
- Lowest annual fuel cost of any wagon
- Roomy for a small wagon
- It's reliable
- High resale value
- Available all-wheel drive
- Costs a bit more than Pontiac Vibe, its twin
- Shorter powertrain warranty than Vibe
- New body style less popular than Vibe's
- Sluggish, noisy base engine
- Unimpressive fit and finish
- Tiny windows make it hard to see
- Front seats not the most comfortable
March 2009. Not long ago, the reliable, practical Toyota Matrix was the critics' budget wagon of choice. But now some competitors are offering the same performance for less money -- or better performance for the same money -- and suddenly, the Matrix is no longer the favorite small wagon.
That title now passes to the Matrix's twin, the 2009 Pontiac Vibe (*est. $16,735 to $21,510). The two share almost everything except exterior styling, which critics say is much sportier on the Vibe. Reviews criticize the 2009 Toyota Matrix's new look as bloated, awkward -- or worse. The Matrix's "gun-slit windows … put the words ‘oh s---!' into 'blind spot,'" writes Edward Niedermeyer at The Truth About Cars.
The 2009 Pontiac Vibe is slightly cheaper than the Toyota Matrix, with a longer powertrain warranty: The Vibe is covered for five years/100,000 miles, versus five years/60,000 miles for the Matrix (both have a three-year/36,000-mile basic warranty). Otherwise, reviewers say the two wagons share the same drawbacks: an interior swathed in cheap plastics, and front seats that aren't particularly comfortable. These small wagons include a smaller cargo area than full-size station wagons, along with a smaller backseat. Testers say the rear accommodations are adequate for two adults, but a little tight for three.
On the positive side, experts say the five-passenger Toyota Matrix/Pontiac Vibe wagon is reliable and holds its value well. Its annual fuel cost is the lowest of any wagon; the new clean-diesel version of the Volkswagen Jetta SportWagen (*est. $19,075 to $23,870) gets more miles per gallon, but it uses expensive diesel fuel. All-wheel drive is an option on both the Toyota Matrix and Pontiac Vibe.
The Toyota Matrix range starts with a base version (*est. $16,290). Its 132-horsepower, 1.8-liter four-cylinder engine delivers the best gas mileage -- 28 mpg combined, or 26 mpg city/32 mpg highway with the five-speed manual transmission (25 mpg city/31 mpg highway with the four-speed automatic). Testers say it provides adequate power, but the step-up Toyota Matrix S (*est. $18,360) offers more oomph for passing and accelerating with its 158-horsepower, 2.4-liter four-cylinder.
The 2009 Toyota Matrix XRS (*est. $20,760) adds a double-wishbone rear suspension, choice of five-speed manual or automatic transmission, bigger wheels and a few extra standard features, such as cruise control and a leather-wrapped steering wheel. Fuel economy suffers substantially with the bigger engine. The Matrix S/XRS models get 24 mpg overall: 21 mpg city/28 mpg highway with the manual transmission (29 mpg highway with the automatic). The Toyota Matrix S with all-wheel drive -- available only with the bigger engine and the four-speed automatic -- achieves just 22 mpg overall (20 mpg city/26 mpg highway) according to the EPA.
ConsumerReports.org conducts the most comprehensive analysis of the Toyota Matrix, collecting data on nearly every aspect of the wagon and ranking it against its competitors. The Truth About Cars also takes a thorough look at the Matrix in two separate reviews, and write-ups here are always entertaining. A "mom-tester" at MotherProof.com describes how practical the Matrix is when you're hauling kids. Less extensive reviews at MotorWeek, Car and Driver and Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine are also based on testing. We found gas mileage and pollution ratings at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's website, as well as the nonprofit GreenerCars.org site. Safety ratings at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety aren't as helpful as they usually are, due to incomplete information about the Matrix, but the 2009 Toyota Matrix has been crash-tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Our Sources
1. ConsumerReports.orgDetails/Subscribe
ConsumerReports.org tests the 2009 Toyota Matrix and rates it against 19 other wagons and hatchbacks -- including its near twin, the Pontiac Vibe. The in-depth Matrix report includes detailed road test results, as well as predictions of the Matrix's reliability and resale value, but it's only accessible to subscribers.
Review: 2009 Toyota Matrix Review, Editors of ConsumerReports.org
Justin Berkowitz tests the 2009 Toyota Matrix and judges its appearance, interior and performance. He calls the Matrix a "terrible car" -- not because it's inherently terrible, but because it inexplicably costs more than several similar cars, including the Pontiac Vibe and Scion xB.
Review: 2009 Toyota Matrix Review, Justin Berkowitz, Feb. 29, 2008
This review compares the styling, interior and performance of two all-wheel-drive wagons/hatchbacks -- the 2009 Toyota Matrix and the 2008 Subaru Impreza 2.5i 5-Door -- and finds the Impreza better on all counts.
Review: 2009 Toyota Matrix S AWD vs. 2008 Subaru Impreza 2.5i 5-Door, Edward Niedermeyer, June 16, 2008
Station Wagons Runners Up:
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Canadian Driver…
5 picks including: About.com, FuelEconomy.gov…
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
5 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
4 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, AskMen.com…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Edmunds.com…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
3 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Canadian Driver…
2 picks including: AskMen.com, Car and Driver…
2 picks including: FuelEconomy.gov, Car and Driver…
2 picks including: Business Week, FuelEconomy.gov…

