Sponsored Links

Polar FT60

*Est. $215

Reviewed September 2009
Polar FT60

Best heart-rate monitor

pros
  • Numerous training features
  • User-replaceable battery
  • Comes in men's and women's designs
  • Optional GPS and foot pods
cons
  • Expensive
  • Data uplink costs extra
  • Setup can be confusing
 
 
Where to Buy
 
 
 
5 star:
(13)
4 star:
(6)
3 star:
(2)
2 star:
(0)
1 star:
(4)

Average Customer Review

(25 customer reviews)

for $169.95

Search Reviews

Page 12345
newest | oldest | popular | helpful
Very good HRM, October 16, 2009

I gave this to my husband for his birthday, ever since he has improved his work outs and increased his cardiovascular capacity, plus he is less prone to get injured and he has lost over 10 pounds in 2 months! The Polar FT60 will coach you to fulfill different programs, as increasing your fitness and others, and will make a training program specific for you. The red display can be hard to read in dim lights, but it is not in bright lights (day) or darkness, so it is not really too bad, especially considering that this color goes for much cheaper. The one problem we had was that the data erased itself once, when it should have not. But that problem has not been repeated.

expand

collapse

Fantastic Workout Tool, September 9, 2009

My first heart rate monitor and well worth the money. It is comfortable, not unsightly, packed with features and appears to take a decent amount of abuse. The strap is easy to wash and fits well around all sizes. The weight loss program is simple but great at making you realize just how hard you actually need to work out. (I would guess that without a heart rate monitor most people don't realize how they are not working in their zones at all) with diet and this little tool I have so far lost about 20lbs. Display was easy to read, and while intimidating, it is not complex despite all it can do. The weight graph is fantastic!

expand

collapse

Not what one would expect..., August 22, 2009

I have Polar FT60 for a few weeks. My experience with HRMs is limited to this and OMRON HR-100c. I was impressed by the personaltrainer site, the reviews I read about the product and the fact that the batteries are user-replaceable. Well, things unfortunately are not as they seem. The watch is supposed to have the STAR training feature which (based on the data entered by the user, plus measurements) plays the role of a personal trainer with three possible goals (weight loss, fitness improve/maximize). Problems: 1. The weekly plan produced is vague: It states only how many minutes one should spend in each of the 3 training zones. Should I do it in 2 sessions? 3, 4, 5? It doesn't tell you. As a contrast check the (much more impressive) programs created by the respective site: They give you specific days (depending on a reasonable choice you have made in terms of the number of desired training sessions) and specific time duration for successive sub-sessions. E.g., try 20' in zone 1, then 10' in zone 2 and 10' in zone 1. 2. If I want to follow a session as suggested above, I cannot do it: No timer(s) available to inform me that the first sub-session has ended, so that I should go to the following one! 3. Suppose I must train x minutes in Zone 1 and y minutes in Zone 2 and no minutes in the highest Zone. There is NO way to lock the first 2 zones so that I do not overtrain! 4. The training alarm does not work unless I specifically lock a PARTICULAR zone. What if I forgot myself in the 'warming-up' and my heart-rate is below Zone 1? NO SOUND unless I have locked Zone 1! What if I do not lock any particular zone and my BMP is either below Zone 1 (or above Zone 3)? NO SOUND! And I have tested that with the training sound level at various levels before writing this. The OMRON HR-100C is much better at this. Its sound is stronger (one level but a decent one) and once you set the low and high BMP values, it will beep if you under- or over-train. The display is also clearer and the figures larger and crisper. 6. The Polar strap is supposed to be upto XXL, but it is short a few cm. I had to go to a tailor and put a little extension (4-5cm) to make it fit. The OMRON was OK from the beginning. 7. The OMRON came with a zippered storage case and a mounting bracket. The much more expensive Polar FT60 with none of these... 8. The batteries are user-replaceable, BUT the Polar manual specifically states that once you change the battery, you must also replace the sealing ring on the watch, or else... 9. The calories burned, etc. feature is nice, but its accuracy disputed in the relevant forum. Final remark: Unfortunately the rule "you get what you pay for" is not the case here. For the features offered FT60 is not what I would expect, but it is too late now.

expand

collapse

It didn't look new but it works, August 1, 2009

The watch arrived even earlier than scheduled and it's great. I'm giving 3 stars because the package (outside and inside) didn't seem to be brand new (maybe used? Maybe old and used for display?). There was no protective plastic on the glass and there was data already plugged in. The battery was very low and needed to be replaced after only one time of use! The warranty says that you need to bring it to a Polar store to get the battery replaced otherwise you loose the warranty. There was supposed to be a protection on the battery cover but there was none. We did replace the battery and now we love it. For almost 200$ we expected to buy something new (as the store advertise!).

