Sponsored Links

Kodak EasyShare W820

*Est. $130

Reviewed October 2009
Kodak EasyShare W820

Budget wireless digital photo frame

pros
  • 512 MB memory
  • Wi-Fi
  • Extensive memory card and file format support
  • Web-enabled features
cons
  • Complicated Wi-Fi setup
  • Counter-intuitive touch-screen navigation
  • Overly complex menu system
  • Bland design and build quality
 
 
Where to Buy
 
 
 
5 star:
(4)
4 star:
(4)
3 star:
(0)
2 star:
(5)
1 star:
(2)

Average Customer Review

(15 customer reviews)

Search Reviews

Page 123
newest | oldest | popular | helpful
Kodak Wireless Frame - Great Product, October 11, 2009

I purchased the frame as a birthday present for my wife who was complaining about never seeing all the photos of the grandkids taken over the years. Since I had a wireless router installed, I only looked at frames that had that capability. At the time ( July 2009 ) there were not that many competitors to look at. Kodak had the most installed, and also the most feedbacks on Amazon, and other sites. I was surprised that it only had a 3 star rating overall, but had the biggest customer base. Most of the negative comments were on installation, support and documentation problems. Digging into the complaints they seemed mostly centered on installation and networking issues. Prior to ordering, I happened across a You Tube video that showed the entire process from opening the box to installing the software, connecting to the network, loading the photos, and running the frame. It appearded straight forward, and in some cases intuative or obvious. When I got the unit, I proceeded to follow the brief and somewhat sketchy installing steps. The network steps were straight-forward if you have previously added wireless devices to your network. if not, the terminology could be daunting and worst case confusing. The frame found my network, logged on and appeared just like every other device I have networked. At that point I was ready to load the frame. Although I loaded Kodak software to control and operate the frame, I decided to use Windows Explorer to copy the photos onto the frame. It worked, but when I tried to manipulate the photos, the frame did not respond. I then switched to the Kodak software and everything worked fine. I really have no major issues with this product. I have not tried using the photos stored on the Kodak site, or other on-line photo sites. I have no reason to believe that they would not work as advertised. My only minor complaint is the touch commands on the frame. I have the urge to actually touch the screen ( as opposed to the border icons) to enter commands. I would have liked a touch screen, but the icons work fine. Even my wife finds operating the frame easy and straight forward. I can highly recommend the product as it does exactly what it is designed to do.

expand

collapse

Great Idea, Horrible Implementation, September 19, 2009

Just like almost everyone who bought this frame, I wanted it to stream from my Flickr account into my parents home. The usability of this frame is terrible. It drops wireless connection all the time, it freezes, and the UI is awful. The Kodak software you have to use to manage the frame is also terrible. Nothing is user friendly, nothing is intuitive. Even with the latest firmware and software updates. The slide UI is ridiculous and seldom works as expected. The lack of control over what streams from your Flickr account is also non-existent. I doubt my parents want to see all my contacts photos too. I realized after spending two frustrating days with this frame, that handing it over to my parents would be down right evil. If I was frustrated beyond belief with it, they would be completely lost. Run away from this frame if you are buying it for its wireless capabilities, you will lose many frustrating hours of your life to it, that you can never get back. Seriously, I had high hopes for this frame, and did my best to not let it beat me. I am now returning TWO of them. Why are you still reading? You should be running.

expand

collapse

I like it but it has its issues, September 10, 2009

It's very nice looking and does the trick. I've set it up to get pictures from Kodak Galery. Unfortunately sometimes the picture gets stuck and stops moving and only restart helps. also, if you add more pictures, they do not automaticall refres, you have to restart. and it could be nice if you could have more sources for pictures. for example, Shutterfly is not supported, and you cannot mix sources (kodak galery, facebook and internal memory). also, pictures are sometimes cut and not fit the screen good. I hope they will release a firmware upgrade soon with some fixes.

expand

collapse

WiFi Frame, August 20, 2009

We have a new baby and we bought a frame for each set of grandparents for christmas and one for ourselves. I can download pics onto my computer with my camera and upload easily to Kodak's site, then the picture automatically (after you set up an account etc..) update on the grandparent's frame - it's awesome! They love getting new pictures of the baby all the time. This is a fantastic gift! The frame was easy for us to use although with the initial setup we needed to help out the grandparents who aren't very technically inclined. But once it's done it's great!

expand

collapse

It Works, August 7, 2009
It works.

