Page: 7 of 7
Running Shoes: Ratings of Sources
Total of 15 Sources
Spring 2009 Running Shoe Guide
by Warren Greene
Our Assessment

Runner's World provides the most useful and credible reviews of the latest running shoes. Thirty new running shoes are poked and prodded in the Shoe Lab and evaluated by hundreds of wear-testers. Shoes aren't ranked, but models are grouped according to type and editors select seven models for special praise. The Asics Gel-Kayano 15 wins the Editor's Choice award for 2009, and the Saucony ProGrid Stabil CS and New Balance 1063 both win Best Update or "most improved." Runner's World picks the Karhu Strong Fulcrum Ride, Karhu Fluid Fulcrum Ride and the Saucony ProGrid Echelon as the Best Debuts of the year. Finally, the Mizuno Wave Nexus 3 wins the Best Buy distinction for 2009. The winter shoe guide in the December 2008 issue also features valuable reviews of several shoes that are reviewed by other sources.

expand

collapse

Do You Get Value for Money when You Buy an Expensive Pair of Running Shoes?
by R. Clinghan, G. Arnold, T. Drew, L. Cochrane, and R. Abboud
Our Assessment

This British study aims to find if more expensive running shoes provide better cushioning and plantar pressure than less expensive shoes from the same (undisclosed) brands. Three pairs of running shoes were bought from three different manufacturers at three different price ranges. Plantar pressure measurements were recorded from under the heel, across the forefoot and under the great toe among 55 participants. Low- and medium-cost running shoes in each of the three brands offered the same, if not superior, cushioning and plantar pressure as high-cost running shoes. No specific brands or shoe models are identified, but the study is still informative. What's not tested is durability, so the question of whether pricey shoes last longer goes unanswered.

expand

collapse

Running Shoes: Road
by Brian Metzler
Our Assessment

Brian Metlzer of National Geographic Adventure Magazine also writes the Running Times shoe guide (noted below), but the National Geographic review is slightly more valuable because there is a pick in each category and the shoes are rated on various criteria. The reviews are short, and there's not much information to tell us who performed the testing or how many people were involved. The Saucony ProGrid Paramount is singled out as the best shoe for high-mileage runners, and the New Balance 1011 is Adventure's pick for overpronators. The Newton Gravity wins the award for most innovative.

expand

collapse

Shape's 2009 Shoe Awards
by Sarah Bowen Shea
Our Assessment

Shape magazine enlists 300 women to test over 40 new running, walking and trail shoes for their annual spring shoe guide. Based on user feedback, Shape picks the best running shoes of the year in various categories. The reviews are useful, especially given the number of women enlisted to test the latest shoes, but the testing criteria are not explained. Shape picks the New Balance 749 for best stability shoe, the Nike Zoom Start+ for best cushioned shoe and the Under Armour Apparition for speed workouts. The Brooks Infiniti 2 is Shape's pick for distance runners.

expand

collapse

Shoe Reviews
by Brian Metzler
Our Assessment Running Times reviews a host of new running shoes, and their reviews are detailed although their methodology is not explained. They don't compare, rank or rate models and no shoes are selected as the best of the year. However, their shoe guide features information on over 30 running-shoe models and is a useful cross-reference for other editorial or consumer reviews.
Women's Adventure 2009 Editor's Choice Awards
by Karina Evertsen
Our Assessment

Editors at Women's Adventure magazine spent six months testing numerous running shoes, ultimately choosing four models as Editor's Choice winners for 2009. Their reviews are based on tester feedback, but they don't compare models or cast a critical eye on any of the shoes. The Asics Gel-Kayano 15 earns an Editor's Choice award. The New Balance 769 ST, Saucony ProGrid Triumph 6 and Brooks Infiniti 2 complete the magazine's picks for 2009.

expand

collapse

7. Wired.com
Mar. 12, 2009
Newton All Weather Trainer/Brooks Trance 8
by Mathew Honan
Our Assessment Triathlete Mathew Honan writes a detailed personal review of the Newton All Weather Trainer for Wired.com. He tests the shoe over two months and 200 miles. He does rate the shoe as excellent, but there are unfortunately no comparisons to other models. Honan also writes a shorter review of the Brooks Trance 8, which was picked for Wired's Wish List for 2008.
Tested: Running Shoes
by Greg Melville
Our Assessment Men's Journal evaluates 14 pairs of running shoes, choosing nine favorites. The magazine enlists the help of 35 runners who put over 3,000 miles on the 14 pairs tested. The reviews are not incredibly detailed, and fewer models are evaluated compared to other editorial reviews.
9. Buzzillions.com
Not Dated
Running Shoe Reviews
by Contributors to Buzzillions.com
Our Assessment

Consumer-review websites used to be pretty unhelpful when evaluating running shoes, but that is starting to change. The selection of running-shoe reviews on Buzzillions.com is extensive and some of the top-rated shoes have hundreds of individual consumer reviews. Buzzillions collects reviews from other, more obscure sites. Surprisingly, even some of the newest models have attracted several dozen reviews, although the best-reviewed shoes on the site are now discontinued.

expand

collapse

10. Blue Ridge Outdoors
Feb. 26, 2009
The Need For Speed: The Fastest Running Shoes of 2009
by Editors of Blue Ridge Outdoors
Our Assessment Blue Ridge Outdoors magazine gives their picks for the fastest running shoes of 2009. While their focus is on trail running, they do include a review of the New Balance 1063 and label it one of the fastest running shoes. Their review is balanced, but it's unfortunate they don't review more models.
11. Maine Today
Dec. 2, 2008
Maine Running: New Running Shoes That Rock in 2009
by John Rogers
Our Assessment John Rogers, owner of the Maine Running Company and a running coach, reviews several new running shoes that he likes for 2009. He singles out the New Balance 1063 as the best upgrade of the year, and while his reviews are not very detailed, they are an interesting supplement to other editorial reviews.
12. RoadRunnerSports.com
Not Dated
Men's Shoes: Running
by Contributors to RoadRunnerSports.com
Our Assessment RoadRunnerSports.com is an online retailer of running shoes and apparel, and they have several useful consumer reviews of the new crop of shoes. The reviews are limited in quantity, but the site provides user feedback on the popular New Balance 1063 and Asics Gel-Kayano 15. There's no way to sort by best rated or most reviewed, so it is impossible to tell which shoes receive the best ratings.
13. ConsumerReports.org
Aug. 2008
Running Shoes: The Fit Matters Most
by Editors of ConsumerReports.org
Our Assessment Consumer Reports is normally one of the best sources for product reviews, but their running-shoe coverage is lacking. They pick one overall shoe as best, which is now discontinued, as well as a budget model for men and women. Their reviews would be more helpful if they had recommended picks in categories such as neutral, stability or motion control.
Gear Review: New Balance 1063
by Joe Nuss
Our Assessment Joe Nuss, the managing editor of Endurance Magazine, writes a lengthy review of the New Balance 1063. While he doesn't review other models or make any picks, the review is detailed and confirms what other reviewers are saying about the 1063.
15. RunTex.com
Jan. 20, 2009
RunTex Equipment Reviews
by Tom Ruthven
Our Assessment RunTex.com singles out the Asics GT-2140 as one of the best updates of 2009. While the shoe is not compared to other models, the review is extensive and the road-test section is especially helpful. There are only a limited number of shoe reviews on the RunTex.com site and the GT-2140 review is the only recent one posted.

Back to top