Page: 6 of 6
Food Processors: Ratings of Sources
Total of 15 Sources
1. ConsumerReports.org
Not Dated
Food Processors and Choppers
by Editors of ConsumerReports.org
Our Assessment

ConsumerReports.org provides ratings on 27 food processors and eight mini choppers. They also offer expert advice on selecting food processors and choppers. Food processors are evaluated on noise level and five essential tasks. Two food processors are selected overall, but editors also make recommendations for smaller- and larger-capacity needs. Two mini choppers are recommended with identical ratings for chopping and pureeing, but editors name one a best buy because it costs half as much as the other.

expand

collapse

2. Cook's Illustrated Magazine
May 2008
Food Processors
by Editors of Cook's Illustrated
Our Assessment Cook's Illustrated magazine tests seven food processors, rating each on their ability to chop, grate, slice vegetables, grind dry ingredients and cut butter into flour for pie crust. The three food processors priced under $100 all fail these tests. The top pick, which comes with a mini-bowl insert, does the best job at prepping vegetables.
3. Cook's Illustrated Magazine
Oct. 2005
Mini Food Processors
by Editors of Cook's Illustrated
Our Assessment Cook's Illustrated tests eight choppers, each with about a 3-cup capacity. Editors test each product's ability to chop almonds and hard cheese, as well as moist items such as ginger and herbs. None of the mini choppers are able to mince parsley. The favorite product easily processes curry and chops almonds. Some models are rated poorly because they overprocess, underprocess or are hard to clean.
The Best Food Processors (Eight-Cup Plus)
by Kristin Donnelly
Our Assessment

Food & Wine evaluates food processors among 76 small appliances in nine categories. We don't know how many food processors are included, but four models receive mention. Kristin Donnelly picks the Oster 10-Cup 3200 as the winner, calling it "an amazing value." The food bowl is notably easy to remove from the base, but it is one of the smallest models tested. The runner-up is the Cuisinart Prep 11 Plus 11-Cup DLC-2011, described as "the mother of all food processors." The reviewer does complain that purees needed a bit of scraping down to come out smooth. Honorable mentions include the KitchenAid 12-Cup KFP750 and the Viking VFP Professional.

expand

collapse

5. Wired Magazine
Oct. 2007
Wired Magazine: Test
by Melissa Wagenberg Lasher
Our Assessment

The Cuisinart Prep 11 Plus 11-Cup DLC-2011 is chosen among four food processors tested by Wired. Testers praise its practical design, multiple speeds, wide feed tube and easy-to-clean touchpad controls. The KitchenAid Ultra Wide Mouth slices, grates, purees and grinds nuts quickly. However, the vegetables have to be cut small enough so that the feed tube plunger is at least halfway down the chute for the blade to start, and some flour seeps out of the lid seam while making dough.

expand

collapse

6. Choice magazine
Aug. 2009
Food Processors: Review and Compare
by Editors of Choice magazine
Our Assessment

Australia's Choice magazine puts 10 food processors through a battery of tests, such as slicing vegetables, grinding breadcrumbs, shredding cheese, kneading pastry crust and emulsifying mayonnaise. Testers also consider ease of use, cleaning and storage. Unfortunately, this recent review includes only one model currently available in the U.S., so it isn't as helpful for U.S. consumers as it is for Australian readers.

expand

collapse

Our Favorite Food Processors
by Editors of Good Housekeeping
Our Assessment

Editors don't disclose the number of models they tested, aside from the three food processors rated here. Each model gets a one-sentence summary, with no reference to performance testing. The KitchenAid 7-Cup KPF720 is a powerful compact model. Editors like the large feed chute on the Hamilton Beach Big Mouth 14-Cup, while the Cuisinart Prep 11 Plus 11-Cup DLC-2011 is their choice for "serious cooks."

