
Faucet-mounted water filter
- Easy installation
- Unlimited filtered water
- Filters more contaminants than most
- Excellent water taste
- Many reports of leaks
- Filters can clog fast
- Slow flow rate
- Filter changing awkward
January 2009. Although faucet-mounted water filters are more convenient than pitcher-style filters, and filter out more contaminants, we found a lot more complaints about this style -- especially about leaks. However, the 3-stage PUR FM-9400, along with other PUR faucet filters, earns high marks for filtering out many more contaminants than competing models. Independent tests show it filters out 99 percent of pharmaceuticals. This filter is also easy to install and earns top ranking when it comes to water taste. It's easy to switch between filtered and unfiltered water. If you don't need to filter out 30 contaminants, consider the Culligan FM-15A Faucet Filter (*est. $18), which gets better ratings for durability.
We found the best comparison test of the PUR FM-9400 faucet-mount water filter at Consumer Reports, where it's rated and ranked along with 26 other filters, including three other faucet water filters. Good Housekeeping tests a PUR faucet-mounted filter for even more contaminants, but it's not clear which model is covered -- though they all use a three-stage filter. A Canadian site, Shopping Bags, also uses lab tests but finds taste comparisons the deciding factor. National Geographic's The Green Guide recommends the PUR FM-9400 based primarily on certification data from the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF), while reviews at Consumer Guide, TheKitchn.com and ApartmentTherapy.com emphasize convenience and water taste. We found over 100 owner-written reviews of the PUR FM-9400 faucet filter at Amazon.com, with some of the complaints documented by two videos published at YouTube.
Our Sources
1. ConsumerReports.org
Based on objective tests, editors rank the PUR FM9400 in comparison with three other faucet-mounted water filters and 23 additional water filters of other types. Ratings include how well each model removes bad tastes, lead and chloroform (as an indicator of ability to remove other organic compounds as well).
Review: Water Filters, Editors of Consumer Reports, May 2007
2. Good HousekeepingDetails/Subscribe
This review recommends the PUR faucet-mounted water filters despite the fact that the flow rate is slower than that of a Culligan filter. Both brands produce water that tastes good, but the PUR filters out far more contaminants -- which editors here find much more important than flow rate.
Review: GH on TV: Water Filters, Editors of Good Housekeeping
Lab tests done for this review find all four of the water filters adequate for removing metals and even some coliform bacteria, so informal taste tests become the deciding factor. The PUR faucet-mounted water filter (and PUR pitcher) get the most votes for the best tasting water.
Review: Water Purifiers, Kristina Matisic and Anna Wallner, Nov. 2007
Water Filters Runners Up:
4 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
2 picks by top review sites.
|
Brita 42633 Faucet Filtration System, Black/Chrome
from Amazon.com New: $21.99 In Stock.
Average Customer Review: |
||
|
|
|
Sprite Industries HO-WH Shower Filter Classic White
from Amazon.com New: $34.88 In Stock.
Average Customer Review: |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Aquasana Whole House Water Filtration System - Rhino Model
from Amazon.com New: $799.20 In Stock.
Average Customer Review: |
||
|
|




