
Not only is the 2012 Land Rover LR4 one of the best vehicles when it comes to adverse driving conditions, it also has an elegant and luxuriously appointed interior that wows reviewers. That said, the 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (Base MSRP: $26,995 to $54,470), is an equally strong competitor off road, and delivers great on-pavement performance, too. In addition, the Jeep starts at a lower price, and higher-spec models don't skimp on luxury features.
The Land Rover LR4 off-road specific features include a locking rear differential, hill descent control and a Terrain Response System, as Land Rover calls it, that allows the driver to easily change the vehicle's settings for specific road surface conditions.
Experts like the LR4's powerful V8; Edmunds.com calls it "a stout performer both on pavement and in the wilderness." The downside to all that grunt (and 7,700 towing capacity) is lousy fuel economy: The LR4 is estimated to achieve just 14 mpg in combined city/highway driving, making it one of the least fuel-efficient vehicles available, period.
Many reviewers point out that if you're looking for luxury and you don't need the heavy-duty off-road capability or towing capacity, that there are more practical options, like the universally well-regarded 2012 Acura MDX (Base MSRP: $43,030 to $52,655).
There are no crash-test results for the 2012 Land Rover LR4.
EPA Fuel Economy Estimates
12 mpg city / 17 mpg highway / 14 mpg combined
NHTSA Safety Ratings:
Front Impact: Not tested
Side Impact: Not tested
Rollover Resistance: Not tested
Overall: Not tested
IIHS Safety Ratings:
Front Offset Impact: Not tested
Side Impact: Not tested
Roof Strength: Not tested
For additional details, see our 2010 review
The 2012 Land Rover LR4 sees some audio and navigation system upgrades, but otherwise it's basically been unchanged the last couple of years. Our report on the 2010 Land Rover features more comprehensive insights into what reviewers say about this model.
Our Sources
1. Edmunds.com
Edmunds.com provides a comprehensive overview of the 2012 Land Rover LR4, with firsthand observations covering its driving performance on and off road, comfort and amenities, and overall utility.
Review: 2012 Land Rover LR4, Editors of Edmunds.com
2. ConsumerSearch.com
The 2012 Land Rover LR4 hasn't changed much since our last comprehensive report covering the 2010 model. This report delivers a more detailed look at what reviewers have to say, with links to pertinent sources.
Review: 2010 Land Rover LR4, Editors of ConsumerSearch.com, July 2010
3. FuelEconomy.gov
The 2012 Land Rover LR4 is no prize when it comes to fuel efficiency. It manages just 12 mpg city/17 mpg highway/14 mpg combined, which is inferior to most other midsize SUVs.
Review: 2012 Ford Explorer, U.S. Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency
7 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
6 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
6 picks by top review sites.
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
4 picks including: ConsumerGuide.com, FuelEconomy.gov…
4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
2 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
2 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
1 pick including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
|
Sponsored Links are keyword-targeted advertisements provided through the Google AdWords™ program. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by Google. For information about these Google ads, go to adwords.google.com. Google may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your Web browser. Information from this cookie may be used by Google to help provide advertisers with more targeted advertising opportunities. For more information about Google's privacy policy, including how to opt out, go to www.google.com/ads/preferences. By clicking on Sponsored Links you will leave ConsumerSearch.com. The web site you will go to is not endorsed by ConsumerSearch. |