See All Minimalist Shoes

Nike Free Run+2 Review

*Est. $80
Reviewed
August 2012
by ConsumerSearch
Nike Free Run+2

Nike Free Run+2 Review

Pros
  • Tight, foot-hugging fit
  • Minimal seams
  • Lightweight
  • Roomy toebox
Cons
  • Thicker sole than other "minimalist" shoes
  • Limited arch support
Where to Buy
 

As minimalist running has become more popular, a category of running shoes that straddle the line between traditional and barefoot-style shoes (like the Vibram FiveFingers Bikila) has emerged. These shoes are lightweight, have minimal support features and maximum flexibility, but provide more protection than a true barefoot-type shoe. Shoes in the Nike Free series are sometimes referred to as "reduced running shoes" or "transitional minimalist running shoes," and the Free Run+ 2 falls into this category. Since its original incarnation, the model has earned a loyal following. In fact, Nike boasts of two clinical studies that say the shoe helps increase the activity of smaller muscle groups, which may help boost running efficiency and decrease pain and injury. The Free Run+ 2 was introduced in April 2011, and reviewers say the shoe is equal to if not better than the previous incarnation.

At about 9 ounces (for the men's version), the Nike Free Run+ 2 isn't the lightest minimalist-style running shoe available. Plus, it sits 25 mm off the ground -- 10 mm lower than traditional running shoes but substantially higher than other minimalist shoes. The Vibram FiveFingers Bikila, by comparison, sits just 7.2 mm off the ground. Despite these issues, reviewers say the shoe's comfort and flexibility make the Free Run+ 2 an ideal pick for those interested in more minimalist running. The shoe is often praised for its roomy toebox, minimal seams and no-socks-needed interior. Some users say that runners who like more stability features should consider a more traditional running shoe. Plus, while the Free Run+ 2 is ideal for shorter mileage or as a race-day shoe, it should be alternated with other styles or models long term.

We found the most vetted reviews of the Nike Free Run+ 2 at Runner's World and Running Times magazines, both of which are known for their short but well-researched evaluations. Runner's World's quarterly running-shoe guide is considered the go-to source for model reviews. Buzzillions.com features nearly 200 reviews from loyal Free Run+ users that vary in length and detail, but are almost uniformly positive. We also found a large collection of user reviews at Nike.com.

Our Sources

1. Runner's World

Runner's World conducts the best testing of running shoes. Volunteers road-test shoes and provide comments on comfort and performance. Here, the Nike Free Run+ earns praise for the "foot-hugging fit, light weight and minimal seams." Some testers say that the shoe is remarkably comfortable, but it isn't supportive enough for high-mileage runs.

Review: Winter 2010 Running Shoe Guide, Warren Greene, Martyn Shorten, Dec. 2010

2. RunningTimes.com

Running Times features several detailed annual reviews of new running shoes, but their methodology isn't explained. While they don't compare, rank or rate running shoes, their evaluations are helpful, particularly when looking for information on a particular shoe. Brian Metzler says the Nike Free Run+ is more flexible and supportive than the previous Free 5.0 incarnation and should be considered a valuable training tool.

Review: Training Shoe: Nike Free Run+, Brian Metzler, Oct. 2010

3. Zappos.com

Zappos.com features more than 300 very enthusiastic reviews of the Nike Free Run+ 2. Most of the comments are very short, but the shoe gets positive feedback on comfort, stability and style. The one critique is that the shoe is not as durable as more traditional running shoes.

Review: Nike Free Run+ 2, Contributors to Zappos.com, As of Aug. 2012

4. Nike.com

More than 150 customers provide feedback on the brand's Free Run+ 2 at Nike.com. The reviews are short and positive, with most users saying the shoe is lightweight, flexible and very comfortable. While the Free Run+ 2 isn't particularly well-suited for longer distances, reviewers say they're ideal as a speed or strength-training shoe.

Review: Nike Free Run+2 Running Shoe, Contributors to Nike.com, As of Aug. 2012

5. Buzzillions.com

Buzzillions.com aggregates user reviews from top online retail sites including Zappos.com and REI.com. Here, about 200 owners give the Nike Free Run+ an average 4.6 out of 5 stars. Reviews vary in detail but provide good insight into the pros and cons of the shoe. Most users say the cushioned, lightweight shoe is excellent for shorter mileages or efficiency running. Others, however, say those who need a bit more support should look elsewhere.

Review: Nike Free Run+ Running Shoes, Contributors to Buzzillions.com, As of Aug. 2011

Back to top