
Reviewers are impressed with the tight handling, comfortable interior and contemporary styling of the 2011 Buick Regal sport sedan, but many say the base 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine is simply too weak. Cars.com's David Thomas calls the Regal "a good-looking, excellent-handling midsize sedan that packs a lot of content for its price, with just a few drawbacks." First problem is the slow acceleration with the base engine. However, the 2-liter turbocharged four-cylinder in the Regal CXL Turbo adds performance thatÔs more satisfying to most critics.
Auto writers say the Regal has a distinctly European feel, unsurprisingly, because it's based on the Opel Insignia midsize sport sedan (Opel is General Motors' European brand), and both cars (are built on the same assembly line in RŸsselsheim, Germany. (Regal production will eventually be moved to North America.) Many reviewers, like Edmunds.com's John DiPietro, explain that the European-influenced Buick "should go a long way toward erasing old stereotypes and writing a new chapter for this hard-working car company."
The Buick Regal comes in two models, each with its own direct-injected four-cylinder engine. The Regal CXL (Base MSRP: $26,245) is powered by a 182-horsepower 2.4-liter engine, matched to a six-speed automatic with a manual-shift feature. The Regal CXL Turbo (Base MSRP: $28,745) bumps the horsepower rating up to 220 with its 2-liter four-cylinder. The standard transmission for the Turbo is also a six-speed automatic with a manual tap-shift, but it can also be ordered with a traditional six-speed manual gearbox. Both Buick Regal sedans are well equipped with 18-inch alloy wheels, dual-zone automatic climate control, heated front seats, leather upholstery, OnStar, Bluetooth and a seven-speaker stereo with USB port, CD and satellite radio. In addition to the turbocharged engine, the CXL Turbo adds variable-speed steering, rear parking sensors, power passenger seat and a 120-volt AC power outlet.
With a six-speed automatic, the base engine delivers an Environmental Protection Agency-estimated 19 mpg city/30 mpg highway/23 mpg combined, while the 2-liter turbo with the automatic drops to 18 city/28 highway/22 combined. The most fuel efficient Buick Regal is the CXL Turbo with the available six-speed manual: 20 mpg city/32 mpg highway/24 mpg combined. The Regal Turbo is also E85 Ethanol-compatible. On the biofuel, fuel economy drops substantially: 13 city/21 highway/16 combined with the automatic and 15 city/22 highway/17 combined with the six-speed stick.
Many reviewers laud the Regal as being one of the best Buicks in years. After driving the Regal CXL Turbo, The Wall Street Journal's Dan Neil "came away deeply impressed, if not quite panting with desire." He calls the interior "excellent," with seats that are "comfortable, supportive and well contoured." The sound insulation is good, he says, and the exterior styling is "competent and substantial, with the kind of sporty visual amplitude you'd expect of an Autobahn-bred car." He adds, "And, best of all, the car handles like a European sport sedan. Think, not BMW, but perhaps Peugeot or Renault."
None of the reviews go as far as to recommend the Regal over the highly rated 2011 BMW 328i sedan (Base MSRP: $33,650), but some say it's a good alternative to the higher priced 2011 Acura TSX (Base MSRP: $29,610 to $35,150). Reviewers also say that a well-equipped Regal holds its own against other more expensive near-luxury sedans such as the 2011 Lexus ES 350 (Base MSRP: $36,025) and front-wheel-drive 2011 Audi A4 (Base MSRP $31,950 to $32,850). After driving the CXL Turbo on the NŸrburgring track in Germany, Motor Trend editor-in-chief Angus MacKenzie calls the 2-liter "easily the best four-cylinder motor yet from GM." He adds, "You can't help but think a V-6 in this car would simply be a waste of money and gas, and the extra mass over the front axle would probably ruin the chassis balance."
In addition to well-planted handling, the new Buick sedan's ride is comfortable and quiet. "The terrific handling doesn't compromise ride quality," says Cars.com's David Thomas. "On various surfaces, the Regal exhibited little road noise, with none of the floaty ride I found in the redesigned [Buick] LaCrosse."
However, in a three-car comparison test conducted by Car and Driver, the Regal CXL Turbo finishes in last place behind the 2011 Acura TSX and the 2011 Volkswagen CC (Base MSRP: $28,200 to $39,990). The CC has the least power of the group, but was much faster than the Regal and only 0.4 seconds behind the V6-powered TSX to 60 mph. On the track, the turbo Regal required 7.5 seconds in the 0 to 60 dash, while the 200-horsepower turbo CC reached the same speed in 6.4 seconds. Car and Driver editor John Phillips says the Regal fails to establish "a visceral relationship with its driver" like some other sporty cars do. He also objects to the "grittiness" in the engine, adding, "At any speed, this engine announces way too proudly that it's a four-banger."
