
Since we debuted our cheap-digital-camera report in August, we've come across a number of sub-$200 cameras, both good and bad. So if you didn't get the digital camera you craved over the holidays this year, you'll be glad to know you don't have to spend much to buy one yourself. Of course, the cheapest of cheap cameras tend to be just that -- poorly constructed, feature starved and just not very good at what cameras do: taking pictures.
Our cheap digital camera report names three Canon point-and-shoots as the top picks, but we've since found models from Kodak, Nikon and Sony that are viable alternatives. (Those same companies also make some duds.)
Here's what to buy and what to avoid.
BEST BETS:
SKIP THESE:
|
Sponsored Links are keyword-targeted advertisements provided through the Google AdWords™ program. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by Google. For information about these Google ads, go to adwords.google.com. Google may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your Web browser. Information from this cookie may be used by Google to help provide advertisers with more targeted advertising opportunities. For more information about Google's privacy policy, including how to opt out, go to www.google.com/ads/preferences. By clicking on Sponsored Links you will leave ConsumerSearch.com. The web site you will go to is not endorsed by ConsumerSearch. |