
The Samsung Spex SCH-R210 is a very basic candy-bar cell phone -- no camera, no music player -- with a small 1.5-inch screen and no voice dialing. It does offer the advantage of no contract through either Cricket Wireless or MetroPCS. Owner reviews, while few in number, generally express satisfaction with the Samsung Spex SCH-R210 as long as you don't need bells and whistles. Professional reviewers don't trash the Samsung Spex SCH-R210 but recommend other low-end options -- the Kyocera K312P for MetroPCS and the Motorola VE240 for Cricket users.
CNET tested the Samsung Spex SCH-R210 with MetroPCS service in San Francisco and got "decent" reception, although voices sounded "hollow" and it took "too many" clicks to engage the speakerphone. There's a basic WAP browser, and several owner reviews say it's good "for its type," meaning on par with other cheap cell phones' browsers. But with a tiny screen, you may not want to spend a lot of time surfing the Web. Owner reviews also indicate satisfaction with the "tactile" keys, but CNET reviewer Kent German says you probably won't want to be texting or dialing by feel. CNET did test the battery and got nearly five hours of talk time, more than the manufacturer promises.
We found the only full professional review at CNET, although the Samsung Spex SCH-R210 is evaluated in passing in a review of another cell phone by PCMag.com. Consumer Reports does not cover the Samsung Spex SCH-R210. Owner reviews are in short supply -- none at Amazon.com and CNET and about a half-dozen at PhoneScoop.com.
Our Sources
1. CNET
CNET rates the Samsung Spex SCH-R210 as "good" while using it with the MetroPCS carrier, with "decent" signal reception but "hollow" call quality. It tested the battery and got nearly five hours of talk time on a charge. There are no user reviews at this writing.
Review: Samsung Spex SCH-R210 (MetroPCS), Kent German, June 17, 2008
2. PCMag.com
PCMag.com doesn't review the Samsung Spex SCH-R210. But in a review of another Cricket phone, the Motorola VE240, reviewer Sascha Segan says, "I'd feel safe recommending it over the similar Cricket EZ (which has notorious quality problems) and Samsung Spex."
Review: Motorola VE240 (Cricket, MetroPCS), Sascha Segan, Jan. 8, 2009
Most of the approximately half-dozen owner reviews recommend the Samsung Spex SCH-R210 as long as you don't mind the lack of some features, such as a camera, and several say the web browser is good ("for its type") and that the keys have a "nice, tactile feel."
Review: Samsung Spex R210A, Contributors to PhoneScoop.com
4. YouTube.com
This user review runs nearly six minutes on video and is basically a rundown/demonstration of features, although there is an evaluation score of 8.5 out of 10. He's disappointed the phone doesn't have a camera though, especially for the price. There are a few instances of language by the reviewer that some people might find unacceptable.
Review: Samsung Spex Review, "Lucas X. Anime", June 18, 2008
5. PCMag.com
This report covers inexpensive phone-service providers like Cricket and MetroPCS and links to full reviews of two Cricket phones, the Motorola VE240 and the Nokia 1606.
Review: Is Cheap Wireless the Recession's Bright Spot?, Sascha Segan, Mar. 12, 2009
|
Sponsored Links are keyword-targeted advertisements provided through the Google AdWords™ program. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by Google. For information about these Google ads, go to adwords.google.com. Google may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your Web browser. Information from this cookie may be used by Google to help provide advertisers with more targeted advertising opportunities. For more information about Google's privacy policy, including how to opt out, go to www.google.com/ads/preferences. By clicking on Sponsored Links you will leave ConsumerSearch.com. The web site you will go to is not endorsed by ConsumerSearch. |