
Sluggish acceleration and a general lack of refinement keep the 2010 Cadillac SRX from posing much of a threat to the class-leading 2010 Audi Q5 (Base MSRP: $37,350) and other top entries in the small premium SUV class, according to reviews.
The SRX is redesigned for 2010, abandoning its old tall-wagon, rear-wheel-drive platform for a front-wheel or all-wheel drive configuration. Critics mostly like the SRX crossover's bold new look, with its aggressive V-shaped grille and tailfin-shaped taillights. A comfortable five-passenger cabin and loads of techno-goodies sweeten the deal.
Unfortunately, the SRX "uses splashy surface techniques to mask genetic deficiencies: a peashooter of a V-6; a lazy and intrusive transmission; an occasionally choppy ride," writes Lawrence Ulrich at The New York Times. The SRX does draw a few admirers -- mostly for its nimble handling -- but most experts agree with Ulrich that the slow, heavy, pricey SRX misses the mark in its attempt to compete with the athletes of the small premium SUV segment.
Even its admirers say the SRX's base engine, a 265-horsepower, 3-liter V6, has a hard time hauling around its two-ton-plus bulk. You can opt for a stronger, turbocharged, 300-horsepower, 2.8-liter V6, but prepare to pay more than $41,000 and take a penalty in fuel economy . Plus, Motor Trend testers find the turbo version suffers from "lumpy" power delivery and a ride as jittery "as if it's running on Peet's French Roast."
Fuel economy starts about average for the class, at 18 mpg city/25 mpg highway/21 mpg combined for the base engine, six-speed automatic and front-wheel drive. But testers at CNET, The New York Times and elsewhere get only 19 mpg or less -- and that's with a transmission that Ulrich says is "obsessed with moving you into high gears too soon" to squeeze out the maximum fuel economy, although Autoblog.com's Chris Shunk notes that a manual-shift mode is available. Add the turbo engine and AWD, and Environmental Protection Agency fuel-economy estimates drop to 15 city/22 highway/18 combined, but Motor Trend manages just 14 mpg in its turbo test.
Cargo space is also about average for a small crossover, at 30 cubic feet (61 cubic feet with the rear seats folded). The SRX is simply not meant for towing; Cadillac lists its maximum trailering capacity at zero.
AWD is available on all but the base, front-wheel-drive-only Cadillac SRX model. The entry-level 3 liter engine comes standard on the base SRX (Base MSRP: $33,830) and Luxury Collection (Base MSRP: $37,410 to $39,905). The base model includes class-consistent satellite radio and dual automatic climate control, but only "leatherette" upholstery. Heated leather seats come with the Luxury Collection, along with a panoramic glass roof and a slew of other high-end features from remote engine start to an adjustable-height power liftgate. The optional pop-up navigation system impresses critics, and it comes with a backup camera; backseat entertainment is optional.
The turbocharged 2.8 liter engine and sport suspension are optional on the Performance Collection (Base MSRP: $41,850 to $49,315) -- which includes the aforementioned nav and backup camera, and then dresses up the exterior with 20-inch alloy wheels, fog lamps and more. The Premium Collection (Base MSRP: $44,395 to $51,860) tops things out with keyless ignition, three-zone climate control, ventilated front seats and other high-end features.
Crash ratings are good, although the Cadillac SRX's 4-star rating for protecting passengers in a frontal crash don't match the 5-star rating earned by the 2010 Audi Q5 and others. The SRX includes antilock brakes, electronic stability control and front, front-side and curtain airbags, as well as General Motors' OnStar emergency communications system.
We found no reliability ratings for this new model. The 2010 Cadillac SRX is covered by a four-year/50,000-mile basic warranty, with a five-year/100,000 mile powertrain warranty.
Critics tend to compare the 2010 Cadillac SRX with the top-selling 2010 Lexus RX350 midsize luxury crossover, including those at The New York Times, Motor Trend, Popular Mechanics, TheTruthAboutCars.com and Autoblog.com. ConsumerReports.org and a second test at Motor Trend widen their scope, ranking the Cadillac SRX directly against a variety of competing SUVs. Edmunds.com's thorough review covers most aspects of the redesigned Cadillac, while CNET focuses narrowly on its cabin and drivetrain tech. Crash ratings are posted at SaferCar.gov and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's website, with fuel-economy estimates at FuelEconomy.gov.
Our Sources
1. Edmunds.com
The redesigned Cadillac SRX is "competent," but too heavy and slow to really compete with other small, premium SUVs, Edmunds.com testers conclude. The SRX's comfort and style are critiqued, as well.
Review: 2010 Cadillac SRX Review, Editors of Edmunds.com
2. ConsumerReports.orgDetails/Subscribe
ConsumerReports.org tests the 2010 Cadillac SRX and ranks its performance and comfort against most other SUVs on the market. However, this redesigned model has no reliability or owner-satisfaction history -- two major factors in ConsumerReports.org's ratings.
