Page: 5 of 5
Digital Picture Frames: Ratings of Sources
Total of 17 Sources
1. ConsumerReports.org
May 2009
Digital Picture Frames
by Editors of ConsumerReports.org
Our Assessment ConsumerReports.org examines 24 7- and 8-inch digital photo frames in prices ranging from $60 to $300. Four frames are chosen as recommendations. The article also outlines buying advice.
2. CNET
As of Oct. 2009
Digital Photo Frames
by Editors of CNET
Our Assessment

CNET updated its digital photo frames database in May 2009 with a flurry of reviews covering eight new frames. Most of the newly evaluated models earn middling ratings and no frames earn the site's top rating of five stars, nor are any granted an Editor's Choice designation. Kodak frames dominate the top tier of scores on the site. Only a few reviews are directly comparative, but a product grid allows for easy comparison of ratings. CNET offers the largest and most diverse array of digital photo frame reviews.

expand

collapse

3. PCMag.com
As of Oct. 2009
Digital Photo Frames Reviews
by Editors of PCMag.com
Our Assessment

Similar to CNET, PCMag.com offers a searchable collection of reviews that can be sorted by rating and the ultimate stamp of approval, Editors' Choice. The Sony Vaio and Pandigital DPF80-2 are the only digital frames with near-perfect scores of 4.5, plus the Editors' Choice stamp. The Sony DPF-V900 gets four stars. An accompanying article, "How to Buy a Digital Photo Frame," collects 12 older reviews and offers buying advice and recommendations.

expand

collapse

4. DigitalPictureFrameReview.com
As of Oct. 2009
Reviews
by Editors of DigitalPictureFrameReview.com
Our Assessment

This blog-style website is an excellent resource for recent and thorough reviews of new digital frames. Frames are evaluated with a step-by-step assessment from the box to setup to final display, and are meticulously chronicled by photographs and text. Reviewers offer pros, cons and a bottom line with a one-to-five-star rating and Editor's Choice awards. Unlike CNET and PCMag.com, DigitalPictureFrameReview.com offers no comparison chart or easy way to sort and compare ratings. While reviews are very good overall, there is some inconsistency in the ratings. For example, Sony's DPF-D80 earns an Editor's Choice nod with four out of five stars, while the identically-rated GiiNii Slope fails to win the designation.

expand

collapse

5. Pocket-lint.com
As of Oct. 2009
Digital Photo Frames
by Editors of Pocket-lint.com
Our Assessment

U.K.-based Pocket-lint.com has a total of 16 digital photo frame reviews, 12 of which date within the last 18 months. Not all of the reviewed frames are available in the U.S., but the site includes many of the most prominent international brands, such as Kodak and Sony. Reviews encompass the basics of operation and image quality, and include excellent photo galleries that show various aspects of each frame. A 10-point rating system is the only real form of comparison on the site, and review detail and quality varies somewhat. In general (perhaps reflecting the development of the digital photo frame market), more recent reviews are superior in detail to earlier ones.

expand

collapse

6. Xtremecomputing.co.uk
Aug. 2008
Digital Photo Frame Round Up
by "Archer"
Our Assessment

In an extensive and exceptionally thorough head-to-head, "Archer" compares six digital photo frames based on specifications, ease of use and display quality. The older article is illustrated with photos of each frame, as well as comparative shots of the frames together. Pros and cons are identified for each and a best frame -- the AG Neovo -- is named (although the reviewer maintains that the Ceiva frame would be the best if not for the required subscription service). One downfall of this roundup is the confusing awards, which include Platinum, Recommended, Gold and Silver, with no easy manner of differentiation.

expand

collapse

7. DigitalTrends.com
Not Dated
10 Best Digital Photo Frames Reviewed
by Krissy Rushing
Our Assessment This roundup review of 10 digital frames offers no formal rating or ranking system and is not directly comparative. However, vague comparisons (i.e., "you'll be better off with one of the other frames") and an Editor's Pick designation (awarded to three models) help to clarify which frames fare the best. Each frame is evaluated based on aesthetics, ease of setup and use, and display quality.
8. WebUser
As of Oct. 2009
Digital Photo Frame Reviews
by Editors of Web User
Our Assessment

Web User has reviewed eight frames in the past year. Not all frames covered by this U.K.-based site are available in the U.S. Each frame is rated on a five-point scale for features, performance, ease of use and value, and then given an overall rating. Reviews are perfunctory, addressing specifications and summing up quality with subjective descriptions such as "very good." Ease of use is not addressed at all outside of the ratings. Gold, Silver and Bronze awards are granted to top performers. The Samsung SPF-105P earns the site's 2008 Gold Award.

