
The Nokia 1606 is a very basic clamshell cell phone that offers few features -- no extras like a camera, music player or instant messaging. The most credible review, at PCMag.com, says it's not even very good as a phone -- it has good reception, but voices sound "buzzy, distorted." The Nokia 1606 does offer the advantage of no service commitment for the $80 price tag, and the unusual addition of a flashlight, which you can use even when the phone is turned off. One credible reviewer disses the operating system, based on a brief look at a convention, but a more thorough professional review at PCMag.com says the software "is pretty good."
What the Nokia 1606 does have is a voice recorder -- the phone has 8 MB of onboard memory -- and voice dialer, and a basic WAP web browser. The tiny external display screen is monochrome, and the internal screen measures 1.8 inches and reportedly delivers bright color images. A well-done owner review says that the keys are well-spaced, but that it's a "membrane-type keypad, so not as accurate as possible." (A membrane keyboard means that the keys are not separate, moving parts.) The same owner review says the speaker is loud enough but not of high quality. PCMag.com often tests battery life on cell phones but skips this step on the Nokia 1606. The manufacturer claims 3.5 hours of talk time between charges. PCMag.com reviewer Sascha Segan concludes that if you want a Cricket phone, "I strongly recommend spending the extra $20 for the superior Samsung MyShot R430, which makes clearer calls" (and has a camera).
We found the only thorough professional review at PCMag.com, but even that one is a bit skimpy by the publication's usual standards. But that's as good as it gets in the absence of reviews from usual stalwarts CNET, Consumer Reports, WirelessInfo.com and MobileBurn.com. We also found very few owner reviews, none at Amazon.com at this writing, though the few at PhoneScoop.com and PhoneDog.com are easy to read and helpful.
Our Sources
1. PCMag.com
PCMag.com gives the Nokia 1606 a rating of "fair" -- in practice, that's a pretty low score compared with most cell phones. Reviewer Sascha Segan says the Nokia 1606 delivers poor performance at its primary function, with "distorted" voice quality despite good reception.
Review: Nokia 1606, Sascha Segan, Nov. 24, 2008
We found just one owner review here, but it's very detailed, with multiple pros and cons. The bottom line is that the user says it's worth the $80.
Review: Nokia 1606, Contributors to PhoneScoop.com
3. Phonedog.com
We found just one owner review at this writing, but it offers some good detail and indicates that the Nokia 1606 is good value for the money.
Review: Nokia 1606, Contributors to PhoneDog.com
4. Tech-FAQ.com
Reviews here are little more than assessments of the specifications sheet, with no indication of hands-on evaluations. You could do any of them yourself, but the format does make the information easy to digest.
Review: Nokia 1606, Editors of Tech-FAQ.com
InfoSync usually produces credible, thorough reviews. This is just a blurb written after a quick look, and reviewer Philip Berne isn't impressed with the subpar operating system but does like the Nokia 1606's flashlight.
Review: Nokia 3606 and 1606 bring Nokia back to CDMA, Philip Berne, April 3, 2008
6. PCMag.com
This overview of cheap service providers, including Cricket, has links to full reviews of two Cricket phones, the Motorola VE240 and the Nokia 1606.
Review: Is Cheap Wireless the Recession's Bright Spot?, Sascha Segan, March 12, 2009
|
Sponsored Links are keyword-targeted advertisements provided through the Google AdWords™ program. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by Google. For information about these Google ads, go to adwords.google.com. Google may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your Web browser. Information from this cookie may be used by Google to help provide advertisers with more targeted advertising opportunities. For more information about Google's privacy policy, including how to opt out, go to www.google.com/ads/preferences. By clicking on Sponsored Links you will leave ConsumerSearch.com. The web site you will go to is not endorsed by ConsumerSearch. |