
- Attractive retro styling
- Good value
- Potent, fun-to-drive performance V-8
- Five-star crash test ratings
- Well-insulated fabric top
- Lack of refinement
- "Archaic" live-axle rear suspension
- Cramped backseat
- Low fuel economy
Reviewers insist that the Mustang's already-competent handling could be greatly improved if Ford would replace the Mustang's old-tech live-axle rear with an independent suspension. The car's ride gets mixed reviews; some call it appropriate and compliant, while others say it is jiggly and uncontrolled with too much body flex. For 2008, the Ford Mustang gets standard side-impact airbags, and scores an impressive five-star rating in frontal and side-impact crash tests. Reliability, however, is expected to be only average. The Mustang's lack of refinement is also mentioned as a drawback by many reviewers. A larger rear seat and retractable hardtops can be found in front-wheel-drive alternatives like the Chrysler Sebring (*est. $26,600 to $32,715) or the Pontiac G6 (*est. $30,210). A super high-performance Mustang alternative is the Shelby GT500 convertible (*est. $47,155).
Edmunds.com, which puts the Mustang convertible on a list of top recommended convertibles, has a comprehensive review with driving impressions. Car and Driver has an excellent three-car comparison test featuring a 2007 Mustang convertible, which is essentially the same as the current model. Consumer Reports has solid information and a road test review on its subscriber-only site, while Kelley Blue Book features a convertible-specific review. CNet.com reviews a V-6 convertible, paying special attention to the cabin electronics. Automobile.com and TheTruthAboutCars.com each feature a road-test review of convertible models, and Popular Mechanics includes the Mustang on a top-10 list. SaferCar.gov reveals impressive Mustang crash-test results while also has providing details on the Mustang's significant recall record.
The Ford Mustang convertible's retro styling and feel-good ambiance are applauded by many reviewers. Some critics, however, say the Mustang's materials are inferior and note that its interior styling doesn't live up to its eye-catching exterior. The sportier car, they say, is the Mustang GT with a 300-horsepower V-8 engine. Many auto writers strongly recommend the GT over the base 210-horsepower V-6 model because of its better resale value and more satisfying performance. Reviews offer no compliments for the Mustang's mediocre fuel-economy ratings..
Our Sources
1. Edmunds.com
Editors put the Mustang on their list of top convertibles under $35,000 and acknowledge that the Mustang is an American icon. They also, however, mention the Mustang's lack of refinement (which is said to be offset by its low base price). Overall, V-8 models are given preference over the less powerful V-6 cars.
Review: Top Recommended Convertibles, Editors of Edmunds.com
2. Car and DriverDetails/Subscribe
This article compares three "value-priced" 2007 V-6-powered convertibles: the Chrysler Sebring, the Ford Mustang and the Pontiac G6 GT, each of which have few changes for 2008. The Mustang places second to the costlier Pontiac G6 with its folding hardtop. Lauded for its V-6 engine and torque, the Mustang's cramped backseat and "coarseness" are noted as negatives.
Review: 2007 Ford Mustang Review, Patrick Bedard, Aug. 2007
3. ConsumerReports.orgDetails/Subscribe
Editors of Consumer Reports test the Ford Mustang GT coupe and V-6 Mustang convertible. Data on the Mustang's historical reliability compiled from owner surveys is also included.
Review: Ford Mustang Review, Editors of Consumer Reports
Convertibles Runners Up:
7 picks including: Edmunds.com, Environmental Protection Agency…
6 picks including: Car and Driver, Cars.com…
6 picks including: Car and Driver, Cars.com…
5 picks including: Edmunds.com, Environmental Protection Agency…
4 picks including: Cars.com, Edmunds.com…
4 picks including: Car and Driver, InsideLine.com…
3 picks including: Car and Driver, Edmunds.com…
2 picks including: Car and Driver, Edmunds.com…
2 picks including: Cars.com, Environmental Protection Agency…
