in company.
Cash4Gold's Superbowl Ad, Editors of Inside Edition, Feb. 4, 2009
Syndicated TV newsmagazine "Inside Edition" conducts an investigative report, sending gold valued at around $1,000 to Cash4Gold. They receive an offer of around $200, which is doubled to $400 when they call to get the pieces back.
KSL Investigation: Putting Money-for-Gold Offers to the Test, Debbie Dujanovic, March 5, 2009
A reporter at this NBC affiliate conducts an investigation of mail-in gold companies, similar to the one later conducted by "Good Morning America." She sends $60 worth of gold to Cash4Gold and is offered $9.58 in return. Like the "Good Morning America" reporters, this reviewer gets a better offer from a local buyer, and she offers a list of tips for consumers.
The Article Cash4Gold Doesn't Want You To Read, Ben Popken, Sept. 2, 2009
After publishing its "10 Confessions of a Cash4Gold Employee" article, Consumerist.com (whose parent company is a subsidiary of Consumers Union, publisher of ConsumerReports.org) publishes this investigative article on Cash4Gold's business practices, sending in gold after having it appraised. All the mail-in gold companies offered amounts lower than market value, but Cash4Gold's was "the lowest amounts of any firm."
10 Confessions of a Cash4Gold Employee, Ben Popken, Feb. 2, 2009
The Consumerist.com blog publishes this post from a former employee of Cash4Gold, outlining the various steps in what the former worker describes as the "Cash 4 Gold Scam." Cash4Gold filed a defamation lawsuit against this former employee and Consumerist.com posted a long feature investigative article backing up the employee's claims. Both are linked here.
Cash4Gold Complaints, Contributors to ComplaintsBoard.com
This website posts dozens of complaints written by consumers say they were ripped off by Cash4Gold, although there is no way to confirm their complaints. Posts include the original fired-employee posting (discussed in the above review) and a response from Cash4Gold CEO Jeff Aronson.
text here. Few sentances.PROS
List, of, prosCONS
List, of cons
A reporter at WVEC in Norfolk, Va., tries out the Swivel Store and says it works well; however, a reviewer at KVUE in Austin, Tex., complains that it doesn't fit into short cabinets or accommodate large bottles. Reviewers on Amazon.com have mixed reviews. Those who have tall cabinets and try to store smaller containers give the Swivel Store positive remarks; those with small cabinets and bulky bottles say it doesn't work. Reviewers on Walmart.com echo these comments.
Does it Work? Swivel Store, Sandra Parker, Aug. 23, 2011
Reporter Sandra Parker tests the Swivel Store with a viewer. They say it is simple to use; the shelves slide out easily and feel very sturdy, and they like how neatly all of their spice containers are displayed. For the product to work properly, the two note that containers should be evenly distributed to avoid it tipping over.
Does It Work? The Swivel Store, Quita Culpepper, Updated Sept. 15, 2011
Reporter Quita Culpepper tries the Swivel Store in her home and is frustrated that it doesn't fit in her kitchen cabinets. Placed on an open shelf, Culpepper finds that it does slide and swivel, allowing her to easily locate the spices she's looking for. When asked to give it a thumbs up or down, Culpepper gives the Swivel Store a thumb "in the middle," saying it does work, but only in cabinets that are tall enough and only with bottles that are the right size.
Try It Review: Swivel Store spice rack, Karyn Greer, Sept. 7, 2011
Karyn Greer tests the Swivel Store at the home of a local viewer. The kitchen cabinet is tall enough to accommodate the Swivel Store, but some taller and wider bottles don't fit. Once inside the cabinet, the Swivel Store easily slides and swivels, making finding her spices a snap. The homeowner gives the Swivel Store two thumbs up.
Swivel Store Organizer Storage System, Contributors to Amazon.com
Over 50 customers review the Swivel Store on Amazon.com, and their reviews are mixed. Satisfied customers find it a simple solution to keeping their spices organized. Unhappy owners say the Swivel Store only fits inside tall cabinets and that larger bottles don't fit on the shelves. A few also comment that they find the plastic to be a bit flimsy.
As Seen on TV Swivel Store Organizer, Contributors to Walmart.com
Almost 30 customers review the Swivel Store on Walmart.com, and the majority of them say they would recommend the product. Positive and negative reviews mirror those found at other sources.