The naturally aspirated Regal CXL is expectedly slower than the turbo model. Edmunds Inside Line clocks it at 9.8 seconds to 60 mph. Senior editor Erin Riches says, "Well, surprisingly and sadly, you can go wrong with the base engine, as this 2011 Buick Regal CXL is the slowest 182-hp car we've ever tested." She says the six-speed automatic transmission is not to blame with its "smooth, crisp upshifts at 6,500 rpm." Rather she claims, "Curb weight is a likely source of the slow, as the Regal weighs in at 3,665 pounds."
Most reviews are impressed with the Buick's perceived quality, especially in the cabin. Edmunds.com's John DiPietro says, "Those with a discerning eye toward cabin materials and overall fit and finish should be pleased, as our test car displayed solid build quality all around."
The layout of some of the controls gets some criticism, however. Autoblog.com's Jeff Sabatini explains, "While the layout of the Regal's dashboard 'button field' is nicely symmetric, there's neither rhyme nor reason to the layout." The optional navigation system is not a touch screen. A perplexed Sabatini says, "At times, the system requires the driver to press a numbered button to make a selection on the screen, despite the presence of both a second rotary controller and a four-axis joystick on the center stack."
The trunk holds 14.2 cubic feet of cargo, and the split rear seats fold down for additional utility. The backseat is "surprisingly spacious in legroom," David Thomas says. "It has 3 more inches of it than the TSX, and it's noticeable." However, headroom is a bit tighter than the Acura, he adds.
The Regal comes with six airbags including front and rear side-curtain airbags. Additional rear seat-mounted, side-impact airbags are optional. Antilock brakes and electronic stability control are standard as well. The independent Insurance Institute for Highway Safety names the 2011 Buick Regal a Top Safety Pick, meaning it scored the highest rating of Good in both front and side crash tests, as well as the organization's roof-crush test. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has not yet crash-tested the 2011 Buick Regal sedan.
A hotter, range-topping Buick Regal GS with a 255-horsepower version of the 2-liter turbo engine is set to debut this later in 2011 as a 2012 model. It'll be joined by the 2012 Buick Regal eAssist, which adds a 15-horsepower electric motor to the 2.4-liter base powertrain. The electric motor provides assistance during acceleration, and the eAssist system also adds regenerative braking and start/stop tech. These measures are expected to boost the Regal eAssist's fuel economy ratings to 26 mpg city/37 mpg highway. If the eAssist system's parts and benefits sound familiar, it's because General Motors used to market its earlier iteration as a Hybrid on sedans like the Chevy Malibu and the now-defunct Saturn Aura.
Car and Driver conducts a thorough three-car comparison test with the Regal against the Acura TSX and Volkswagen CC. Among the most comprehensive single-car reviews are those from Cars.com, Edmunds Inside Line, Autoblog.com and The New York Times. Additional useful information and opinions can be found at USA Today, Automobile Magazine and CNET, which places additional emphasis on the vehicle's in-cabin technology.
Our Sources
1. Car and DriverDetails/Subscribe
The Buick Regal CXL Turbo finishes last place in this three-car comparison, behind the Acura TSX and first-place Volkswagen CC. John Phillips says the Regal is too heavy and slow, but "all the right parts are present and accounted for. They merely require more massaging."
Review: 2010 Acura TSX V6 vs. 2011 Buick Regal CXL Turbo, 2010 Volkswagen CC 2.0T R-Line -- Comparison Tests, John Phillips, Oct. 2010
2. Cars.com
David Thomas provides plenty of information and driving opinions of the base Buick Regal CXL. He says it "looks like a more expensive car" than its price suggests. He says most drivers won't notice the "sedate" engine's lack of power "during typical around-town driving or during your commute, but once you hit even a moderate hill, the engine groans with disapproval."
Review: 2011 Buick Regal, David Thomas, June 1, 2010
Edmunds Inside Line's thorough review includes track testing figures and good driving impressions, along with a two-minute summary video. Senior editor Eric Riches is not impressed with the Buick Regal, calling it "merely a competent midsize car with clean styling and modern features."
Review: 2011 Buick Regal CXL 2.4-Liter Full Test and Video, Erin Riches, Dec. 22, 2010
4. Autoblog.com
Autoblog.com covers the Buick Regal with a good discussion of its advantages and drawbacks. Writer Jeff Sabatini is pleased with its overall comfort and fine handling, but emphasizes "there are lots of details that seem like they didn't get worked out prior to the Regal's launch."
Review: Review: 2011 Buick Regal CXL, Jeff Sabatini, Nov. 11, 2010
With good background information and insightful driving impressions, Lawrence Ulrich thoroughly describes the Regal and its place in the U.S. market. He claims, "This might be the best-looking sedan from any American automaker." But after driving the base engine, he suggests the extra cost for the turbo model is "the best $2,500 a Buick buyer will ever spend."