Just need to upgrade to the latest firmware
(Mine is using oct 2008). I am able to connect using my G router (WPA2 Personal - AES). So for those that claim it does not work, well it works for me.

I am using it to stream the google picasa and facebook to my living room. Works pretty well.
Where To Buy
 
 

Kodak EasyShare W820 8-Inch Wireless Digital Frame

 (15 customer reviews)
Buy new: $199.00 Too low to display   61 Used from $68.95

In Stock. Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping

 
 
 

Our Sources

1. DigitalPictureFrameReview.com

This outstanding review provides an exhaustively complete analysis of every aspect of the Kodak EasyShare W820, from aesthetics to ease of use to display quality. Photographs detail all angles and uses of the frame, and there is some comparison to Samsung frames that the site recently reviewed.

Review: Review: Kodak EasyShare W820 Digital Picture Frame, "MKowalski", Nov. 24, 2008

2. PCMag.com

PCMag.com's Zach Honig is not impressed by the Kodak W820, and he offers a great deal of commentary on alternative options from manufacturers such as Pandigital, Sony and eStarling. In spite of his obvious skepticism of the W820, Honig delivers a balanced and fair assessment of the frame.

Review: Kodak EasyShare W820 Wireless Digital Frame, Zach Honig, Dec. 8, 2008

3. CNET

CNET's large database of digital frame reviews and standard ratings system help lend its assessment of the Kodak W1020 greater comparative value than is embedded in the article -- which is to say that the review contains little comparison. And while CNET's evaluation doesn't touch on incidentals such as the wireless setup process, it does provide a good description of display quality and performance glitches.

Review: Kodak EasyShare W1020 Wireless Digital Frame, David Carnoy, Dec. 15, 2008

4. TrustedReviews.com

Supplemented with photographs and a three-minute video overview, TrustedReviews.com's write-up touches on build quality, display specifications, features and display quality. More descriptive than evaluative, this coverage of the W1020 is a good place to learn what the frame's technology is capable of, but look elsewhere to find how it actually performs.

Review: Kodak EasyShare W1020 Digital Picture Frame Review, Edward Chester, Feb. 14, 2009

5. Computer Shopper

Matt Safford's concise review provides a quick description of what Kodak says its EasyShare W1020 frame can do and then delves into where it falls short. Safford writes from the position that a digital frame should be a "set it and forget it" device, and his conclusion is communicated clearly.

Review: Kodak EasyShare W1020 Digital Picture Frame, Matt Safford, Feb. 2009

6. PC World

This PC World analysis of the EasyShare W1020 is in keeping with Kathleen Cullen's signature brevity, but unlike her other reviews, it is also lacking in detail and reads more like an evaluation of manufacturer specifications than findings resulting from hands-on use.

Review: Kodak EasyShare W1020, Kathleen Cullen, June 4, 2009

Digital Picture Frames Runners Up:

Sony DPF-D70 *Est. $100

3 picks by top review sites.

Sony DPF-V900 *Est. $175

3 picks by top review sites.

Samsung SPF-105P *Est. $100

2 picks by top review sites.

CEIVAshare Digital Photo Frame *Est. $130 plus subscription

1 pick including: Amazon.com, Laptop Magazine…

     
 
image
Sony DPF-D70 7-inch Digital Photo Frame
Buy from Amazon.com
from Amazon.com
New: Too low to display   
In Stock.
Average Customer Review:  
 
 
 
 
     
 
image
Sony DPF-V900 9-Inch Digital Photo Frame
Buy from Amazon.com
from Amazon.com
New: $169.99   
In Stock.
Average Customer Review:  
 
 
 
 
     
   
 
 
 
     
 
image
CEIVAshare 8-Inch Digital Photo Frame (Black)
Buy from Amazon.com
from Amazon.com
New: $129.99   
In Stock.
Average Customer Review:  
 
 
 
 
Sponsored Links

Back to top