When you're buying a new washing machine, the first decision you need to make is whether to buy a top loader or a front loader. Top loaders are easier to load and unload than front-loading machines (since you don't have to stoop over to open them), and they cost an average of $300 less than top loaders. Traditional top-loading washers, which use an internal agitator that spins on a vertical axis to churn the water and clean the laundry, are the least expensive type. However, they cost more to run because they use more water and electricity than high-efficiency models. They also hold less laundry, make more noise and get lower scores (often vastly lower) in professional tests.
If you prefer a top-loading washing machine, sources indicate that an energy-efficient top loader is a sound choice. These washers use less water and energy than conventional top loaders, but they get higher marks for washing performance in independent tests. While some of these washers still use a traditional agitator design, most use different cleaning mechanisms. One common alternative to an agitator is an impeller -- a fan-shaped ridge at the bottom of the washer drum that spins to create turbulence and somersault laundry through the water. However, these mechanisms can also tangle clothes more easily than a traditional agitator. Energy-efficient top loaders are also more expensive than conventional washers, with prices that rival those of front loaders.
Front-loading washing machines earn numerous recommendations because they have the best washing performance overall while using the least water and energy. Their horizontal tubs tumble clothes into and out of the water, making it possible to wash a full load without filling the tub completely. On average, front loaders tend to be gentler on clothes than top-loading machines, as well as more efficient. Front-loading washers can be stacked with a matching dryer to save space, and their higher spin speeds wring out more water, so laundry requires less time in the dryer.
However, front loaders have their own set of downsides. The most common complaint: Rubber seals on the doors of these machines can trap water, dirt and detergent, creating an ideal environment for mold growth. However, many owners say that they have successfully avoided mold and mildew problems by following the advice of experts to wipe down the rubber seal after each wash and leave the washer door open when not in use. Another common problem is lengthy wash times -- anywhere from 50 to 100 minutes for a standard wash cycle, compared to 35 to 60 minutes in a top loader. The high spin speeds of front-loading machines may cause excessive vibration, especially on wooden floors. Also, because front loaders use less water, they require high-efficiency (HE) detergent, which produces fewer suds. Washing with regular detergent may cause a residue build-up inside the washer and on the rubber seal that exacerbates or encourages mold and mildew growth.
Another factor to consider when choosing a washer is its operating costs -- mainly electricity and water use. One well-known form of certification for energy-efficient consumer products is a government program called Energy Star. According to EnergyStar.gov, Energy Star-compliant washers are 37 percent more efficient than standard washers. Energy Star ratings are based on two statistics:
Both the MEF and the Water Factor of a washing machine are listed on the yellow EnergyGuide label in the store. You can also check a product's rating at EnergyStar.gov. We have listed the MEF and Water Factor for each of our Best Reviewed washing machines in the comparison chart.
Experts say the following about choosing a washer:
When you're buying a new washing machine, the first decision you need to make is whether to buy a top loader or a front loader. Top loaders are easier to load and unload than front-loading machines (since you don't have to stoop over to open them), and they cost an average of $300 less than top loaders. Traditional top-loading washers, which use an internal agitator that spins on a vertical axis to churn the water and clean the laundry, are the least expensive type. However, they cost more to run because they use more water and electricity than high-efficiency models. They also hold less laundry, make more noise and get lower scores (often vastly lower) in professional tests.
If you prefer a top-loading washing machine, sources indicate that an energy-efficient top loader is a sound choice. These washers use less water and energy than conventional top loaders, but they get higher marks for washing performance in independent tests. While some of these washers still use a traditional agitator design, most use different cleaning mechanisms. One common alternative to an agitator is an impeller -- a fan-shaped ridge at the bottom of the washer drum that spins to create turbulence and somersault laundry through the water. However, these mechanisms can also tangle clothes more easily than a traditional agitator. Energy-efficient top loaders are also more expensive than conventional washers, with prices that rival those of front loaders.
Front-loading washing machines earn numerous recommendations because they have the best washing performance overall while using the least water and energy. Their horizontal tubs tumble clothes into and out of the water, making it possible to wash a full load without filling the tub completely. On average, front loaders tend to be gentler on clothes than top-loading machines, as well as more efficient. Front-loading washers can be stacked with a matching dryer to save space, and their higher spin speeds wring out more water, so laundry requires less time in the dryer.
However, front loaders have their own set of downsides. The most common complaint: Rubber seals on the doors of these machines can trap water, dirt and detergent, creating an ideal environment for mold growth. However, many owners say that they have successfully avoided mold and mildew problems by following the advice of experts to wipe down the rubber seal after each wash and leave the washer door open when not in use. Another common problem is lengthy wash times -- anywhere from 50 to 100 minutes for a standard wash cycle, compared to 35 to 60 minutes in a top loader. The high spin speeds of front-loading machines may cause excessive vibration, especially on wooden floors. Also, because front loaders use less water, they require high-efficiency (HE) detergent, which produces fewer suds. Washing with regular detergent may cause a residue build-up inside the washer and on the rubber seal that exacerbates or encourages mold and mildew growth.
Another factor to consider when choosing a washer is its operating costs -- mainly electricity and water use. One well-known form of certification for energy-efficient consumer products is a government program called Energy Star. According to EnergyStar.gov, Energy Star-compliant washers are 37 percent more efficient than standard washers. Energy Star ratings are based on two statistics:
Both the MEF and the Water Factor of a washing machine are listed on the yellow EnergyGuide label in the store. You can also check a product's rating at EnergyStar.gov. We have listed the MEF and Water Factor for each of our Best Reviewed washing machines in the comparison chart.
Experts say the following about choosing a washer:
|
Sponsored Links are keyword-targeted advertisements provided through the Google AdWords™ program. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by Google. For information about these Google ads, go to adwords.google.com. Google may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your Web browser. Information from this cookie may be used by Google to help provide advertisers with more targeted advertising opportunities. For more information about Google's privacy policy, including how to opt out, go to www.google.com/ads/preferences. By clicking on Sponsored Links you will leave ConsumerSearch.com. The web site you will go to is not endorsed by ConsumerSearch. |