Sponsored Links

2009 Chrysler 300

*Est. $26,665 to $44,160

Reviewed April 2009
2009 Chrysler 300

pros
  • Roomy
  • Optional V-8 provides great acceleration
  • All-wheel drive is available
  • Bold styling
cons
  • Higher trim levels are expensive
  • Mixed crash-test results
  • Unimpressive fuel economy
  • Reliability is average or below
  • Mixed reviews for ride and handling
  • Underpowered base engine
  • Poor interior quality doesn't match price
  • Poor outward visibility

Critics find a few things to like about the flamboyant Chrysler 300, with its aggressive optional V-8 engine, boxy styling and luxury image (a mini-stretch version offers fold-up footrests and a table in the back seat). But overall, they say the more practical versions of the 300 lack power, and the more powerful versions lack practicality.

"There are certainly other full-size sedans to consider," say Edmunds.com editors after testing the Chrysler 300. "The Ford Taurus [*est. $25,170 to $37,170] offers more maximum passenger and cargo space, while the Toyota Avalon [*est. $27,845 to $35,185] offers more luxury and refinement." And if you really want a family sedan that's exhilarating to drive, "no 300 can quite match the thrilling yet refined Pontiac G8 GT [*est. $31,755]."

Reviews say the Chrysler 300 does have its good points, such as available all-wheel drive (although we found no reviews that test the 300 off-road or in snow). It's built on the same rear-drive platform as the very similar Dodge Charger (*est. $24,835 to $38,970). Both are backed by Chrysler's three-year/36,000-mile basic warranty and lifetime powertrain warranty, but experts say the Chrysler 300 is the more reliable car.

The Chrysler 300 shares some of the Dodge Charger's problems, including poor side crash scores in tests at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.  When IIHS testers simulated a pickup or SUV hitting the Charger/300 in the side at 31 mph, they found that the driver would likely suffer serious harm. "Rib fractures and/or internal organ injuries would be likely in a crash of this severity. A fracture of the pelvis would also be likely," IIHS says. Also, the simulated pickup plunged inside the Charger/300 and hit the crash dummy's head. IIHS notes that rear crash protection in the Charger/300 is "marginal," and electronic stability control doesn't come standard on the base trim.

Like the Dodge Charger, the Chrysler 300 also loses points in reviews for its cave-like cabin, poor visibility and disappointing interior for the price. "Note that 300 prices climb quickly with options, and what passes for acceptable at $30,000 seems inappropriately cheap on cars loaded to $45,000," say editors at ConsumerGuide.com. "One test 300 suffered from misaligned body panels and improperly assembled interior trim pieces." As for handling, experts say you'll never mistake even a top-level Chrysler 300 for a European sports sedan -- or a Pontiac G8. Lower-level Chrysler 300 trims are tuned more for comfort, reviews say.

The base Chrysler 300 LX (*est. $26,665) has been discontinued; although a limited number were still available when we checked, experts advise passing on this underpowered trim level. The Chrysler 300 Touring (*est. $26,915) has replaced the LX as the base model, but it still runs on the same 178-horsepower, 2.7-liter V-6 that critics disliked on the 300 LX. With a four-speed automatic transmission, the Chrysler 300 Touring delivers 21 mpg in mixed driving (18 city/26 highway).

The Chrysler 300 Limited (*est. $34,720) includes more standard features (such as heated leather seats and an improved stereo) and important items (such as electronic stability control). It also upgrades to a 250-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6 engine that the Environmental Protection Agency predicts will get 20 mpg in mixed driving (17 city/25 highway). Reviewers say this engine is adequately powerful, although it delivers only 19 mpg in two real-world expert driving tests.

You get a Hemi V-8 in the Chrysler 300C (*est. $37,135). The 360-horsepower, 5.7-liter engine is paired with a five-speed automatic. This engine discreetly shuts down four cylinders whenever they aren't needed, but the EPA estimates it will still deliver only 19 mpg in mixed driving (16 city/25 highway) -- and in real-world tests, it gets only 16 or 17 mpg.

Not surprisingly, testers say the performance-tuned Chrysler 300 STR8 (*est. $44,160) offers immense power. Its 425-horsepower, 6.1-liter V-8 Hemi also drinks immense amounts of gas (13 mpg city/19 highway/15 combined), and doesn't utilize the cylinder-deactivation feature that's standard on the 300C's 5.7-liter engine. You'll pay a $1,700 gas-guzzler tax on the Chrysler 300 SRT8, which uses a five-speed automatic transmission.

