Page: 8 of 8
Internet Security Software: Ratings of Sources
Total of 13 Sources

For an explanation of how we rank reviews, see our ratings criteria page.

1. PCMag.com
Feb. 2, 2009
The Best Security Suites for 2009
by Neil J. Rubenking
Our Assessment

PCMag reviews 11 full Internet security suites in a large roundup. Neil Rubenking thoroughly tests and compares the programs. In addition to an overall rating, the main components of each suite are tested and discussed. If you won't use a firewall or spam filters, for example, you can ignore the overall ratings and pick a program that excels in the areas that matter most to you. Rubenking uses test results from several scientific testing labs, while other reviewers rely on one or two. Norton Internet Security 2009 gets the Editors' Choice rating.

expand

collapse

2. PC World
Jan. 22, 2009
Top Internet Security Suites: Paying for Protection
by Erik Larkin
Our Assessment

PC World tests, rates and ranks nine Internet security suites. The magazine doesn't conduct its own performance testing; it outsources testing to AV-Test.org. The reviews are substantive and balanced, complete with useful comparative charts and test reports. This thorough approach is the best we found. Norton Internet Security 2009 is the top pick, with an honorable mention going to BitDefender Internet Security 2009. Trend Micro Internet Security Pro 2009 finishes last in the review and is not recommended.

expand

collapse

3. Which.co.uk
As of Mar. 2009
Security Software Review
by Editors of Which?
Our Assessment British consumer magazine Which? rates and scores all types of security software, including security suites. The magazine uses superb testing methodology, but description is minimal and superficial. Each program earns a total score and subcategory ratings for antivirus, anti-spyware, anti-spam, firewall, parental control, backup and overall performance. Two suites are given Best Buy designations.
4. CNet.com
As of Mar. 2009
Antivirus and filtering
by Robert Vamosi
Our Assessment

CNET reviews most of the major security suites. The reviews focus on usage, installation, interface, performance and support, but key factors like removal problems and conflicts with other programs are not addressed. Robert Vamosi gives the highest rating to Norton Internet Security 2009, which he says "hits all the right security notes" and "might even win back some jaded anti-Symantec folks." User reviews add additional information and insight.

expand

collapse

5. PCAdvisor.co.uk
As of Mar. 2009
Security Suite Reviews
by Editors of PC Advisor
Our Assessment British magazine PC Advisor reviews the current versions of 12 security suites. The magazine gives each product an overall rating and subcategory ratings for ease of use, features and value. Performance testing is notably missing from the ratings. All ratings are high and mostly the same, but Norton Internet Security 2009 earns the magazine's Recommended award.
6. WebUser
As of Mar. 2009
Internet Security Suites Round Up
by Roland Waddilove
Our Assessment

Britain's WebUser regularly reviews security software. Reviews are short but occasionally comparative. Anti-virus ratings are based on results from independent testing labs. Issues like system drag are only briefly addressed. Norton Internet Security 2009 just edges out McAfee Internet Security 2009 for the magazine's Gold award on the basis of its "unbroken virus detection record," though McAfee is said to be better in some way and earns a Silver award.

expand

collapse

7. ITReviews.co.uk
As of Mar. 2009
Security Software Reviews
by Editors of IT Reviews
Our Assessment

This U.K. website provides reviews of several current suites, some of which aren't sold in the U.S. Discussion isn't excessive, but a good amount of attention is paid to the important issue of a suite's impact on system performance. Security performance evaluations are based, it seems, on testing by independent labs, but that isn't consistently reported. Suites are not extensively compared or ranked, though some do well enough in reviewers' eyes to earn a Recommended award.

expand

collapse

8. Computer Active
As of Mar. 2009
Antivirus & Firewalls
by Paul Lester, Cliff Joseph, Paul Monckton
Our Assessment This British site is the online companion to a print magazine. Ratings are provided, but reviews are short and testing is not well explained. Bitdefender Total Security 2009 is the only suite to earn a perfect rating and Computeract!ve's Buy It award.
9. Secunia
Oct. 2008
Internet Security Suite Test
by Editors of Secunia
Our Assessment

Secunia describes itself as "a vulnerability intelligence provider." It tests and verifies public vulnerability reports and conducts its own independent research. This PDF file describes detailed testing of 12 Internet security suites against known software exploits. Norton Internet Security is the hands down winner, even though it only could catch 20 percent of all the exploit tests and 31 percent of the important test cases.

expand

collapse

10. Amazon.com
As of Mar. 2009
Internet Security and Filtering Software
by Contributors to Amazon.com
Our Assessment

Amazon.com is a good source of user reviews on Internet security software, but the degree of coverage varies widely from one product to the next. Entries tend to be more detailed here than at CNET where contributors often post only a line or two. Norton Internet Security 2009 earns a solid overall rating following nearly 120 user reviews. BitDefender, Kaspersky and McAfee also have lots of feedback, but don't score as highly.

expand

collapse

11. ConsumerReports.org
Sept. 2008
Best Security Software
by Editors of Consumer Reports
Our Assessment

Consumer Reports tests nine popular security suites, one managed online service, and one free-software compilation. All the tested suites are previous versions, so this report is outdated. Consumer Reports heavily weights spam filtering into its ratings, while not specifically testing firewall defenses. Antivirus and anti-spyware effectiveness are rated, and features have an apparently equal weight. System conflicts and system drag aren't mentioned. Conclusions differ widely from those of reviewers we rate more highly.

expand

collapse

12. Information Week
Feb. 9, 2008
5 Great, Lesser-known Security Suites
by Serdar Yegulalp
Our Assessment

Business technology magazine InformationWeek reviews ZoneAlarm along with a professional security program and three semi-suites. The reviews are far more informative than evaluative. Programs aren't really compared and aren't rated. The intention is to give readers an idea of what's available and not as well known as the best sellers. Still, Serdar Yegulalp points out some weaknesses and shortcomings in each program. He seems to be most impressed with ESET Smart Security and least impressed with the previous version of Windows Live OneCare. Most suites have been updated since this article was published, so it is now dated.

expand

collapse

13. TopTenReviews.com
Not Dated
2009 Internet Security Suites Software Product Comparisons
by Editors of TopTenReviews.com
Our Assessment This site ranks 10 Internet security suites. The reviews are uneven and unconvincing, but the comparison chart is helpful. The chart shows whether programs achieved certification from major independent antivirus, anti-spyware and firewall testing labs. The chart also shows program features and capabilities.

Back to top