
Reviews identify the Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse 5000 as a solid, general-purpose mouse. It is not marketed for gaming, and is topped by other models for that purpose. No reviewer makes a relevant comparison with a Logitech mouse, and that company's mice are rated higher by some of the same sources. The Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse is an older product, and Microsoft has released several higher-end mice over the past year.
HardwareCentral.com and Active Network have good reviews of the Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse 5000. Techtree.com and CNet.com primarily address features and usage. The HardwareCentral.com review favorably compares the 5000 with Microsoft's higher-end Wireless Optical Mouse 6000 (*est. $50).

| Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 5000 - Metallic Black (63A-00001) | |
(138 reviews) |
|
Our Sources
HardwareCentral.com regularly reviews mice and rates them in three unweighted categories to produce an overall score. This review is not up to HardwareCentral's usual standards, and it appears that not much testing is done. The comparison with Microsoft's Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 is brief but revealing, but we can't figure out why the 5000 isn't compared with a Logitech mouse.
Review: Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 5000 Review, Eric Grevstad, July 26, 2006
This review is of Microsoft's Wireless Optical Desktop 5000, which includes the Wireless Optical Mouse 5000. Testing is undocumented and comparisons are generic. However, ratings and subcategory ratings provide a basis for comparison, and lists of pros and cons are also helpful.
Review: Wireless Optical Desktop 5000 Review, Robert Stein
3. Techtree.com
This middling review is not as productive as most on this site and is not written by one of the regular reviewers. Milind Bandekar thinks the Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse 5000 is good, but a poor value (at least at the price it retails for in India, where Techtree.com is based). Comparisons are brief, but reader comments add to the discussion.
Review: Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse 5000 Review, Milind Bandekar, Jan. 16, 2006
4. CNET
This short review makes a single, marginal reference to an alternative product. The product rating doesn't seem to be in line with the review. CNet.com's strength is reviewing lots of mice, but without relevant comparisons, the reviews contribute nothing that isn't better documented in more comprehensive reviews.
Review: Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse 5000 Review, Justin Jaffe, Sept. 16, 2005
Red&BlacknessMods.com is a Swedish computer-hardware review site. The Microsoft Wireless Optical 5000 is the only mouse reviewed on the site, and it is reviewed as part of a desktop set. Although the review is well balanced and helpfully illustrated, the only comparison is a general reference to older Microsoft mice.
Review: Microsoft Wireless Optical 5000 Review, Niko Lupala, Nov. 10, 2005
Computer Mice Runners Up:
3 picks by top review sites.
3 picks by top review sites.
3 picks by top review sites.
3 picks by top review sites.
2 picks including: ForeverGeek.com, DevHardware.com…
2 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Razer Imperator 2012 Gaming Mouse - Battlefield 3 Edition (RZ01-00350300-R3M1)
In Stock.
Average Customer Review: |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Goldtouch Swiftpoint Laptop Wireless Mouse Rechargeable by Ergoguys
In Stock.
Average Customer Review: |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Sponsored Links are keyword-targeted advertisements provided through the Google AdWords™ program. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by Google. For information about these Google ads, go to adwords.google.com. Google may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your Web browser. Information from this cookie may be used by Google to help provide advertisers with more targeted advertising opportunities. For more information about Google's privacy policy, including how to opt out, go to www.google.com/ads/preferences. By clicking on Sponsored Links you will leave ConsumerSearch.com. The web site you will go to is not endorsed by ConsumerSearch. |