Consumer Reports judges the Chrysler 300 from a consumer's point of view, giving weight to factors like reliability, fuel economy and value. Testers at Edmunds.com, ConsumerGuide.com, Car and Driver and Kelley Blue Book consider those issues to some extent, but they pay more attention to whether the Chrysler 300 delivers sheer driving pleasure. Government and nonprofit websites are good for objective data about safety and fuel economy, and J.D. Power and Associates is a good source for reliability information.

expand

collapse

Where To Buy

Our Sources

1. ConsumerReports.org

Consumer Reports tests just about every family sedan, including the Chrysler 300. Experts provide helpful reliability predictions based on reader surveys about past model years. Reliability, ride quality, handling and safety are the main focuses here.

Review: Chrysler 300, Editors of ConsumerReports.org

2. Edmunds.com

Edmunds.com editors evaluate the Chrysler 300's safety, interior design and driving experience. They say it's a good value with distinctive styling, but it doesn't make their Top Recommended list.

Review: 2009 Chrysler 300 Review, Editors of Edmunds.com, 2009 Chrysler 300 Review

3. ConsumerGuide.com

ConsumerGuide.com road tests a slew of vehicles, including the Chrysler 300. The 300's overall score is a bit below average for its market segment, but it still receives ConsumerGuide.com's Recommended label -- mostly thanks to the power of its V-8 models.

Review: 2009 Chrysler 300: Road Test, Editors of ConsumerGuide.com

4. Car and Driver

This buyer's guide capsule review outlines the Chrysler 300's pros and cons in a concise way. Editors here find most of the same benefits and drawbacks to the 300 as other sources do, and they point out that the Pontiac G8 is "a more modern version of the same formula."

Review: 2009 Chrysler 300, Editors of Car and Driver

5. Kelley Blue Book

The Chrysler 300 is one of Kelley Blue Book's top recommended sedans. This overview of the 300's performance, comfort and styling is short, but it is user-friendly and easy to read.

Review: 2009 Chrysler 300 Review, Editors of Kelley Blue Book

6. SaferCars.gov

The Chrysler 300 earns good scores in government crash tests, although some other family sedans rate better. The 300 earns a perfect five-star rating in frontal crashes, but only four stars in side and rear impacts.

Review: 5-Star Safety Ratings, Editors of SaferCar.gov

7. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

The Chrysler 300/Dodge Charger is one of the worst performing large sedans in crash tests conducted here. It does a "poor" job protecting occupants in a side crash and a "marginal" job in rear-end collisions, tests show.

Review: Large Family Cars, Editors of Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

8. FuelEconomy.gov

The EPA lists fuel-economy estimates for most cars here. You'll find the Chrysler 300 in the "large cars" category, where you can easily sort and compare cars based on their fuel economy, estimated annual fuel cost and more.

Review: 2009 Large Cars, Editors of FuelEconomy.gov

9. J.D. Power and Associates

The Chrysler 300's dependability ratings improved in this most recent J.D. Power and Associates survey. The 300 was one of the least dependable large cars in the 2008 ratings, but owners now rate it "better than most." The results are based on a 2009 survey of owners who bought their cars in 2006.

Review: 2009 Vehicle Dependability Study -- Large Car, Editors of J.D. Power and Associates

Family Cars Runners Up:

2009 Chevrolet Malibu *Est. $21,605 to $26,880

8 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…

2009 Nissan Altima *Est. $19,900 to $29,380

7 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Globe and Mail…

2009 Toyota Camry *Est. $19,395 to $29,045

7 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Globe and Mail…

2009 Ford Fusion *Est. $19,270 to $27,675

6 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety…

2009 Saturn Aura *Est. $22,655 to $27,250

5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Cars.com…

2009 Ford Taurus *Est. $25,170 to $37,170

5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…

2009 Mercury Sable *Est. $25,120 to $31,230

5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…

2009 Mercury Milan *Est. $21,180 to $27,800

4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Cars.com…

2009 Subaru Legacy *Est. $20,795 to $34,595

4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…

2009 Volkswagen Passat *Est. $28,300

4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety…

2009 Pontiac G8 *Est. $28,250 to $37,610

3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…

2009 Chrysler 300 *Est. $26,665 to $44,160

2 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…

Sponsored Links

Back to top