See Also
For an explanation of how we rank reviews, see our ratings criteria page.
by Editors of ConsumerReports.org
by Editors of CNET
CNET updated its digital photo frames database in May 2009 with a flurry of reviews covering eight new frames. Most of the newly evaluated models earn middling ratings and no frames earn the site's top… rating of five stars, nor are any granted an Editor's Choice designation. Kodak frames dominate the top tier of scores on the site. Only a few reviews are directly comparative, but a product grid allows for easy comparison of ratings. CNET offers the largest and most diverse array of digital photo frame reviews.
by Editors of PCMag.com
Similar to CNET, PCMag.com offers a searchable collection of reviews that can be sorted by rating and the ultimate stamp of approval, Editors' Choice. The Sony Vaio and Pandigital DPF80-2 are the only… digital frames with near-perfect scores of 4.5, plus the Editors' Choice stamp. The Sony DPF-V900 gets four stars. An accompanying article, "How to Buy a Digital Photo Frame," collects 12 older reviews and offers buying advice and recommendations.
by Editors of DigitalPictureFrameReview.com
This blog-style website is an excellent resource for recent and thorough reviews of new digital frames. Frames are evaluated with a step-by-step assessment from the box to setup to final display, and are… meticulously chronicled by photographs and text. Reviewers offer pros, cons and a bottom line with a one-to-five-star rating and Editor's Choice awards. Unlike CNET and PCMag.com, DigitalPictureFrameReview.com offers no comparison chart or easy way to sort and compare ratings. While reviews are very good overall, there is some inconsistency in the ratings. For example, Sony's DPF-D80 earns an Editor's Choice nod with four out of five stars, while the identically-rated GiiNii Slope fails to win the designation.
by Editors of Pocket-lint.com
U.K.-based Pocket-lint.com has a total of 16 digital photo frame reviews, 12 of which date within the last 18 months. Not all of the reviewed frames are available in the U.S., but the site includes many of… the most prominent international brands, such as Kodak and Sony. Reviews encompass the basics of operation and image quality, and include excellent photo galleries that show various aspects of each frame. A 10-point rating system is the only real form of comparison on the site, and review detail and quality varies somewhat. In general (perhaps reflecting the development of the digital photo frame market), more recent reviews are superior in detail to earlier ones.
by "Archer"
In an extensive and exceptionally thorough head-to-head, "Archer" compares six digital photo frames based on specifications, ease of use and display quality. The older article is illustrated with photos of… each frame, as well as comparative shots of the frames together. Pros and cons are identified for each and a best frame -- the AG Neovo -- is named (although the reviewer maintains that the Ceiva frame would be the best if not for the required subscription service). One downfall of this roundup is the confusing awards, which include Platinum, Recommended, Gold and Silver, with no easy manner of differentiation.
by Krissy Rushing
by Editors of Web User
Web User has reviewed eight frames in the past year. Not all frames covered by this U.K.-based site are available in the U.S. Each frame is rated on a five-point scale for features, performance, ease of use… and value, and then given an overall rating. Reviews are perfunctory, addressing specifications and summing up quality with subjective descriptions such as "very good." Ease of use is not addressed at all outside of the ratings. Gold, Silver and Bronze awards are granted to top performers. The Samsung SPF-105P earns the site's 2008 Gold Award.
by Editors of MacLife.com
MacLife.com reviews a few digital frames each year and includes them in the same category as their digital camera reviews. Reviews are very brief and touch on the highs and lows of each product, with little… description of specifications or general features. Comparisons to other models are infrequent, and there's no rating or ranking system in place. No clear best-performing frame emerges from these evaluations.
by Editors of ConsumerGuide.com
by Editors of TrustedReviews.com
by Editors of CrunchGear.com
CrunchGear.com infrequently offers commentary on digital photo frames in a blog-like format, authored by a stable of tech enthusiasts of varying quality as reviewers. The best reviews on this site are… succinct but still address build quality, usability, features and specifications and offer well-supported conclusions. There is no rating or ranking system, and no easy way to compare frames. The Ipevo Kaleido R7 emerges as the frame with the most favorable conclusion.
by Editors of Computer Active
Computer Active is a U.K.-based technology magazine that periodically covers digital frames under the gadgets category. Reviews are succinct, touching only on the most notable highs and lows of each model.… Specifications are not listed and usability and display quality are described subjectively with very little explanation for the findings. Products are rated, although there's no easy way to compare ratings, and favored frames are noted with a "Buy It!" icon. Reviews do little to explain what sets these top performers apart from the rest, however.
by Shane McGlaun
Buried deep in the miscellaneous subsection of I4U.com's reviews pages, alongside write-ups of sunglasses and wall art, are the four digital photo frame reviews that Shane McGlaun has penned in the last two… years. Reviews are succinct and address the basics of screen specifications, display quality and setup. Products are rated on a 10-point scale and top performers are awarded Editor's Choice status. The site's ratings methods are of dubious comparative value given that all frames rate a roughly equal 8.5 or nine, but McGlaun distinguishes himself by covering frames not always seen on other review sites.
by Contributors to Amazon.com
Reviews for digital photo frames at Amazon.com shed some light on usability. Owners have a hard time getting digital frames to work, and they often don't perform as well as expected. Submitted ratings and… reviews vary from thorough to paltry, and Amazon's rating system doesn't account for the number of reviews. As a result, there's a number of frames with perfect scores, but the score is based on just a single reviewer, while other frames with hundreds of reviews come in with slightly lower ratings. Kodak stands out as having the best-rated digital frames (with consistent scores of 4.5 out of five) with more than two reviews.
by Contributors to TigerDirect.com
Technology retailer TigerDirect.com allows customers to submit reviews of products. As with all user-review sites, the quality of customer feedback varies wildly. Each contributor is required to submit an… overall rating for their product, along with ratings for value, performance, quality and features, as well as a narrative explaining their experience. Many digital photo frames have very high ratings, but the GiiNii GN-811DS stands out as a highly rated product that has also been reviewed by many (approximately three dozen) contributors. Most praise the frame's affordability and display quality. A few complain that the navigation menus can be difficult to use.
by Editors of Digital-PhotoFrames.org
This quirky site's value is primarily in its category organization, which allows users to sort reviewed frames based on screen size or brand name. Should the site grow and continue adding frames to its… database, the screen-size categories will be especially useful. Unfortunately, the rest of the site is pretty lackluster. Reviews consist of descriptions that seem to be based solely on manufacturer specifications with no indication that the editors have actually touched, much less tested, each model. There is no rating or ranking system, and no comparisons are made between frames.
|
This is our assessment of the review’s relevance, clarity of testing and thoroughness.
Read more about our Ratings Criteria by clicking the link at the top of the page.
|
||




