Multifunction Printers: Ratings of Sources
Total of 18 Sources
For an explanation of how we rank reviews, see our ratings criteria page.
Multifunction Printers
by Editors of PCMag.com
Our AssessmentPCMag.com regularly reviews multifunction printers, and the volume of reviews offers an excellent frame of reference. Reviewers do an excellent job of comparing and reporting relative speeds complete with comparison charts, but we'd like to see direct comparisons of print quality as well. Though not every specification is tested, what testing is done is very good, and the reviews are more substantive than those from most other computer magazines and websites.
All-in-One Printer Ratings
by Editors of ConsumerReports.org
Our AssessmentConsumerReports.org doesn't date this printer report, but it has been updated at least since late 2010, and most models are current. In the ratings chart, each tested model gets scores for photo, text, graphics, scan and copy quality. Users are also invited to add comments on each printer. Unfortunately, editors don't have anything to say about ease of installation, setup or networking.
Top 10 Inkjet Multifunction Printers
by Melissa Riofrio
Our AssessmentThis chart lists PC World's current top 10 inkjet multifunction printers -- four from Canon, four from Epson and two from HP. However, many of them don't actually rate that highly; most are judged barely above average, with 3.5 stars out of a possible 5. Links from the list lead to full reviews, which include test results but generally do not compare printers directly.
Multifunction Devices -- Reviews
by Editors of PC World (Australia)
Our AssessmentAustralia's edition of PC World regularly reviews multifunction printers. A few of the reviews here have been picked up from the American version of PC World, but most are written by Australian editor Campbell Simpson. Simpson's reviews are not especially lengthy, but they generally cover the key issues, such as setup, speed and quality. Many reviews also include a note on the manufacturer's environmental policy -- an interesting tidbit that isn't included in American sources. Descriptions of output quality are very good, but not as revealing as reproductions of text and photo prints would be. The Canon Pixma MG5220 (sold as the MG5250 in Australia) earns an Editors' Choice recommendation, and the Epson WorkForce 320 is named a Best Buy.
Multifunction Printers
by Editors of CNET
Our AssessmentCNET reviews dozens of multifunction printers each year, and all types are covered. Reviews spend more time on design and features than performance, but comparison charts do show the print speeds of each model relative to the competition. (Older reviews compare image quality as well.) This site also includes reviews from users, some of which contrast starkly with the conclusions drawn by editors. Printers with above-average reviews from the editors may get below-average ratings from users, and vice versa.
Best Printers 2011
by David Gilbert
Our AssessmentThis roundup of printers covers the best models in several categories, including all-in-ones. Although only a short summary review is provided for each printer, there are also links to the full, detailed reviews by Simon Williams, which include test results for speed and cost of use. However, some key areas are ignored even in the full reviews; scanning performance, for example, is not evaluated at all. Also, although product pictures are helpful, it would be nice to see print samples as well. Many of the models reviewed at this British site are not available in the United States.
Multifunction Printer Reviews
by Editors of PC Advisor
Our AssessmentThis British magazine reviews many multifunction printers, but not all are available in the United States. PC Advisor uses lots of writers, so the review quality can vary quite a bit; some reviews are reprinted from other sources, such as PC World, which is owned by the same publishing house.
Top-Rated Multifunction Printers
by Editors of Macworld
Our AssessmentMacworld is a good place for Mac users to find compatible multifunction printers. Though the reviews are not directly comparative, scanning and printing operations are subjected to timed trials. Another nice feature of these reviews is that print and scan/copy quality are evaluated by a jury rather than by a single reviewer. However, most of the multifunction printers on Macworld's top-10 list actually get fairly middling reviews; two HP laser models earn ratings of 4 stars out of 5, but both are discontinued.
All-in-One Printers: Top Picks
by Peter Piazza
Our AssessmentPeter Piazza, About.com's guide to printers/scanners, maintains a small but fairly up-to-date review database. Piazza doesn't compare printers with each other, but the reviews are easy to read and based on hands-on testing, including comments on start-up times, installation and print speeds. This site is worth a look once you narrow down your choice. (Note: ConsumerSearch is owned by About.com, but the two don't share an editorial affiliation.)
