
- Reviewers say the biggest reason to go with a direct-view CRT is its ability to produce deep, natural blacks and shadow detail -- which remain a challenge for all other TV technologies. Among current CRTs, the Sony FD Trinitron WEGA flat-screen CRT used in the KV-34XBR970 has an almost unbeatable reputation. Sound & Vision magazine notes that the CRT offers "razor-sharp detail" and clearly beats other models in picture quality. But the Sony KV-34XBR970's strengths go beyond its picture tube. The set is also packed with features, including an HDMI input, a QAM-compatible tuner (for watching non-subscription cable HDTV programming), DRC (Digital Reality Creation) signal processing for better standard-definition performance, reverse 3:2 pull down, an extensive menu of adjustments and viewing modes, and a two-year warranty on parts and labor.
- While 34 inches is the largest HDTV CRT screen size currently offered, it's rather small compared to what's available in TVs using other technologies (like plasma and LCD). Despite the modest 34-inch screen size, reviews say the Sony KV-34XBR970's cabinet is massive, measuring 24-inches thick and weighing 190 pounds. Oddly, the Sony TV doesn't have a picture-in-picture feature. As with most HDTVs, reviewers say, its standard-definition performance is only so-so.
The Sony XBR KD-34XBR970 is the consensus pick of professional critics and users as the top conventional (CRT) HDTV. At 34 inches, it's the largest widescreen direct-view HDTV available. The Sony KD-34XBR970 uses Sony's FD Trinitron WEGA flat-screen CRT, which has a good reputation for clarity and quality. The set is also packed with features. The smaller Samsung TXS3082WH (*est. $640), a 30-inch widescreen HDTV, is less expensive and has earned good notices from owners. However, the Samsung's image quality, while good, is said not to be up to the standard of the Sony KD-34XBR970.
As consumer interest in CRT TVs declines, fewer and fewer professional reviewers have been evaluating these sets. One exception is Consumer Reports, which tests 20 CRT TVs, including the Sony XBR KD-34XBR970, in its latest update. The article adheres to Consumer Reports' high standards, though there isn't much in the way of discussion about individual TVs. Another source, The Perfect Vision, generally does a good job reviewing TVs and other home-entertainment gear, but its evaluation of the Sony KD-34XBR970 is primarily based on an earlier version of this TV, which differs substantially from the current model. Meanwhile, Consumer Guide's evaluation seems to be based on Sony's marketing copy, with no indication that anyone has actually seen -- let alone tested -- the TV. The Sony KD-34XBR970 also receives a fair amount of user feedback at sites like Amazon.com, Circuit City.com and AVSForum.com.
Our Sources
1. ConsumerReports.org
Consumer Reports is one of the few sources that still tests CRT televisions. This latest roundup evaluates eight high-definition sets and 12 standard-definition models. Along with general buying advice, the magazine provides a ratings chart. The discussions about individual TVs are disappointingly short, but the ratings are updated regularly.
Review: Conventional TVs, Editors of Consumer Reports, Nov. 2006
2. ConsumerReports.org
Consumer Reports is one of the few sources that still tests CRT televisions. This latest roundup evaluates eight high-definition sets and 12 standard-definition models. Along with general buying advice, the magazine provides a ratings chart. The discussions about individual TVs are disappointingly short, but the ratings are updated regularly.
Review: Conventional TVs, Editors of Consumer Reports, Nov. 2006
3. The Perfect Vision
The Perfect Vision only rarely covers CRT TVs these days, but it saw fit to bestow an Editors' Choice award on the Sony KV-34XBR970. That designation, however, has been made largely on The Perfect Vision's review of the Sony KV-34XBR970's predecessor, the KV-34XBR960. That said, the magazine reports that the newer Sony has the same resolution as the earlier model, along with great natural blacks and shadow detail.
Review: 2006 The Perfect Vision EditorsÂ’ Choice Awards, Editors of The Perfect Vision