Review: Cadillac SRX, Editors of ConsumerReports.org
A flashy body and showy cabin can't mask the Cadillac SRX's inherent problems, Lawrence Ulrich says: it's too slow, too unrefined and too fuel-thirsty to compete with either the popular Lexus RX or the more athletic SUVs on the market.
Review: A Redesign Aims Lower and Yet Comes Up Short, Lawrence Ulrich, July 24, 2009
4. Motor TrendDetails/Subscribe
The newly redesigned Cadillac SRX joins the race for Motor Trend's Sport Utility of the Year award, but it comes up short. Even with an optional turbo engine, testers find acceleration "anemic" compared with rivals, and they say the ride is jittery.
Review: 2010 Motor Trend Sport/Utility of the Year: The Contenders: Cadillac SRX, Edward Loh, October 2009
5. Motor TrendDetails/Subscribe
When compared only with the 2010 Lexus RX 350, the Cadillac SRX wins. This time, the nonturbo SRX is tested. It's still not as fast or refined as the Lexus, but the SRX "is more fun and rewarding to drive."
Review: Comparison: 2010 Cadillac SRX vs. 2010 Lexus RX 350, Todd Lassa, June 2009
6. PopularMechanics.comDetails/Subscribe
In this comparo, the Lexus RX 350 beats the 2010 Cadillac SRX by a hair. Popular Mechanics agrees with Motor Trend that the Cadillac is more fun to drive, but the more comfortable, refined Lexus is a better everyday driver.
Review: Cadillac SRX vs. Lexus RX350 Comparison Test: Can GM's Best Topple Lexus?, Larry Webster, July 1, 2009
A "gutless engine," cut-rate leather and other skimps -- plus nearly 20 cubic feet less cargo space -- mean the Cadillac SRX won't emerge from the Lexus RX's shadow with this redesign, tester Sajeev Mehta concludes.
Review: Review: 2010 Cadillac SRX V6, Sajeev Mehta, Nov. 18, 2009
8. Autoblog.com
Chris Shunk likes the Cadillac SRX, saying its lovely cabin, bold styling and fun-to-drive demeanor may finally give it "the goods to go toe-to-toe against Lexus' all-powerful RX," but it could use more power.
Review: Review: 2010 Cadillac SRX Charts a New Course for Thick Part of the Market, Chris Shunk, July 8, 2009
9. Autoblog.com
More power arrives with the turbocharged Cadillac SRX. Chris Shunk finds it handles GM's high-performance test track without embarrassing itself, and it's comfortable on regular roads.
Review: First Drive: 2010 Cadillac SRX 2.8T Adds More Power and Agility to the Crossover Party, Chris Shunk, Aug. 7, 2009
10. CNET
CNET, a tech review site, tests vehicles and rates them based on how technologically advanced they are. The Cadillac SRX earns a rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars -- higher than most other small SUVs. Wayne Cunningham finds some flaws, but he praises the SRX's navigation system and other cabin tech.
Review: 2010 Cadillac SRX, Wayne Cunningham, Dec. 17, 2009
11. SaferCar.gov
The 2010 Cadillac SRX earns 4 stars for passenger protection in a frontal crash, while some of its competitors earn perfect 5-star ratings. Otherwise, the SRX is on par with the best in its class, with 5-star side-crash and frontal-driver protection ratings and 4 stars for rollover resistance.
Review: 5-Star Safety Ratings, Editors of SaferCar.gov
12. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
Like most others in its class, the Cadillac SRX earns the highest rating of Good in front-, side- and rear-crash tests here, but its rollover roof strength has not yet been tested.
Review: Midsize Luxury SUVs, Editors of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
13. FuelEconomy.gov
This federal website ranks most 2010 SUVs according to their estimated fuel economy. Visitors can also search for individual estimates for every version of the 2010 Cadillac SRX here.
Review: 2010 Sport Utility Vehicles, Editors of FuelEconomy.gov
Small SUVs Runners Up:
10 picks by top review sites.
7 picks by top review sites.
6 picks by top review sites.
5 picks by top review sites.
5 picks by top review sites.
1 pick including: FuelEconomy.gov, InsideLine.com…
|
Sponsored Links are keyword-targeted advertisements provided through the Google AdWords™ program. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by Google. For information about these Google ads, go to adwords.google.com. Google may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your Web browser. Information from this cookie may be used by Google to help provide advertisers with more targeted advertising opportunities. For more information about Google's privacy policy, including how to opt out, go to www.google.com/ads/preferences. By clicking on Sponsored Links you will leave ConsumerSearch.com. The web site you will go to is not endorsed by ConsumerSearch. |