
Reviews say GIMP 2.6 -- GNU Image Manipulation Program -- is an excellent free alternative to Adobe Photoshop CS4 (*est. $665), with editing tools that include layers. Its price and capabilities are great, but it has two main drawbacks. It can be sluggish, and perhaps more important, difficult to learn to use. However, reviews of GIMP 2.6 say it's getting much easier to use. If you need a program as powerful as Adobe Photoshop CS4 but would rather get it free, GIMP 2.6 is an excellent choice. Beginners and intermediate users will find Adobe Photoshop Elements 7 (or Elements 6 for Mac) (*est. $80) much easier to learn to use.
GIMP is reviewed briefly at both Download.com and at PC World, but these two sites also provide a good amount of user feedback (though not all of it is for the latest version). The latest version of the program (GIMP 2.6) is also covered in an illustrated review at Brighthub.com. Because there are notable improvements in GIMP 2.6, a review of an older version of GIMP at PC Magazine is slightly less useful. A comparison test at Which? magazine (the U.K. equivalent to Consumer Reports in the U.S.) also covers an earlier version. About.com briefly reviews GIMP, but it's not clear which version is covered.
Our Sources
1. Download.com
Download.com's editors give GIMP a perfect five-star rating, saying its developers have succeeded in making it easier to use, and that it "provides professional tools that can stand against the big boys." Over 450 users give GIMP (including earlier versions) a composite four-star rating.
Review: Gimp 2.6.4, Editors of Download.com and Contributors
This brief review says The GIMP 2.6 compares favorably to Adobe Photoshop for professional photo-editing tools. Of the 200 or so users rating GIMP here, only about 75 percent recommend it, but they may be rating an earlier version.
Review: GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP), Preston Gralla, Dec. 18, 2008
Although this anonymous writer lacks the automatic credibility of someone writing for a site like PC World, this review of The GIMP 2.6 is well-illustrated and objective. An interesting observation is that the GIMP interface isn't inferior to that of Photoshop -- just different.
Review: A Review of GIMP 2.6.2, "Roy", Nov. 8, 2008
In this review of a slightly earlier version of GIMP, the software gets a good rating, with editors praising its versatility but criticizing it as sluggish and lacking polish. The interface makes it tough to use, with a steep learning curve.
Review: GIMP 2.4.7, John R. Quain, Sept. 4, 2008
5. Which? magazineDetails/Subscribe
The U.K.'s Which? magazine includes GIMP 2.4 in its unbiased testing, naming it one of the "five best buys." However, it ranks below Adobe Photoshop Elements and Corel Paint Shop Pro X2, which are much easier to use.
Review: Photo-Editing Software Review, Editors of Which? magazine
6. About.com
Sue Chastain, About.com's guide to graphics software, recommends 10 free photo-editing programs, ranking GIMP second but without a full review or documenting any testing -- or even clarifying which version she's talking about. (Note: ConsumerSearch is owned by About.com, but the two don't share an editorial affiliation.)
Review: Top 10 Free Photo Editors for Windows, Sue Chastain
Photo-Editing Software Runners Up:
4 picks by top review sites.
3 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
|
Corel Paint Shop Pro Photo X2 Ultimate
Average Customer Review: |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Sponsored Links are keyword-targeted advertisements provided through the Google AdWords™ program. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by Google. For information about these Google ads, go to adwords.google.com. Google may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your Web browser. Information from this cookie may be used by Google to help provide advertisers with more targeted advertising opportunities. For more information about Google's privacy policy, including how to opt out, go to www.google.com/ads/preferences. By clicking on Sponsored Links you will leave ConsumerSearch.com. The web site you will go to is not endorsed by ConsumerSearch. |