expand

collapse

8. Cuisine at Home
Dec. 2006
Food Processors
by Editors of Cuisine at Home
Our Assessment

It doesn't appear that tests were performed specifically for this article in Cuisine at Home magazine. The unidentified author provides a good buyer's guide, but recommendations are based on personal experience rather than a measured comparison test. The author recommends food processors in the $180 to $200 range because "less expensive models just aren't worth the money." Recommended are the Cuisinart Pro Custom 11 DLC-8S and Cuisinart Prep 11 Plus 11-Cup DLC-2011, along with the KitchenAid 12-Cup KFP750 and KitchenAid 12-Cup Ultra Wide Mouth KFPW760.

expand

collapse

9. Cooking.com
As of Oct. 2009
Food Processors and Mini Choppers
by Contributors to Cooking.com
Our Assessment

Cooking.com is a retail website that lets readers post reviews and comments about kitchen gear. Reviews are well organized, and you can easily see how many owners have rated each food processor. The KitchenAid 12-Cup KFP750 averages a near-perfect rating of 4.8 stars by about 150 owners, while the Cuisinart Custom 14 DFP-14BCN receives an equivalent rating from about 100 owners. The KitchenAid 7-Cup KFP720 averages 4.4 stars from more than 150 owners. The KitchenAid Chef's Chopper Series KFC3100 averages 4.5 stars from nearly 100 owners and is the top-rated mini chopper.

expand

collapse

10. Amazon.com
As of Oct. 2009
Food Processors
by Contributors to Amazon.com
Our Assessment Amazon.com features hundreds of owner-written reviews clearly detailing raves and rants about numerous food processor models. The KitchenAid 12-Cup KFP750 food processor and the Black & Decker Ergo EHC650 each receive an average of 4.5 stars from approximately 300 owners. Several other KitchenAid and Cuisinart models receive over 100 favorable reviews from owners.
11. Which? magazine
Not Dated
Food Processor Reviews
by Editors of Which? magazine
Our Assessment Which? magazine is the U.K.-based counterpart to ConsumerReports.org. Although editors put 19 food processors and five mini choppers through stringent tests, the top-rated KitchenAid Ultra Wide Mouth KFPM770 is the only one widely available in the U.S.
12. Macys.com
As of Oct. 2009
Food Processors
by Contributors to Macys.com
Our Assessment The Cuisinart Pro Custom 11 DLC-8S wins the prize as the top-rated food processor at Macys.com, based on more than 75 owner reviews. It earns a rating of 4.8 out of five.
13. Target.com
As of Oct. 2009
Food Processors
by Contributors to Target.com
Our Assessment

The reviews here aren't as numerous as those at Amazon.com or Cooking.com, but the posts are still illuminating. A handful of contributors give a perfect rating to KitchenAid's 12-Cup and 7-Cup food processors, as well as the Black & Decker Ergo EHC650. However, the Black & Decker 10-Cup seems to have durability problems, since two models average a low rating. The Black & Decker FP1510 is now discontinued. Nearly half of the 22 reviews of the Black & Decker Mini MFP200 also receive the lowest rating for durability and user difficulties.

expand

collapse

14. Epinions.com
As of Oct. 2009
Food Processors
by Contributors to Epinions.com
Our Assessment Dozens of models receive owner ratings on Epinions.com, but there are fewer ratings overall than at Amazon.com and Cooking.com, and many of the reviews are quite old. The Cuisinart Pro Custom 11 DLC-2011 has the most reviews, with the majority of 26 owners saying this product is well worth its price tag. Several consumers, though, complain of durability issues.
15. ConsumerGuide.com
As of Oct. 2009
Food Processor Buying Guide
by Editors of ConsumerGuide.com
Our Assessment

Food processors and mini choppers are rated according to value, performance and ease of use. The Cuisinart Pro Custom 11 DLC-8S and Cuisinart Prep 9-Cup DLC-2009 are among the food processors that receive perfect scores. More moderately priced models with perfect scores receive a Best Buy designation. The Black & Decker Ergo EHC650 receives a perfect score and is a Best Buy mini chopper. Although most of the reviews are fairly recent, we give this source a lower credibility rating because there's no information about the reviewers and no disclosure about how products might have been tested.

expand

collapse

Back to top