Page: 4 of 4
In this report
Blood Pressure Monitors: Ratings of Sources
Total of 15 Sources
1. ConsumerReports.org
Oct. 2010
Blood-Pressure Monitor Ratings
by Editors of ConsumerReports.org
Our AssessmentConsumerReports.org reviews 13 top-selling automatic blood pressure monitors for accuracy and consistency. The report stresses the importance of buying an accurate unit because at-home monitoring can help people manage blood pressure and diabetes. This is the largest test we found of specific models, but only subscribers can read this report, and four of the top picks have been discontinued.
2. Choice magazine
July 7, 2010
Blood Pressure Monitors: Review and Compare
by Matthew Steen
Our AssessmentEditors at Choice magazine, an Australian publication similar to ConsumerReports.org, test 14 automatic blood pressure monitors and rate them on accuracy, ease of use, comfort and other factors. A detailed comparison chart is included. Only two of four recommended models are available in the U.S., however. Additional sections include a description of features to look for, information on managing high blood pressure and how to measure blood pressure.
3. British Hypertension Society
As of May 2011
Validated Blood Pressure Monitors
by Editors of British Hypertension Society
Our AssessmentAlthough the nonprofit British Hypertension Society (BHS) doesn't test blood pressure monitors itself, it provides lists of various types of units that have been tested by others using BHS or other well-accepted protocols. Only devices that have been tested and have achieved a grade of at least "B" for systolic and diastolic measurements are listed. Different monitors for clinical and home use are listed, with arm and wrist units being described as suitable for home use. However, the BHS says arm blood pressure monitors are recommended because they're less prone to error. All of the monitors are available in the U.K., and many can be purchased in the U.S. A significant negative is that none of the monitors gets much in the way of discussion.
4. Daily Mail (United Kingdom)
Sept. 8, 2009
Under Pressure
by Lucy Elkins
Our AssessmentEight home blood pressure monitors, some of which are available in the U.S., are tested in this report from a U.K. newspaper, the Daily Mail. Each is assessed for accuracy compared to a mercury sphygmomanometer and evaluated for ease of use and features by a high-blood pressure patient and a physician. The A&D Medical LifeSource UA-767 Plus receives the highest rating.
5. Amazon.com
As of May 2011
Health Monitors: Blood Pressure
by Contributors to Amazon.com
Our AssessmentThis Internet retailer lets customers post opinions about products -- including blood pressure monitors -- after the sale. Although the reports lack the precision and depth of professional reviews and medical journal articles, they also lack the latter's detachment and they do a good job of describing minor differences among the many choices on the market. The user feedback here is especially valuable in conjunction with the accuracy reports from the British Hypertension Society and elsewhere.
6. Walmart.com
As of May 2011
Home Medical: Blood Pressure Monitors
by Contributors to Walmart.com
Our AssessmentWalmart.com stocks a variety of low- to mid-priced blood pressure monitors, many of which receive reviews from users. Two models, the ReliOn HEM-741CREL and the Mabis Health Smart 04775001, have particularly large numbers of reviews and high average scores.
7. Walgreens.com
As of May 2011
Blood Pressure Monitors & Accessories
by Contributors to Walgreens.com
Our AssessmentAbout 40 of the 60 or so blood pressure monitors sold at Walgreens.com have at least one owner review, and several models have a dozen or more. The A&D Medical LifeSource UB-521 wrist blood pressure monitor is the most highly rated, receiving an almost perfect average 5-star rating in more than three dozen reviews.
Home Sphygmomanometers: Validation Versus Accuracy
by Tekina Akpolat, et al.
Our AssessmentFive hundred automatic blood pressure monitors are evaluated in this study, which finds that about 72 percent of the units are inaccurate. Devices meeting the British Hypertension Society's standards are found to be much more likely to be accurate.
9. Rodale News
July 6, 2010
Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Monitors Questioned
by Leah Zerbe
Our AssessmentThis article discusses a recent study from The American Journal of Cardiology on the accuracy of home blood pressure monitoring. The study's co-author, Dr. Robert Kloner, offers insightful commentary on his research team's findings.
Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 Automated Blood Pressure Monitors in Elderly Individuals According to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension
by Stefanoa Omboni, et al.
Our AssessmentThis medical journal article tests the accuracy of three Omron blood pressure monitors. Two are designed for home use -- the Omron M5-I (upper arm) and Omron R5-I (wrist) -- while the third is a professional model. The article also highlights the importance of self-monitoring by patients at home.
Can Validated Wrist Devices With Position Sensors Replace Arm Devices for Self-Home Blood Pressure Monitoring? A Randomized Crossover Trial Using Ambulatory Monitoring as Reference
by George S. Stergiou, et al.
Our AssessmentThis study evaluates three blood pressure monitors to determine whether wrist devices with position sensors are effective for self-home monitoring. Using an ambulatory blood pressure device as a control for accurate readings (this type of monitor is worn all day), results reveal the Omron 705-IT arm monitor comes closer to the control than the Omron HEM-637 (R7) wrist device.
The HoMedics BPA-200 and BPA-300 Home Blood Pressure Devices Fail the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol and Cannot Be Recommended for Patient Use
by Clarence E. Grim and Carlene M. Grim
Our AssessmentIn this medical journal abstract, two researchers report on their tests of two blood pressure monitors. The HoMedics BPA-200 and BPA-300 -- both upper-arm monitors -- fail to meet standards set by the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
13. Which? magazine
Oct. 2010
Test Lab: Blood Pressure Kits
by Editors of Which? magazine
Our AssessmentLike ConsumerReports.org and Australia's Choice magazine, the British publication Which? performs independent testing of home blood pressure monitors. Five upper-arm and five wrist units are tested in the most recent roundup. Buying advice and a comparison chart are included. Note that the models featured aren't available in the U.S., so this article is much more useful to U.K. readers.
14. TheHeart.org
May 23, 2008
Home Is Where the Heart Is: Call for Greater Use of Home Blood-Pressure Monitoring
by Michael O'Riordan
Our AssessmentThis article cites the importance of home blood pressure monitoring for patients with hypertension and those at risk for other health problems. A scientific committee representing the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension and the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association cautions patients to use only monitors that have been validated for accuracy and reliability according to standard international testing protocols. The article doesn't recommend specific units but lists features patients should look for in a home blood pressure monitor.
15. Epinions.com
As of May 2011
Blood Pressure Monitors
by Contributors to Epinions.com
Our AssessmentLike Amazon.com, Epinions.com lets consumers write reviews of products they own. While the reviews can be longer and more informative than those at Amazon.com, few blood pressure monitors get much in the way of feedback.

Back to top