2009 Suzuki Equator

*Est. $17,220 to $28,550
Reviewed
June 2009
Email

Pros
  • Off-road prowess
  • Powerful optional V-6
  • Big towing capacity for its size
  • Long powertrain warranty
  • Flat rear floor
  • Standard side airbags
  • Sprayed-in bed liner with bed dividers
Cons
  • Poor rear crash ratings
  • No regular cab
  • Engine and road noise
  • Ride quality gets mixed reviews
  • Crew-cab backseat tight for adults
  • Big turning circle

Suzuki Equator is fun to drive, good off-road

The Suzuki Equator is new for 2009 -- in a way. It's actually a rebadged Nissan Frontier (*Est. $17,460 to $29,740). Since the two pickup trucks are almost identical, they share almost all of the same pros and cons. Reviews say neither quite measures up to the best compact pickup, the Toyota Tacoma (*Est. $15,170 to $27,075).

However, the Equator achieves a major coup at Petersen's Four Wheel and Off-Road magazine: it walks off with the 2009 4x4 of the Year title, right under the noses of the new Dodge Ram 1500 (*Est. $21,270 to $43,240), Ford F-150 (*Est. $21,565 to $44,355) and Hummer H3T (*Est. $30,750). All the pickups were tested in off-road trim.

"The fact is it was just more fun to drive, especially off road," editors say of the Equator. It excels in the sand and places highly in rock crawling, hill climbing, high-speed dirt and asphalt testing. Editors say they were very surprised that a "nondescript midsize truck" with no locking front differential could outscore the Hummer, but the Equator turned out to be a more well-rounded off-road machine.

Petersen's contest is only open to new models, so the Nissan Frontier -- which reviewers say is no off-road slouch -- wasn't invited. However, experts point out that the Suzuki Equator does have a few advantages over its near twin. First, Suzuki offers a very long, fully transferable powertrain warranty (seven years/100,000 miles); Nissan's coverage is for the standard five years, 60,000 miles. Both trucks carry the usual three-year, 36,000-mile basic warranty.

Second, the Suzuki Equator pickup includes front side airbags as standard equipment; they're optional on the Nissan Frontier. Without those airbags, the Nissan Frontier does only a "marginal" job protecting occupants in side crash tests at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Experts there have not yet tested the Equator, although they have already assigned it ratings of "good" for front crash protection and "poor" for rear crash protection, based on the Frontier's performance.

Finally, some critics think the Equator's slightly chunkier front-end treatment makes it look tougher than the Nissan Frontier. "We prefer the looks of the Suzuki, which definitely has that square-jawed truck look that seems to be popular these days," says Jeremy Korzeniewski at Autoblog.com. Edmunds.com can't decide: "Arguably more handsome than its platform mate (then again, maybe not)," editors say of the Equator.

Equator shares engines with the Nissan Frontier

Like the Nissan Frontier and Toyota Tacoma pickups, reviewers say the Suzuki Equator tows a lot for its size (6,500 pounds max). The Equator's maximum payload is listed at 1,471 pounds, about 100 pounds less than the Frontier and Tacoma.

Suzuki is marketing the Equator toward people who already own Suzuki motorcycles and all-terrain vehicles. Accordingly, the Suzuki website labels the Equator Extended Cab with little icons showing that it can seat four people while hauling an ATV in its 6-foot bed. (The extended-cab Equator's forward-facing rear jump seats are cramped, however, according to critics)  The Suzuki Equator Crew Cab can seat five with its 60/40 split fold-up rear bench and haul a motorcycle in its 5-foot bed (a 6-foot bed is optional). Like the Nissan Frontier, the Suzuki Equator offers no regular cab.

Both of the Nissan Frontier's engines find their way into the Suzuki Equator's engine bay -- the base 152-horsepower, 2.5-liter four-cylinder and the stronger 261-horsepower, 4.0-liter V-6. To get the best fuel economy, choose the base engine, five-speed manual transmission and rear-wheel drive; you'll get an estimated 21 mpg in mixed driving (19 mpg city and 23 mpg highway). That's one mpg less overall than the best Tacoma.

Step up to the V-6 and five-speed automatic transmission, and fuel economy plunges to 17 mpg overall (15 mpg city and 20 mpg highway), according to government estimates. Add four-wheel drive and it falls again, to 16 mpg overall (15 mpg city and 19 mpg  highway).

Equator trim lines, options

The base Suzuki Equator (*Est. $17,220 to $23,210) comes in either crew- or extended-cab styles, but it omits basic features such as air conditioning and a stereo. The step-up Equator Premium (*Est. $21,675) includes all normal basic features in extended cab only.

