Get info about new reports and updates
- Incredibly easy to use
- Pocket-sized
- Direct upload to YouTube or AOL
- Mediocre video
- Almost zero features
The Pure Digital Flip Ultra is slightly less expensive than its cousin, the well-regarded Pure Digital Flip Mino (Discontinued), and some users actually find it more convenient because of one major difference: The Ultra runs on AA batteries, unlike the rechargeable Mino. Users say the AA batteries are especially convenient if you're not near an outlet, or if you don't want to wait for the camcorder to charge. However, to house those chunky batteries, the Ultra is 40 percent bigger than the Mino. Experts say the Ultra's video is mediocre compared with full-size camcorders, and not quite as good as the Mino. Users say the Ultra is ideal for shooting quick, YouTube-type videos. The Pure Digital Flip Ultra includes software that uploads directly to YouTube or AOL, although not MySpace (available on the Mino).
Trusted Reviews, a British site, has the most comprehensive review of the Pure Digital Flip Ultra, covering every aspect of the camcorder and comparing it with the Creative Vado. The reviews at Laptop magazine, The New York Times and CNet are briefer, but they are thorough and based on testing. We found a comprehensive video review at YouTube, and some user reviews at Amazon.com also include videos shot with the Flip Ultra.
Flip Mino Video Camera - Black, 2 GB,1 Hour (1st Generation) OLD MODEL
Average Customer Review: |
||
|
|
| Flip Ultra Series Camcorder, 60-Minutes (Black) OLD MODEL | |
(1,592 reviews) In Stock. Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping |
|
Our Sources
Britain's Trusted Reviews tests all aspects of the Flip Ultra, comparing it with the Creative Vado and briefly referring to the Flip Mino. Objective scores are given for features, image quality and value, as well as an overall score. This review also includes photos of the Ultra from every angle.
Review: Flip Video Ultra review, James Morris, June 21, 2008
This review of the Flip Ultra isn't very long, but it is based on testing and covers all of the major considerations. Reviewer Michael Patrick Brady compares the Ultra with the Creative Vado in terms of video quality.
Review: Pure Digital Flip Video Ultra review, Michael Patrick Brady, June 9, 2008
According to New York Times technology columnist David Pogue, the inexpensive and feature-poor Flip Ultra is a "blast'" to film with. Pogue's testing finds plenty of warts, but also lots of things to be pleased about.
Review: Camcorder Brings Zen to the Shoot, David Pogue, March 20, 2008
4. CNET
This one-page review covers the pros and cons of the Flip Ultra, based on testing. Reviewer David Carnoy draws brief comparisons between the Ultra and the RCA Small Wonder EZ201. The camcorder is rated by Carnoy, and also receives a rating from users, who post brief reviews of there own as well.
Review: Flip Video Ultra Review, David Carnoy, Oct. 2, 2007
5. YouTube.com
Reviewer Matt provides a comprehensive video review of the Pure Digital Flip Ultra, comparing it with the original (now discontinued) Flip Video. The nearly 10-minute review includes clips shot with each camcorder, so the viewer can experience the differences between video and audio on the two models.
Review: Full Flip Ultra Review, "Matt", Dec. 12, 2007
6. Amazon.com
With almost 1,000 reviews by users, the Pure Digital Flip Ultra maintains a 4-of-5-stars rating on Amazon.com. Critical reviews are included, along with video reviews that show how the camera performs.
Review: Flip Video Ultra Reviews, Contributors to Amazon.com