Top 10 Color Laser Multifunction Printers
by Melissa Riofrio
Our AssessmentIn this list, Melissa Riofrio names PC World's top 10 color laser MFPs. None of them actually rates all that highly, however; the top star rating here is 3.5 out of a possible 5. Discussion here is cursory, but links lead to more complete reviews, which tend to center primarily on a printer's features and setup rather than on performance. The Brother MFC-9970CDW is the top pick, described as fast and inexpensive to run.
Printer Reviews
by Editors of PC Pro
Our AssessmentBritain's PC Pro reviews and rates a few multifunction printers mixed in with standalone printers. Each all-in-one printer gets a short report that delves into the high and low points, but not in much detail. Printers are not directly compared in the write-ups, but they are given numerical scores and ranked on the landing page, so it's easy to see how editors think they stack up. Unfortunately, the quality of these reviews varies greatly, and the numerical scores aren't always consistent with the overall conclusions of the reviews. Navigating the site is a real hassle as well: There is no way to separate the all-in-ones from the other printers, and there is no way to sort out only the PC Pro Recommended models to narrow down the list. Moreover, since this is a U.K. site, many of the reviewed printers are not available in the United States.
Printer Reviews
by Mike Pasini
Our AssessmentMike Pasini reviews a handful of printers each year. Reviews are exhaustive, covering everything from installation to maintenance. Although they are not strictly comparative, reviews often refer to competing models in passing. However, since there's no direct comparison and no rating system, this site isn't really useful for finding top-rated models (though it can be very informative about specific models once you've narrowed your choices down). Another problem is that several of the "new" models reviewed on this site are have been discontinued or replaced with newer versions.
Reviews
by Editors of HardwareCentral.com
Our AssessmentHardwareCentral.com has reviews for a few multifunction devices scattered among its other printer reviews. There are no direct comparisons between models, but each printer is graded on a five-point scale in three different categories: features, performance and value. While no all-in-one printer reviewed within the past three years earns top marks in every category, a few models earn overall scores of 12 or 13 out of 15. No new reviews for multifunction printers have been added to the site since late 2010.
Inkjet Printer and Laser Printer Reviews
by Editors of ITReviews.com
Our AssessmentThis British site is a prolific reviewer of printers, testing several models each month, and many of the tested models are all-in-one printers. Reviews are not terribly long but reasonably substantive, even though editors don't document the testing very well. Newer reviews on this site (after April 2011) evaluate printers on a five-point scale; other reviews, though usually balanced, do little to help readers toward a decision.
All-In-One Printers
by Contributors to Amazon.com
Our AssessmentCustomer satisfaction among Amazon.com contributors is generally good, as most all-in-one printers have high average ratings, particularly Canon and Epson models. In general, more expensive printers tend to garner better-than-average reviews. Having lots of reviews is helpful, as it smoothes out the natural unevenness of user-written reviews. A box that contrasts the most helpful positive and negative reviews is also useful.
Readers' Choice Awards 2011: Printers
by Ben Gottesman
Our AssessmentPCMag.com conducts annual surveys of its subscribers. Readers rate printer manufacturers (though not individual models) on their reliability, tech support and frequency of repair. They also say how likely they would be to recommend the brand to others. Brother and Canon are the two top-rated brands, with overall ratings of 8.2 and 8.1 out of a possible 10, respectively. Canon earns the highest ratings for inkjet multifunction printers, as well as monochrome laser MFPs; Brother makes the best color laser MFPs.
Multi Functional Printers
by Editors of TestFreaks.com
Our AssessmentTestFreaks.com compiles scores from professional and user reviews of scanners and then ranks and sorts them. While useful for getting an overall picture of opinions on various models, TestFreaks.com provides little new information, and it is unclear how its "Freak Score" is calculated. Since the sources used by TestFreaks.com overlap with our other sources, we have used this site only for tracking down additional reviews on our top-rated models.
Archive for the 'Peripherals' Category
by Ryan McLaughlin
Our AssessmentJustTechn.com has reviewed three multifunction printers in the past two years, but only one of the three is currently available: the Epson Artisan 835, which earns a middling rating of 3.5 stars out of 5 overall. This rating reflects a combination of scores in six categories: features, design, performance, warranty, support and price. Reviews are fairly detailed and include not only product photos but print samples as well -- a useful feature that seldom shows up in professional reviews. The site has potential, but it's currently hindered by its limited collection of MFP reviews, which are mixed in with reviews for other peripherals like mice and keyboards. Also, the ratings standards are not well explained.