The Suzuki Equator Sport (*Est. $22,895 to $27,320) comes in either body style; among other things, it adds the spray-on bedliner and Nissan's Utili-Track cargo system that reviews find useful. The crew cab also comes on the Equator RMZ-4 (*Est. $28,550) off-road trim, with an electronic locking differential, high-performance Bilstein shocks, fog lamps and more, although other features (including electronic stability control, hill hold control and hill descent control) are still extra-cost options.

The brand-new Suzuki Equator had no reliability record when we checked. Its parent truck, the Nissan Frontier, gets very high reliability ratings in one major owner survey, but very low marks in J.D. Power and Associates' most recent dependability study.

ConsumerReports.org is usually one of the best sources for pickup truck reviews, but editors had not yet tested the Suzuki Equator when we checked. Experts at Edmunds.com and Autoblog.com provide the best overviews of the Equator and do a good job differentiating it from the Nissan Frontier. The Suzuki Equator review at Motor Trend provides similar information, but it isn't quite as extensive as the others. Petersen's 4 Wheel & Off-Road magazine includes the Equator in a thorough off-road comparison test. MotherProof.com's "mom-reviewer" looks at the Equator from a family point of view. Government and nonprofit agencies are the best source for safety and fuel-economy ratings.

expand
collapse

Our Sources

1. Edmunds.com

Edmunds.com editors say they may like the Suzuki Equator even a bit better than the Nissan Frontier on which it is based -- and the Frontier is one of their favorite pickups. The Equator has all of the Frontier's good points, plus a better warranty and more airbags.

Review: 2009 Suzuki Equator Review, Editors of Edmunds.com

2. Autoblog.com

Reviewer Jeremy Korzeniewski finds that the Suzuki Equator performs well both on- and off-road, and he says the Equator looks better and has a better warranty than the Nissan Frontier on which it is based.

Review: First Drive: 2009 Suzuki Equator, Jeremy Korzeniewski, Sept. 23, 2008

3. Motor Trend

As a new-for-2009 truck, the Suzuki Equator gets an automatic spot in Motor Trend's Truck of the Year contest. It doesn't win, but this first-drive review explains a few of the truck's pros and cons. The Equator shares its parent Nissan Frontier's big turning circle and rough, noisy ride, but the Equator's seven-year, 100,000-mile powertrain warranty is a unique pro.

Review: First Drive: 2009 Suzuki Equator, Allyson Harwood, Oct. 9, 2008

4. Petersen's 4 Wheel & Off Road

Editors here are surprised when the Suzuki Equator beats new trucks from Dodge, Ford and Hummer in extensive off-road testing. The Equator places near the top in rock crawling, hill climbing, asphalt and dirt tests, and its superior performance on sand dunes puts it over the top.

Review: 2009 4x4 of the Year Winner -- 2009 Suzuki Equator, Editors of Petersen's 4 Wheel & Off-Road, Feb. 2009

5. MotherProof.com

Reviewer Sherrice Gilsbach tests the crew-cab Suzuki Equator for a week with her two kids, ages three and six. Gilsbach finds the cabin roomy and comfortable, but she says a tonneau cover and cargo net would make the truck's bed more grocery-friendly.

Review: 2009 Equator Has the Basics Down Pat, Sherrice Gilsbach, Feb. 2009

6. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

The Suzuki Equator is essentially identical to the Nissan Frontier, and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety bases its ratings of the Suzuki on tests of the Nissan. The trucks do a good job protecting occupants in front crashes, but a poor job in rear crashes, tests show. The Nissan gets a "marginal" side-crash rating without its optional side airbags, but IIHS notes that that rating doesn't apply to the Suzuki, which includes side airbags as standard equipment. Electronic stability control is optional on both trucks, IIHS notes.

Review: Small Pickups, Editors of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

7. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

The Suzuki Equator gets the same crash and rollover ratings as the Nissan Frontier in government tests, although the Equator had not yet been side-impact crash tested here when we checked. Neither truck rises to the best-in-class Toyota Tacoma's level of crash-test safety.

Review: 5-Star Safety Ratings, Editors of National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

8. FuelEconomy.gov

The Suzuki Equator gets the same Environmental Protection Agency mileage estimates as its platform twin, the Nissan Frontier. The two pickup trucks aren't class leaders in fuel economy, but they aren't far behind the top-rated Toyota Tacoma.

Review: 2009 Small Pickup Trucks, Editors of FuelEconomy.gov

Pickup Trucks Runners Up:

Back to top