expand

collapse

9. MacLife.com
As of Oct. 2009
Digital Camera Reviews
by Editors of MacLife.com
Our Assessment

MacLife.com reviews a few digital frames each year and includes them in the same category as their digital camera reviews. Reviews are very brief and touch on the highs and lows of each product, with little description of specifications or general features. Comparisons to other models are infrequent, and there's no rating or ranking system in place. No clear best-performing frame emerges from these evaluations.

expand

collapse

10. ConsumerGuide.com
As of Oct. 2009
Digital Picture Frames
by Editors of ConsumerGuide.com
Our Assessment ConsumerGuide.com reviews eight digital photo frames, giving three Best Buy designations, including the now-discontinued Kodak EasyShare EX811. Editors also point out products that should be avoided such as the Digital Spectrum MemoryFrame MF-575 and Smartparts SPDPF70E, each of which receives a two-star rating. Unfortunately, there have been no new reviews in this category since October 2007.
11. TrustedReviews.com
As of Oct. 2009
Digital Photo Frames
by Editors of TrustedReviews.com
Our Assessment This British website performs individual product reviews, but it doesn't do direct comparisons. The digital frames are rated on a scale of one to 10 for features, usability and value, and given an overall rating. However, the reviews are tricky to find within the site as digital photo frames don't have their own category page. Not all models are available in the U.S.
12. CrunchGear.com
As of Aug. 2009
Digital Picture Frames
by Editors of CrunchGear.com
Our Assessment

CrunchGear.com infrequently offers commentary on digital photo frames in a blog-like format, authored by a stable of tech enthusiasts of varying quality as reviewers. The best reviews on this site are succinct but still address build quality, usability, features and specifications and offer well-supported conclusions. There is no rating or ranking system, and no easy way to compare frames. The Ipevo Kaleido R7 emerges as the frame with the most favorable conclusion.

expand

collapse

13. Computer Active
As of Oct. 2009
Hardware: Gadgets
by Editors of Computer Active
Our Assessment

Computer Active is a U.K.-based technology magazine that periodically covers digital frames under the gadgets category. Reviews are succinct, touching only on the most notable highs and lows of each model. Specifications are not listed and usability and display quality are described subjectively with very little explanation for the findings. Products are rated, although there's no easy way to compare ratings, and favored frames are noted with a "Buy It!" icon. Reviews do little to explain what sets these top performers apart from the rest, however.

expand

collapse

14. I4U.com
As of Oct. 2009
Miscellaneous Reviews
by Shane McGlaun
Our Assessment

Buried deep in the miscellaneous subsection of I4U.com's reviews pages, alongside write-ups of sunglasses and wall art, are the four digital photo frame reviews that Shane McGlaun has penned in the last two years. Reviews are succinct and address the basics of screen specifications, display quality and setup. Products are rated on a 10-point scale and top performers are awarded Editor's Choice status. The site's ratings methods are of dubious comparative value given that all frames rate a roughly equal 8.5 or nine, but McGlaun distinguishes himself by covering frames not always seen on other review sites.

expand

collapse

15. Amazon.com
As of Oct. 2009
Digital Frames
by Contributors to Amazon.com
Our Assessment

Reviews for digital photo frames at Amazon.com shed some light on usability. Owners have a hard time getting digital frames to work, and they often don't perform as well as expected. Submitted ratings and reviews vary from thorough to paltry, and Amazon's rating system doesn't account for the number of reviews. As a result, there's a number of frames with perfect scores, but the score is based on just a single reviewer, while other frames with hundreds of reviews come in with slightly lower ratings. Kodak stands out as having the best-rated digital frames (with consistent scores of 4.5 out of five) with more than two reviews.

expand

collapse

16. TigerDirect.com
As of Oct. 2009
Digital Picture Frames
by Contributors to TigerDirect.com
Our Assessment

Technology retailer TigerDirect.com allows customers to submit reviews of products. As with all user-review sites, the quality of customer feedback varies wildly. Each contributor is required to submit an overall rating for their product, along with ratings for value, performance, quality and features, as well as a narrative explaining their experience. Many digital photo frames have very high ratings, but the GiiNii GN-811DS stands out as a highly rated product that has also been reviewed by many (approximately three dozen) contributors. Most praise the frame's affordability and display quality. A few complain that the navigation menus can be difficult to use.

expand

collapse

17. Digital-PhotoFrames.org
As of Oct. 2009
Digital Photo/Picture Frame Reviews
by Editors of Digital-PhotoFrames.org
Our Assessment

This quirky site's value is primarily in its category organization, which allows users to sort reviewed frames based on screen size or brand name. Should the site grow and continue adding frames to its database, the screen-size categories will be especially useful. Unfortunately, the rest of the site is pretty lackluster. Reviews consist of descriptions that seem to be based solely on manufacturer specifications with no indication that the editors have actually touched, much less tested, each model. There is no rating or ranking system, and no comparisons are made between frames.

expand

collapse

Back to top