2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class

- Good balance of sport and luxury
- Aggressive exterior styling
- Power retractable hardtop
- Optional Airscarf neck-warmer
- Expensive
- Slightly numb steering
- Hasn't been crash tested
- Tall people may feel cramped
- Blind spots bother some testers
Luxury and speed both come standard on the two-seat Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class convertible, and experts say it handles nimbly enough to please most buyers. However, reviews say it can't match the flawless performance of the top-rated Porsche Boxster (*Est. $46,600 to $56,700).
The SLK-Class offers one thing the Boxster doesn't: a retractable hardtop. Experts say that doesn't really matter, as today's power soft tops -- especially the Boxster's excellent one -- are so tight and well insulated they're virtually weatherproof. Buyers still see retractable hardtops as quieter and more burglar-resistant, but reviews warn the SLK-Class's hardtop eats up all but 6.5 cubic feet of the trunk when it's lowered. Some testers say the top creates big blind spots when it's up, but others say they can see fine.
Reviewers say the Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class roadster has a lot in common with its main rival in the luxury two-seat convertible market, the BMW Z4 (*Est. $45,750 to $51,650). Both are fast rear-wheel-drive roadsters, but their slightly softer handling and numb steering feel disappoint critics. Both pack a lot of luxury features under their retractable hardtops. Testers especially like the SLK-Class's optional Airscarf system, which caresses your neck with warm air via ducts in the leather seats' headrests. Reviews say the seats are comfortable, but if you're over 6 feet tall you may feel cramped.
The SLK-Class feels like a "little brother" to the bigger (and vastly more expensive) Mercedes-Benz SL-Class roadster (*Est. $98,500 to $194,700), says Phil Floraday at Automobile Magazine. Mercedes packs bigger engines and its entire catalog of luxury features into the pricey SL-Class and styles both roadsters with an aggressive face that most reviewers like. However, David Yochum of Automobile Magazine says he doesn't see the appeal of the "gigantic Mercedes-Benz logo" embedded in the grille -- although it certainly does attract attention.
The SLK-Class comes in three trim levels. The Mercedes-Benz SLK300 (*Est. $45,950) uses its throaty-sounding, 228-horsepower, 3.0-liter V-6 to perform the zero-to-60 sprint in 6.1 seconds. Enthusiasts take note: the SLK300 is the only trim that offers a manual transmission. Expect 20 mpg in combined driving with the six-speed manual (17 mpg city and 26 mpg highway) or 21 mpg combined with the optional seven-speed automatic with manual shift control (19 mpg city and 26 mpg highway).
The Mercedes-Benz SLK350 (*Est. $50,950) steps up to a 300-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6 with upgraded brakes to match. It shaves half a second off of the SLK300's zero-to-60 time, but gas mileage barely budges with the mandatory automatic transmission (18 mpg city, 26 mpg highway and 21 mpg combined).
The "beastly" engine in the Mercedes-Benz SLK55 AMG (*Est. $65,700) makes it a "world-class performer," Edmunds.com says. The 355-horsepower, 5.4-liter V-8 packs all sorts of muscle, hitting 60 mph in 4.9 seconds. An automatic transmission is the only choice, and fuel economy plunges to 17 mpg combined (14 mpg city and 22 mpg highway).
No government or independent crash tests had been performed on the Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class as of this update. Reliability is about average, both for the SLK-Class and for Mercedes as a whole, according to owner surveys. The SLK-Class convertible carries a four-year, 50,000-mile warranty.
The best review comes from Edmunds.com, which describes all models of the Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class, points out pros and cons and draws some comparisons with competitors. Other sources test only certain trim levels of the SLK-Class, including Automobile Magazine, Car and Driver, Motor Trend and ConsumerGuide.com. The review at ConsumerReports.org focuses on practical matters like safety and reliability more than the others do, but it is based on a 2005 road test. FuelEconomy.gov posts fuel-economy estimates for most cars, including the SLK-Class. J.D. Power and Associates rates the reliability of Mercedes cars in general.
Our Sources
1. Edmunds.com
Edmunds.com commends the SLK for its combination of luxury and performance. The high price and slightly numb steering are noted as drawbacks.
Review: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Review, Editors of Edmunds.com
2. Automobile MagazineDetails/Subscribe
This $65,000 car is fast but not very practical, reviewers here say after testing the high-performance Mercedes-Benz SLK 55 AMG roadster. The retractable hardtop takes up too much trunk space, and it can't keep the cabin quiet. This review also criticizes the car's cramped interior, bumpy ride and "gigantic" Mercedes badge.
Review: Reviews: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK 55 AMG, David Yochum and Phil Floraday, July 25, 2008
3. Car and DriverDetails/Subscribe
The new, more powerful Mercedes-Benz SLK350 is "really not a chick car anymore," reviewer Tony Quiroga concludes in this write-up of the 2009 model. However, the SLK350 convertible comes only with an automatic transmission, and Quiroga says it has lost some of its "spirit and sports-car character."
Review: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK350 -- Quick Take, Tony Quiroga, Dec. 2008
Convertibles Runners Up:
7 picks including: Edmunds.com, Environmental Protection Agency…
6 picks including: Car and Driver, Cars.com…
6 picks including: Car and Driver, Cars.com…
5 picks including: Edmunds.com, Environmental Protection Agency…
4 picks including: Cars.com, Edmunds.com…
4 picks including: Car and Driver, InsideLine.com…
3 picks including: Car and Driver, Edmunds.com…
2 picks including: Car and Driver, Edmunds.com…
2 picks including: Cars.com, Environmental Protection Agency…

