
The Canon CanoScan 9000F is a well-reviewed multipurpose scanner with a maximum resolution of 9600 dpi. PCMag.com's M. David Stone says, "It does an extremely good job with photographic prints but is less impressive for film (slides and negatives.)" Like other flatbed models in this price range, the 9000F uses an LED light source that virtually eliminates warm-up times. Reviewers and users say they like the ability of the 9000F to scan multiple images at once and save them as individual files. About.com guide Peter Piazza reports of the optical character recognition (OCR) function that "at the default 300 dpi OCR results were pretty weakÉ. at 400 dpi noticeably better." For scanning photos, several reviewers recommend purchasing third-party software rather than using Canon's ScanGear, which comes with the scanner. If you want to scan large batches of slides and film negatives, experts recommend the Plustek OpticFilm 7600i SE (*Est. $330) , a dedicated film scanner.
We found in-depth professional reviews of the Canon CanoScan 9000F on ImagingResource.com, PCMag.com, Shutterbug.com, ComputerActive.com and ScanDig, including results of hands-on testing. Many consumers post ratings and reviews on Amazon.com and B&H Photo's website; they give a perspective on the performance of the Canon CanoScan 9000F over time.

| Canon CanoScan 9000F Color Image Scanner | |
(241 reviews) In Stock. Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping |
|
Our Sources
Mike Pasini gives a detailed review of the Canon CanoScan 9000F scanner including comparisons to its closest competitors, the Canon CanoScan 8800F and the Epson V600. Pasini likes all three units but says the 9000F has a slight edge, with higher resolution than both competitors. He does note, however, that the included software limits its ability to produce the highest quality color images from slides, and he recommends using a third-party scanning utility like SilverFast or VueScan.
Review: CanoScan 9000F -- Scanning at 9600 dpi, Mike Pasini, May 2010
Reviewer M. David Stone gives the Canon CanoScan 9000F a 3.5 out of 5 rating, writing that it is primarily sold as a photo scanner and that "it does an extremely good job with photographic prints but is less impressive for film (slides and negatives)." His insightful review compares the 9000F to its predecessor, Canon's 8800F, and to two close competitors from Epson, the V500 and V600.
Review: Canon CanoScan 9000F Film and Negative Scanner, M. David Stone, Aug. 17, 2010
3. ScanDig
The editors at ScanDig give a thorough account of hands-on testing of the CanoScan 9000F, including details about how to best use various features. This review, originally published in German, concludes that the 9000F "will not replace a good film scanner. It is rather a good all-round-device that offersÉgood image quality in this price and quality range."
Review: Test report of the Canon Scanner CanoScan 9000F, Editors of ScanDig
Photo expert David B. Brooks offers a detailed review of the Canon CanoScan 9000F based on his use of it with LaserSoft's SilverFast software, version Ai 6, as opposed to the included software, Canon's ScanGear. He concludes, "the bottom line is that the CanoScan 9000F with SilverFast is a really good scanner, especially considering it does prints, medium format, and 35mm."
Review: New Canon CanoScan 9000F & SilverFast; An Ideal Flat-Bed Scanner & Software For Photo Enthusiasts, David B. Brooks, Feb. 1, 2011
5. About.com
About.com guide Peter Piazza gives a short summary of his hands-on testing of the Canon CanoScan 9000F. He gives it a rating of 3.5 out of five, saying that overall image quality is very good. One criticism he has is that "optical character recognition was spotty at lower resolutions, but seemed to improve at higher resolution; however, the end product of OCR scans comes out in Notepad, which isn't the most useful program." (Note: ConsumerSearch is owned by About.com, but the two don't share an editorial affiliation.)
Review: Review of the Canon CanoScan 9000F Flatbed Scanner, Peter Piazza, May 2010
ComputerActive.com awards the Canon CanoScan 9000F a "Buy It" designation. Reviewer Anthony Dhanendran says scan quality is "superb," and he likes that it can scan in film negatives and slides in batches. The short review gives results of hands-on testing.
Review: Canon CanoScan 9000F, Anthony Dhanendran, Aug. 20, 2010
7. Amazon.com
More than 230 owners post reviews of the Canon CanoScan 9000F on Amazon.com, giving it an average overall rating of 4.4 out of 5. Nearly all agree that scan quality is very good to excellent. Several note problems with the included scanning software, and some are dissatisfied with the scan quality from slides. Most, however, have nothing but praise for the CanoScan 9000F.
Review: Canon CanoScan 9000F Color Image Scanner, Contributors to Amazon.com
8. B&H Photo
Over 250 users contribute ratings and reviews of the CanoScan 9000F on this retail site. The overall rating is quite high -- 4.6 out of 5. We saw a couple of complaints about the included software, but other than those the comments are positive.
Review: Canon CanoScan 9000F Color Image Scanner, Contributors to B&H Photo
Scanners Runners Up:
6 picks including: Amazon.com, PC World…
4 picks including: About.com, Amazon.com…
3 picks including: Amazon.com, IT Reviews.com…
3 picks including: Amazon.com, B&H Photo…
3 picks including: Amazon.com, Laptop Magazine…
2 picks including: Amazon.com…
2 picks including: Amazon.com, Engadget.com…
|
Sponsored Links are keyword-targeted advertisements provided through the Google AdWords™ program. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by Google. For information about these Google ads, go to adwords.google.com. Google may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your Web browser. Information from this cookie may be used by Google to help provide advertisers with more targeted advertising opportunities. For more information about Google's privacy policy, including how to opt out, go to www.google.com/ads/preferences. By clicking on Sponsored Links you will leave ConsumerSearch.com. The web site you will go to is not endorsed by ConsumerSearch. |