
- Doesn't need much computing power
- Needs just 500 MB of hard-drive space
- There's a Mac version
- Mistakes are not easy to correct
- Not as accurate as Dragon NaturallySpeaking
- Has not been updated recently
Our Sources
1. Digital Bits
Andy Kaiser, a computer consultant and technology columnist, compares and contrasts the current version of IBM ViaVoice with the then-new version of Dragon NaturallySpeaking and recommends the latter. He speculates that ScanSoft (now Nuance) is continuing to improve Dragon but won't update ViaVoice.
Review: Voice Recognition Software Review: Dragon NaturallySpeaking 8.0 and IBM ViaVoice 10, Andy Kaiser, Not Dated
2. CNET
This review is old enough that CNET has removed all but the three-star rating (out of five) from its website, and a brief capsule exists on its sister website, ZDNet.com. The bottom line is that ViaVoice is "buggy." Dragon NaturallySpeaking is recommended instead.
Review: Reviews of the IBM ViaVoice Standard Edition 10 (Windows), Editors of CNET, Feb. 23, 2006
3. Small Business Computing.com
Reviewer Gerry Blackwell doesn't compare ViaVoice to any other product. He describes training the program as "tedious" and says it didn't work very well for him.
Review: ViaVoice 10 Review: Patience Is a Virtue, Gerry Blackwell, March 17, 2003



