
- Stylish exterior and interior design
- Quiet, cushy ride
- Spacious, comfortable cabin
- Rear seat folds forward
- Larger trunk than other hybrid sedans
- Mild hybrid produces small mileage benefit
- Slow acceleration
- Steering lacks sufficient feel
- Lower fuel economy than competitors
- Four-speed automatic transmission
The 2009 Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid gets praise for many of the same highly rated qualities of the conventionally powered Chevy Malibu (*Est. $21,605 to $26,880). Critics say the Malibu Hybrid, like other Chevy Malibu models, is handsomely styled with good driving dynamics and a spacious, comfortable cabin. The hybrid sedan's ride is plush and quiet, but reviewers are mostly lukewarm about its mild hybrid technology, which offers only a slight improvement in fuel economy, yet slower acceleration than the conventional four-cylinder Chevrolet Malibu. Fuel economy is impressive for a midsize family sedan, but falls well below the mileage ratings of other hybrid cars. Car and Driver's Patrick Bedard writes, "Against state-of-the-art hybrids, the Malibu, at its present state of development, seems like too little too late."
With its 164-horsepower, 2.4-liter, four-cylinder, gas-electric powertrain and standard four-speed automatic transmission, the Chevy Malibu Hybrid is rated at 26 mpg city and 34 mpg highway by the Environmental Protection Agency. Many test drivers report averaging around 29 mpg in normal commuting. Reviewers like Edmunds.com's Josh Sadlier point out that the nonhybrid four-cylinder Chevrolet Malibu with a six-speed automatic also gets respectable mileage -- 22 mpg city and 33 mpg highway -- and is a better value; the Malibu 2LT sells for an estimated $24,705 and has more standard equipment than the costlier Malibu Hybrid. The Chevy Malibu Hybrid "drinks a measly 14 percent less gas," Sadlier writes. While the Chevy Malibu Hybrid's electric motor provides some boost to the gas engine while accelerating, most critics say the extra power is not discernable. Some call the Malibu Hybrid underpowered, with its zero-to-60 mph time of a little over 10 seconds, according to Edmunds.com. That's slower than most other hybrid cars. "This is a car for folks who care more about their carbon footprints than merging confidently on the highway," comments Sadlier. Rex Roy, writing for EV-Motoring.com, thinks that "for a midsize sedan the Malibu accelerates just fine."
Chevrolet's hybrid sedan is unable to propel itself on pure electric power the way full-hybrid family sedans such as the Toyota Camry Hybrid (*Est. $26,150) and Ford Fusion Hybrid (*Est. $27,270) can. Instead, the Chevy Malibu's mild-hybrid system saves fuel by shutting down the engine when the car comes to a stop. The engine starts immediately when the brake is released, although with a noticeable vibration, critics add. While all hybrids sacrifice some trunk space for battery storage, the Chevy Malibu Hybrid's smaller battery pack allows a larger trunk, and it retains its practical fold-down rear seat, although the pass-through opening is smaller because the battery pack partially obstructs it. The Malibu Hybrid's trunk volume is 13.3 cubic feet versus 15.1 cubic feet in the nonhybrid Malibu. The Toyota Camry Hybrid, with its sizable battery pack, has just 10.6 cubic feet of luggage capacity.
Reviewers say that the Chevy Malibu Hybrid's less complex mild-hybrid setup makes it the least costly hybrid system, but many critics feel it's still not worth the added price, even if the premium is lower than competing hybrids. Although the Malibu Hybrid is less expensive, reviews say hybrid-car fans are likely to be more satisfied with other midsize hybrid sedans such as the Toyota Camry Hybrid, Nissan Altima Hybrid (*Est. $26,650), the 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid or its chassis-twin, the 2010 Mercury Milan Hybrid (*Est. $27,500). Another alternative to the Malibu Hybrid is the nearly identical, yet more expensive Saturn Aura Hybrid (*Est. $26,240), which shares the Malibu's chassis, powertrain and general driving characteristics. Of the Chevy Malibu Hybrid, Car and Driver's Bedard summarizes, "it doesn't seem like a wise way to spend $3,950 more than a base Malibu to save a minor amount of fuel." EV-Motoring.com's Roy sees it from a different and interesting angle, noting "in this era of $2,000 navigation and entertainment system options, the extra cost for the Malibu Hybrid may not strike people as egregious."
Car and Driver has an excellent comparison test between four midsize hybrid sedans in which the Chevy Malibu Hybrid takes last place. Edmunds.com has an objective single-car road test with a summary of pros and cons. A road test on Iguida.com gives a frank perspective on the relative value of the mild-hybrid system compared to full-hybrid rivals. EV-Motoring.com offers one of the more thorough and easy-to-understand explanations of the mild-hybrid technology, along with a road-test evaluation. In a subscription-only review, ConsumerReports.org covers the Malibu Hybrid. ConsumerGuide.com names the Chevrolet Malibu family sedan a Best Buy and includes the hybrid model in its overall evaluation. HybridCars.com discusses competitors in its road-test review, and Motor Week's article is a comparison with the Toyota Camry Hybrid. Shorter descriptive reviews can be found at Kelley Blue Book and CarList.com.
Our Sources
1. Car and DriverDetails/Subscribe
Car and Driver's typically thorough comparison test pits four midsize hybrid sedans against each other. With the only mild-hybrid system of the four, the 2009 Chevy Malibu Hybrid is called "too little too late." Its average 29 mpg is the lowest mileage in the group, and it is slowest to reach 60 mph, requiring 9.2 seconds. Although the Chevy hybrid family sedan's price is also lowest in the test, "it doesn't seem like a wise way to spend $3,950 more than a base Malibu to save a minor amount of fuel," Patrick Bedard says.
Review: 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid vs. Camry Hybrid, Altima Hybrid and Malibu Hybrid, Patrick Bedard, Feb. 2009
2. Edmunds.com
In this full road test, Edmunds.com editor Josh Sadlier says the Malibu Hybrid consumes only about 14 percent less fuel than a nonhybrid, four-cylinder Malibu. The hybrid test car averaged 23 mpg. He points out that the Malibu Hybrid feels underpowered, due in part to its "outdated" four-speed automatic transmission. The start-stop transition "can be a bit abrupt, but it's admirably quick," Sadlier says.
Review: Test Drive: 2009 Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid -- Mild Hybrid Charm at a Mildly Higher Price, Josh Sadlier
3. Iguida.com
This candid road-test review calls the Malibu Hybrid "a marketing strategy dressed as a car." The writer says the Malibu is "appealing, with fine room for four adults, five in a pinch," with driving behavior that is similar to the conventional four-cylinder Malibu. But he says the hybrid technology "doesn't deliver what's expected of a modern gas-electric automobile."
Review: 2009 Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid -- Halfway Hybrid, Chuck Giametta, Jan. 6, 2009
Hybrid Cars Runners Up:
5 picks including: Car and Driver, Edmunds.com…
4 picks including: CarReview.com, Edmunds.com…
3 picks including: Car and Driver, Edmunds.com…
3 picks including: Car and Driver, Los Angeles Times…
2 picks including: Car and Driver, Edmunds.com…
2 picks including: Cars.com, The New York Times…
2 picks including: Edmunds.com, New Car Test Drive…
1 pick including: Car and Driver, Cars.com…