expand

collapse

Very Happy!, July 27, 2009

I spent a fair amount of time researching which HRM to buy. Getting sold on a Polar was pretty easy, but then you have to figure out which Polar. I didn't care about running which put me into the FT category. I do like "toys" and I do like data, so I settled on the FT60 and I'm glad I did. Setup was easy, just answer the questions. Using it is also easy. It'll start/pause/stop and you can review your workout on the screen. I also like how it calculates a program for me based on my goal and I can see where I am relative to that goal. When I meet or exceed the goal for the week it even displays a trophy on the screen (cute). I upload my data to Polar's website which has been a breeze and it's free. Unlike some of the other Polar models, you can replace the battery in the HRM and the transmitter yourself on this model. A big plus in my opinion.

expand

collapse

Where To Buy
 
 

Polar FT60 Men's Heart Rate Monitor Watch (Black with White Display)

 (25 customer reviews)
Buy new: $239.95 $219.95   17 Used & new from $150.00

In Stock. Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping

 
 
 

Our Sources

1. The New York Times

Danielle Belopotosky tests the Polar FT60 for The New York Times' Gadgetwise blog, finding it comfortable, sturdy and reliable. However, she also says that it takes some time to set up the monitor and there is no lap timer.

Review: Marathon Tech Review: Watches, Danielle Belopotosky, Aug. 18, 2009

2. Runner's World

Runner's World enlists the help of one runner to test the Polar FT60. Bob Parks finds that the device develops a "surprisingly insightful plan," assigning total exercise time and workouts of varying intensities.

Review: Times Are Changing, Bob Parks, July 2009

3. FeedtheHabit.com

Jason Mitchell tests the Polar FT60 (with the optional G1 GPS pod) for several months. He likes the training programs and easy review of workout data, but he thinks the buttons can be hard to press.

Review: Polar FT60 G1 Heart Rate Fitness Watch Review, Jason Mitchell, Nov. 24, 2008

4. Bicycling Magazine

Liz Reap Carlson calls the Polar FT60 one of her "favorite training tools," thanks largely to the personalized training recommendations. Carlson also says the FT60 is easy to use.

Review: Polar FT60 Training Computer, Liz Reap Carlson, Jan. 2009

5. About.com

Paige Waehner, About.com's exercise guide, lists the Polar FT60 as one of the top five heart-rate monitors. She acknowledges that the FT60 is pricey but says its training programs are motivating. (Note: ConsumerSearch is owned by About.com, but the two don't share an editorial affiliation.)

Review: Best Overall Heart Rate Monitors, Paige Waehner, April 22, 2009

6. Amazon.com

Fewer than a dozen owners review the Polar FT60 on Amazon.com. While most agree that it's a great training tool, others complain of erratic heart-rate readings and others regret the lack of a lap timer.

Review: Polar FT60 Men's Heart Rate Monitor Watch (Black with White Display), Contributors to Amazon.com, As of Aug. 2009

7. T3.com

While T3.com calls the Polar FT60 one of the "101 Gadgets You Can't Live Without," this review offers little except a general overview of features.

Review: 101 Gadgets You Can't Live Without, Editors of T3.com, Aug. 8, 2009

Heart Rate Monitors Runners Up:

Polar F6 *Est. $105

4 picks by top review sites.

Polar FS1 *Est. $60

3 picks by top review sites.

Suunto t4c *Est. $215

2 picks by top review sites.

Polar FT40 *Est. $145

2 picks by top review sites.

Timex Easy Trainer T5G941 *Est. $40

2 picks by top review sites.

Polar FT80 *Est. $315

2 picks by top review sites.

     
 
image
Polar F6 Men's Heart Rate Monitor Watch (Black Coal, New Design)
Buy from Amazon.com
from Amazon.com
New: $96.99   
In Stock.
Average Customer Review:  
 
 
 
 
     
 
image
Polar FS1 Heart Rate Monitor Watch (Dark Blue)
Buy from Amazon.com
from Amazon.com
New: $46.00   
In Stock.
Average Customer Review:  
 
 
 
 
     
 
image
Suunto t4c Heart Rate Monitor and Fitness Trainer Watch (Black Volcano)
Buy from Amazon.com
from Amazon.com
New: $170.00   
In Stock.
Average Customer Review:  
 
 
 
 
     
 
image
Polar FT40 Women's Heart Rate Monitor Watch (Green)
Buy from Amazon.com
from Amazon.com
New: $122.33   
In Stock.
Average Customer Review:  
 
 
 
 
     
 
image
Timex T5G941 Heart Rate Monitor Watch
Buy from Amazon.com
from Amazon.com
New: $35.99   
In Stock.
Average Customer Review:  
 
 
 
 
     
 
image
Polar FT80 Heart Rate Monitor Watch (Black)
Buy from Amazon.com
from Amazon.com
New: $259.99   
In Stock.
Average Customer Review:  
 
 
 
 
Sponsored Links

Back to top