
- Seating for six
- Big trunk
- Good visibility
- Average or better reliability
- Land-yacht dimensions
- Ancient design, platform
- Lousy fuel economy
- Inconsistent crash-test scores
- Lacks common safety equipment
- Unsupportive seats
- Cheap interior plastics
- Steep depreciation
Critics come to two conclusions about the Mercury Grand Marquis: It's either irredeemably old-fashioned, or it's fashionably old-school. Most critics say the former. They caution buyers that when driving the big Mercury, they'll be mistaken for a cop, a taxi or an elderly person. "How old is it?" Edmunds.com asks rhetorically. "It's so old, its platform debuted when Jimmy Carter was president. It's so old, a cassette deck is an optional extra."
The Grand Marquis is certainly roomy. "The trunk is only slightly smaller than a Smart car," Edmunds.com says. The Grand Marquis is also one of the few cars that still seats six and had a front bench seat, although testers point out that middle passengers have to straddle a big transmission tunnel hump in both front and back.
Testers also say the bench seats don't provide much support for cornering -- not that you'll be doing much of that in a Grand Marquis, anyway, according to most reviews. "Handles like the U.S.S. Nimitz," Edmunds.com says of the Mercury Grand Marquis. TheTruthAboutCars.com, usually very picky, is the lone dissenter here: "The Marquis' composed suspension, marginally-involving steering, torquey mill and RWD orientation make it an honest-to-God hoot in the corners," Sajeev Mehta writes.
A cushy ride is the Grand Marquis' calling card, according to most reviews, although some find it jittery or overly floaty. The Mercury Grand Marquis comes in only one trim, with standard leather seats, a 224-horsepower, 4.6-liter V-8 engine and a four-speed automatic transmission. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates it will get 19 mpg combined (16 city/24 highway), but the Grand Marquis averages only 16 or 17 mpg in real-world tests.
The Grand Marquis wins the "most dependable" large car title in J.D. Power and Associates' latest owner survey, but another major owner survey finds the Grand Marquis' reliability just average. The 2009 Grand Marquis is covered by an average-length warranty -- three years/36,000 miles basic, with five years/60,000 miles for the powertrain.
Some now-common safety equipment is completely missing from the Mercury Grand Marquis, including electronic stability control and side-curtain airbags. Still, the Grand Marquis gets perfect crash-test scores -- but only in government tests conducted by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. When the nonprofit Insurance Institute for Highway Safety simulated a side crash with a pickup or SUV hitting the Grand Marquis at 31 mph, the Grand Marquis did only a "marginal" job protecting occupants. IIHS judged the Grand Marquis' structure and safety cage "poor" overall, and protection for the driver's pelvis and leg area got the same low rating. "Measures taken from the dummy indicate that a fracture of the pelvis would be likely in a crash of this severity," IIHS testers wrote. "Rib fractures and/or internal organ injuries would also be possible." Meanwhile, in the back seat, "The dummy's head was hit by the pillar behind the rear passenger door."
A new Mercury Grand Marquis will lose a great deal of its value very quickly, Kelley Blue Book predicts -- 68 percent in the first year alone. For all of these reasons, reviews steer buyers toward just about any other full-size car, such as the excellent Toyota Avalon (*est. $27,845 to $35,185) or the cheaper Mercury Sable (*est. $25,120 to $31,230) or Ford Taurus (*est. $25,170 to $37,170), which both get outstanding safety ratings.
Although some of the reviews we found for the Mercury Grand Marquis are a few years old, they're still valid because -- as reviews love to point out -- the Grand Marquis hasn't had a major update in eons. Consumer Reports offers the only directly comparative full review we found, ranking the Grand Marquis against the competition. Reviews at ConsumerGuide.com, Edmunds.com, TheTruthAboutCars.com and Car and Driver are also based on hands-on testing. We found official fuel-economy estimates at the EPA, and dissenting opinions about the Grand Marquis' safety at the NHTSA and IIHS. Kelley Blue Book predicts the Grand Marquis' resale value, and J.D. Power and Associates rates its dependability.
Our Sources
1. ConsumerReports.orgDetails/Subscribe
Consumer Reports tests most family sedans on the market, including the Mercury Grand Marquis, and it provides very useful reliability predictions based on past-model-year data from owner surveys. Consumer Reports' testing is geared toward measuring reliability, ride quality, handling and safety.
Review: Mercury Grand Marquis, Editors of ConsumerReports.org
ConsumerGuide.com editors test most cars, reporting scores in a dozen categories. The Mercury Grand Marquis posts the lowest overall score of any large car, with particularly low numbers in steering, handling, braking and value.
Review: 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis: Road Test, Editors of ConsumerGuide.com
3. Edmunds.com
This single-vehicle evaluation judges the Mercury Grand Marquis on its design, performance and comfort. The Grand Marquis has been so outpaced by its competitors, the writer says, that Edmunds.com cannot recommend it.
Review: 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis Review, Editors of Edmunds.com
Family Cars Runners Up:
8 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
7 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Globe and Mail…
7 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Globe and Mail…
6 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety…
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Cars.com…
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Cars.com…
4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
2 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