Review: Exchange Student on the Honor Roll, Lawrence Ulrich, Oct. 15, 2010
6. Edmunds.com
In this Edmunds.com summary review, John DiPietro suggests, "Consumers considering a sporty, uptown sedan would do well to put the 2011 Buick Regal on their short list." He recommends the turbo for "those looking for a more spirited drive."
Review: 2011 Buick Regal Road Test, John DiPietro
USA Today's auto writer James Healey is underwhelmed by his test drives in two of the base Buick Regal CXL models. Then he spends a short time in a CXL Turbo model, and proclaims it "as good as the non-turbo was bad."
Review: Review: 2011 Buick Regal is Potentially Great, Just Not Yet, James R. Healey, Sept. 17, 2010
8. Automobile MagazineDetails/Subscribe
Automobile Magazine's Joe DeMatio drives the Buick Regal CXL Turbo in Germany, including some track time at the famed NŸrburgring. He comments, "Not for one moment did we wish for six cylinders under the hood." In the cabin, he notes, "The Regal's interior is quite nicely designed and finished but still falls slightly short of Volkswagen standards."
Review: Driven: 2011 Buick Regal CXL, Joe DeMatio, July 2010
This review gives a good balance of the Buick Regal CXL Turbo's plusses and minuses. Writer Edward Niedermeyer is impressed with the turbocharged engine, responsive chassis, quiet cabin and high-quality interior materials. He quibbles with the steering feel and driver seat's insufficient side bolstering.
Review: Review: 2011 Buick Regal Turbo, Edward Niedermeyer, May 26, 2010
10. CNET
CNET gives extra attention to a vehicle's electronic technology, and finds the Buick Regal's equipment "quite complete." Writer Antuan Goodwin also provides a good road-test review, in which he calls the Regal "a handsome sedan with good handling but only middling power."
Review: 2011 Buick Regal CXL, Antuan Goodwin, Oct. 15, 2010
11. Motor TrendDetails/Subscribe
Editor-in-chief Angus MacKenzie calls the Buick Regal "suave and sophisticated" in this thorough test-drive report. He says, "The Buick is utterly unfazed by mid-corner lumps and bumps, resolutely holding its line through the turns, yet it's impressively agile on the change of direction."
Review: First Drive: 2011 Buick Regal (U.S. Spec), Angus MacKenzie, April 27, 2010
Auto critic Dan Neil is pleased with the Buick Regal's styling, refinement, noise level, comfort, ride and handling. Overall he says, "Well, it's kind of terrific." Complaints include the light steering feel and odd engine sounds.
Review: Confession: The Regal's a Pretty Great Car, Dan Neil, May 29, 2010
ConsumerGuide.com's standardized review covers the Buick Regal CXL and CXL Turbo. The 2.4-liter engine averages 22.7 mpg during test driving. Editors comment, "Choosing the optional turbo engine tacks on a significant price premium, but brings welcome 'go' in place of the base engine's middling acceleration."
Review: 2011 Buick Regal: Road Test, Editors of ConsumerGuide.com
14. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) gives the 2011 Buick Regal its top rating of "Good" in various crash tests, and it earns the Institute's Top Safety Pick honor.
Review: Buick Regal, Editors of Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
15. Autoblog.com
Autoblog.com covers the official announcement of the 2012 Buick Regal eAssist, with a summary of the features, photo gallery and a copy of the official press release.
Review: Officially Official: 2012 Buick Regal eAssist Will Get 26/37 MPG, Steven J. Ewing, Feb. 8, 2011
16. Car and DriverDetails/Subscribe
Car and Driver gives a bullet-point rundown/analysis on what to expect in the 2012 Buick Regal GS performance sedan. Photos of the car are included in an accompanying gallery.
Review: 2012 Buick Regal GS -- Feature, Editors of Car and Driver, April 2010
Sports Sedans Runners Up:
6 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
6 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
6 picks by top review sites.
5 picks by top review sites.
5 picks by top review sites.
5 picks by top review sites.
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety…
3 picks including: Car and Driver, Cars.com…
3 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
|
Sponsored Links are keyword-targeted advertisements provided through the Google AdWords™ program. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by Google. For information about these Google ads, go to adwords.google.com. Google may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your Web browser. Information from this cookie may be used by Google to help provide advertisers with more targeted advertising opportunities. For more information about Google's privacy policy, including how to opt out, go to www.google.com/ads/preferences. By clicking on Sponsored Links you will leave ConsumerSearch.com. The web site you will go to is not endorsed by ConsumerSearch. |