
- Outstanding crash-test performance
- Capacious trunk and interior
- Comfortable ride
- Good outward visibility
- Available all-wheel drive
- Low starting price
- Interior a bit nicer than Ford Taurus
- Middling fuel economy
- Not an agile handler
- Boring exterior styling
Reviews usually recommend the Mercury Sable in the same breath as the Ford Taurus (*est. $25,170 to $37,170); the two are platform twins, after all, and experts say they're among the roomiest, safest family sedans you can buy. Although Ford has unveiled a completely overhauled 2010 Taurus, 2009 is the Mercury Sable's final year. Reviewers say the Sable's interior fit and materials are a bit nicer than the Taurus', and its exterior styling is slightly different, but "bland" is the most common adjective critics use to describe either car.
Still, blandness brings some advantages. "One of the first things you'll notice when driving the Sable is how good the all-around visibility is," writes Mike Hanley at Cars.com. Unlike its rival, the distinctively short-windowed Chrysler 300 (*est. $26,665 to $44,160), "there aren't any unusual body panels to compromise visibility" on the Sable. Like the essentially identical Ford Taurus, the driver sits up fairly high in the Mercury Sable. Edmunds.com finds this position "unsporting," but reviewers say drivers who are downsizing from an SUV might like it -- along with the Sable's roomy passenger cabin, "gargantuan" trunk and available all-wheel drive.
You'll find neither all-wheel drive nor a very big trunk in the top-rated full-size sedan, the Toyota Avalon (*est. $27,845 to $35,185), but reviewers say the Avalon is the most luxurious and fuel-efficient full-size family sedan. By contrast, the Mercury Sable's interior is described as merely being "decent" or "appropriate," and its fuel economy is just average. Like the Toyota Avalon and Ford Taurus, "sporty" isn't a word that comes to mind when critics describe the Mercury Sable's handling. "Refined," "comfortable" and "solid" do, although testers say the Sable exhibits pronounced body roll in corners.
Safety is a strong point with the Mercury Sable; it garners the highest possible crash-test ratings at both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Electronic stability control is standard equipment.
The base Mercury Sable (*est. $25,120) offers similar amenities as the entry-level Ford Taurus SE (*est. $25,170), such as cruise control, remote entry, power mirrors, power locks and windows and a power driver's seat. The step-up Sable Premier (*est. $29,380) adds a rear obstacle detection system, dual-zone automatic climate control, heated leather seats, satellite radio and more, for a bit less than the comparably equipped Ford Taurus Limited (*est. $30,670).
Front-wheel-drive Mercury Sables post an Environmental Protection Agency-estimated 21 mpg in mixed driving (18 city/28 highway) -- two mpg less than the Toyota Avalon. Both trim levels offer all-wheel drive for an additional $1,850, but the feature carries a fuel-economy penalty: combined mileage drops to 19 mpg (17 mpg city/24 mpg highway).
All Mercury Sables run on a 263-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6 with a six-speed automatic transmission. Reviews say acceleration is adequate, but the transmission is sometimes slow to downshift. Reliability should be average or better for the Sable, according to sources that track dependability. The Sable is covered by a three-year/36,000-mile basic warranty and five-year/60,000-mile powertrain warranty.
We found the most comprehensive review of the Mercury Sable at Consumer Reports, where experts test all major aspects of the car and also survey owners about its reliability. Edmunds.com, ConsumerGuide.com and Cars.com provide thorough, test-based reviews. Car and Driver and Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine offer very short write-ups. Other sources review single aspects of the Sable -- safety, fuel economy or reliability.
Our Sources
1. ConsumerReports.orgDetails/Subscribe
Consumer Reports finds the Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable virtually identical, and its narratives and ratings are similar for both cars. Experts here test the Taurus/Sable and rate it against similar sedans.
Review: Mercury Sable, Editors of ConsumerReports.org
2. Edmunds.com
Editors here list the same low points for the Mercury Sable as for the Ford Taurus, including a soft brake-pedal feel and body roll in corners. However, they praise the Sable/Taurus' safety and roominess.
Review: 2009 Mercury Sable Review, Editors of Edmunds.com
The 2009 Mercury Sable is a Recommended pick at ConsumerGuide.com, where experts test virtually every vehicle on the market and assign ratings in 11 categories, such as ride quality and value. The Mercury Sable's score is just average for a large car, but editors say it provides a good balance of roominess and performance.
Review: 2009 Mercury Sable: Road Test, Editors of ConsumerGuide.com
Family Cars Runners Up:
8 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
7 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Globe and Mail…
7 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Globe and Mail…
6 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety…
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Cars.com…
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Cars.com…
4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
2 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…

