Modern muscle coupe
- Great styling
- Mammoth V-8 punch
- Impressive base V-6 power, fuel economy
- Good traction
- Agile handling
- Intuitive radio/ventilation controls
- Brembo brakes in SS
- Attractive pricing
- Polarizing, claustrophobic interior
- Cheap interior materials
- Poor visibility
- High clutch pedal takeup
- Small trunk, miniscule trunk opening
- Cramped rear seat
- OnStar navigation
In 2006, General Motors sucked all the air out of the room at the Detroit Auto Show when it presented the Camaro Concept, a modern interpretation of the classic Chevrolet pony car that had been put to pasture after the 2002 model year. Soon thereafter, it was announced that a new production Camaro had been greenlit. Anticipation built steadily -- in 2007, the car was one of the stars of the "Transformers" film. General Motors, in an interesting move, dictated that development mules be stripped of the usual camouflage that keeps the bodywork of upcoming cars secret. As a result, spy photos published in magazines and websites further heightened the excitement ahead of the Camaro coupe's official debut. The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro finally arrived in the spring of 2009. According to most auto critics, the wait for the rear-wheel-drive Chevy coupe was worthwhile.
"Graced with massive power, excellent efficiency, unfailing refinement, and show-stopping looks, the Camaro SS nails every essential for its segment," is how Motor Trend's editors summarize the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS (*Est. $30,245 to $33,430) as they award it the win in a three-way muscle coupe comparison. Edmunds.com also picks the Camaro SS over its rivals, the Ford Mustang GT (*Est. $27,210 to $29,160) and Dodge Challenger R/T (*Est. $30,220), writing, "It packs a talented chassis, performance and, yes, attitude at a price within the reach of working-class stiffs." The 6.2-liter V-8 that powers the Camaro SS makes 400 horsepower with the optional six-speed automatic. The engine in the auto-equipped Camaro SS coupe incorporates a fuel-saving cylinder-deactivation feature and is Environmental Protection Agency-rated at 16 mpg city, 25 mpg highway and 19 mpg combined. V-8 Camaro coupes with the standard six-speed manual don't get the cylinder-shutoff feature, but they do get 26 more horsepower. The only fuel-economy penalty for the additional grunt is a highway rating that's one mpg lower than the automatic.
While the fire-breathing Camaro SS garners most of the critical attention, the other half of the story is found in the Camaro V-6 (*Est. $22,245 to $26,580). Sold in LS and LT trim levels, it clearly lacks the all-out brawn of the Camaro SS, but its standard direct-injected 3.6-liter V-6 still produces a stout 304 horsepower. Car and Driver's Michael Austin says, "Though the V-6 Camaro lacks the cojones to run with the biggest boys, it does make a compelling case as a decent sports car."
Of the optional automatic transmission in the V-6, Jalopnik.com's Wes Siler writes, "it's so good that it renders the steering-wheel-mounted shift buttons largely irrelevant." Automobile magazine's Sam Smith is impressed with the Camaro V-6's composure: "On the road, the V-6 Camaro is surprisingly nimble and light on its feet, especially given its rather hefty curb weight." After driving the base-engined Camaro in a comparison against the new Hyundai Genesis coupe, Car and Driver's John Phillips summarizes, "the Camaro V-6, a car so smartly and enjoyably couped up, is a bargain."
The V-6 Camaro with its optional six-speed automatic transmission has an EPA fuel-economy rating of 18 mpg city, 29 mpg highway and 22 mpg combined. Keeping the standard manual gearbox subtracts one mpg each from the city and combined ratings. Visually, the V-6-powered Camaro coupe is nearly identical to the SS, save for some minor styling cues that differentiate the two.
As appealing as the 2010 Chevy Camaro is to many reviewers, critics have no trouble pointing out its shortcomings, either. Jalopnik.com's Siler says that when you climb into the driver's seat, "the first impression is of claustrophobia." BusinessWeek's Thane Peterson rattles off several practical considerations that don't make the grade: "There's no factory-installed navigation system. The storage compartment in the driver's armrest is extremely small. Then there's the trunk, which is shallow and has a small opening, making it impractical for carrying bulky cargo." Motor Trend goes so far as to call that trunk opening "laughable." Back-seat room is also at a premium. "Contortionists should feel right at home," snarks Cars.com in reference to the cramped rear quarters.
Inside Line's Jason Kavanagh minces no words about the view outward: "If the (Dodge) Challenger is a tank, the Camaro is a bunker. Visibility stinks." Inside Line also summarizes the interior design, writing, "A blend of retro and contemporary cues, the Camaro's interior is ultimately something of a mixed bag." Edmunds.com says "the steering wheel is overstyled and doesn't fit human hands the way it should," and also dings the Camaro for lackluster materials inside. The Camaro's substantial weight is mentioned in several reviews.
All 2010 Chevy Camaro coupe models feature standard driver and passenger airbags, standard antilock brakes and standard electronic stability control. In National Highway Traffic Safety Administration testing the 2010 Camaro coupe earns a five-star rating for driver safety in a side-impact crash, but tests for frontal, rear passenger and rollover safety have not been conducted as of this writing. Likewise, the independent Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has not crash-tested the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro coupe.
Because the 2010 Camaro is brand new and so highly anticipated, reviews are abundant. Comparison tests against key segment rivals are conducted by Edmunds Inside Line, Cars.com, Car and Driver, Popular Mechanics and Motor Trend. Single-car reviews are also available at most of the same outlets, as well as ConsumerGuide.com, BusinessWeek, Road & Track, Automobile magazine, Jalopnik.com, and Autoblog.com. Kelley Blue Book puts together a good video review.
Our Sources
Edmunds Inside Line assembles the Chevy Camaro SS, Ford Mustang GT and Dodge Challenger R/T for a comparison. Overall, the Camaro is the easy winner here, offering up levels of performance that the Mustang and Challenger can't match, combined with distinct attitude and curb appeal.
Review: 2010 Chevy Camaro SS vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger R/T vs. 2010 Ford Mustang GT, Jason Kavanagh, March 22, 2009
2. Motor TrendDetails/Subscribe
The editors of Motor Trend also compare the latest Detroit muscle machines. The 2010 Chevy Camaro SS takes the win for its combination of fantastic style, immense power, great handling, surprising efficiency and overall value. This article also includes an informative video on the results page.
Review: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger R/T vs. 2010 Ford Mustang GT, Arthur St. Antoine, March 21, 2009
3. Motor TrendDetails/Subscribe
While there's much excitement surrounding the V-8-powered 2010 Chevy Camaro SS, Motor Trend compares the base V-6 Camaro against the V-6 version of the equally new 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8. Todd Lassa enjoys the Camaro but he says the Hyundai Genesis coupe outperforms it and represents the future of the rear-drive sport-coupe category. As has become common practice at Motor Trend, a video is included with the article.
Review: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro V-6 vs. 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track, Todd Lassa, July 1, 2009
Coupes Runners Up:
5 picks by top review sites.
4 picks by top review sites.
3 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
1 pick by top review sites.
1 pick by top review sites.
1 pick by top review sites.
1 pick by top review sites.
1 pick by top review sites.
1 pick by top review sites.


