
- Fun to drive
- Powerful, turbocharged base engine
- Available all-wheel drive
- Stylish exterior
- Upscale interior
- Expensive for a small wagon
- Spotty reliability
- Tight backseat, cargo space
- Premium fuel required
March 2009. Experts love to drive the compact, stylish Audi A3, but its high costs and disappointing reliability keep them from recommending it as highly as some other mid-priced wagons.
The Audi A3 is one of the safest wagons on the market, based on crash-test results at the nonprofit Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. It's also one of the most nimble, critics say, with superb handling, a punchy base engine and a body that's 4 inches shorter than the compact Pontiac Vibe (*est. $16,735 to $21,510).
That smaller body means less interior room, though. The Audi A3 offers only about 20 cubic feet of cargo space behind the back seat. That's about the same as the Vibe, but about 40 percent less than the full-size 2009 Subaru Outback (*est. $22,295 to $32,095). You can fold the Audi A3's back seat to open up its maximum 56 cubic feet of cargo space, which is better than the Vibe, but still not as roomy as a full-size wagon.
Unlike the Vibe, testers say the five-passenger Audi A3 wagon's rear seat is a little tight for two adults. One testing organization found that the rigid seatbelt stalks can make it difficult to install car seats. The main recurring complaint about the A3 wagon, however, is its price, which quickly rises to "uncomfortable levels" as you add options, Edmunds.com says.
The price does somewhat reflect the Audi A3's higher standard of luxury, which puts it on the same plane as the stylish Volvo V50 wagon (*est. $29,800 to $35,500), which is the Swedish automaker's foray into the mid-priced market. The V50 wagon has a much bigger cargo bay -- nearly as big as a full-size wagon's -- but reviewers find it more boring to drive than the A3.
Testers say the base Audi A3 2.0T (*est. $26,920) -- named for its 200-horsepower, 2.0-liter inline four-cylinder engine -- provides plenty of power. You can choose either a six-speed manual or automatic transmission; both get an EPA-estimated 24 mpg in combined driving (21 mpg city and 30 mpg highway for the manual, 22 mpg city and 28 mpg highway for the automatic). If you want to add all-wheel drive, it's $3,580 extra.
All-wheel drive comes standard on the upper-level Audi A3 3.2 quattro (*est. $36,975), with its 250-horsepower, 3.2-liter V-6 and six-speed automatic transmission. However, Car and Driver says the bigger engine is "overkill," and it gets lower gas mileage than the base engine (18 city, 25 highway, 21 combined). Audi recommends premium gas for all A3 models, which drives up the cost of ownership even further, reviews note.
Audi brought the A3 to the U.S. market in 2006, and it was received enthusiastically by reviewers. But with a few years of ownership under their belts, buyers are now reporting reliability problems with the A3 wagons; in one leading consumer survey, only the all-wheel-drive Volvo XC70 (*est. $37,250 to $39,500) was judged less reliable among wagons. The Audi A3 is backed by a four-year, 50,000-mile warranty.
ConsumerReports.org uses test and survey data to judge the Audi A3's reliability, fuel economy, performance and more, making it the best overall review source. Edmunds.com also tests the Audi A3, but not quite as extensively as ConsumerReports.org. The nonprofit Insurance Institute for Highway Safety conducts definitive crash tests of the A3, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency posts official fuel-economy estimates. ConsumerGuide.com and Car and Driver both test the Audi A3 and rate it numerically, with brief explanations. Warren Brown at The Washington Post doesn't rate the Audi wagon, but he does test it and give his opinion about its value.
Our Sources
1. ConsumerReports.orgDetails/Subscribe
ConsumerReports.org tests most new cars, including the 2009 Audi A3 station wagon. Not content to believe what manufacturers say, editors actually measure the cars (for cargo and passenger space, etc.) and test the gas mileage. Editors include a predicted reliability score for the A3, based on reader surveys.
Review: Audi A3, Editors of ConsumerReports.org
2. Edmunds.com
Experts here road-test the Audi A3 and concisely judge each aspect of the car. Like other reviewers, they find it fun to drive, but they note that the Audi A3 wagon is a little pricey and its backseat is a little cramped.
Review: 2009 Audi A3 Review, Editors of Edmunds.com
3. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is a nonprofit organization that crash-tests cars. The Audi A3 is one of its Top Safety Picks for 2009, with good performance in front, side and rear crashes.
Review: Top Safety Picks 2009, Editors of Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
Station Wagons Runners Up:
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Canadian Driver…
5 picks including: About.com, FuelEconomy.gov…
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, AskMen.com…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Canadian Driver…
2 picks including: AskMen.com, Car and Driver…
2 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
2 picks including: Business Week, FuelEconomy.gov…

