|
|
Mac vs. PCYou are here: Computers >> Apple Laptops and DesktopsUpdated February 2008
In this report:
Mac vs. PCReviewers and pundits hotly debate the relative value of a Macintosh versus a PC. Now that all Macs can run Windows (since they now use Intel chips), it's no longer entirely an apples-to-oranges comparison. However, the Mac OS will only run on a Macintosh computer, which still gives the product line uniqueness. The problem with the arguments we found is that either they just compared hardware, or concluded that Macs cost more but are worth it because they are better. Two programs, Apple's free Boot Camp and Parallels Desktop 3.0 for Mac (*est. $70), allow Mac users to run both Mac OS X and Windows on the same Apple computer. Most reviewers say Parallels works better and faster. If you are considering a Mac as a Windows computer, it will be much more expensive. You need to buy a full edition of Windows software (*est. $190 and up, depending on version) in addition to the cost of the computer, and possibly Parallels Desktop. Apple does not offer Windows as a pre-installed option, but dealers might. Of course, running Windows on a Macintosh is cheaper than buying two computers. With a laptop, it can be more convenient, too. If you’re torn between a Macintosh and its seamless hardware/software integration and the universality of Windows, you can have your cake and eat it too, albeit at a steep price. Review tests indicate that Windows can run just as fast on a Mac as on a comparable PC. Experts note that emotion weighs heavily when considering Apple computers. This company has a loyal following unrivaled in the industry. Proponents say that Apple's tight software integration and lack of security problems are enough to propel it past any Windows-based laptop. Style also figures into the equation. On a purely clinical level, a Windows computer is nearly always the better value, but many people are happy to pay more for a Macintosh. We attempted a few price comparisons. For example, Dell makes an all-in-one computer with a 20-inch widescreen display. It is not customizable, so we couldn’t make a direct comparison, but the base model (*est. $1,300) has the same CPU and hard drive as the base iMac (*est. $1,200). The Dell has 2 GB of RAM (instead of 1 GB on the iMac) and a TV tuner, but the Dell has integrated video instead of a graphics card. Software packages have comparable value. On balance, we would say the cost of purchasing either computer is equal. If you try to compare an iMac with a standard Windows desktop PC of comparable specs, however, you'd spend much less on a PC. For example, the Dell Inspiron (*est. $900) is radically cheaper than the 2.4 GHz 20-inch iMac (starting at *est. $1,500) . The prices are based on the same speed CPU, the same amount of RAM and video RAM, the same size and speed hard drive and a 20-inch display. You can easily perform these kinds of comparisons yourself. Still, the uniqueness of the Macintosh operating system makes value hard to quantify. Some people need Macs. The Mac OS is superior to Windows for several types of uses. Those include graphic design, desktop publishing (because Macs have flawless WYSIWYG [what-you-see-is-what-you-get] printing capability), music production and certain sciences. Some programs, such as Adobe Photoshop, have historically run better under the Mac OS, but ran slower on early Intel-based Macs. Reviews indicate that the hardware and software have now caught up with each other. At one time, the Mac OS was much easier to use than Windows (and before that, DOS). Windows 95 closed that gap by largely copying the Macintosh graphical user interface. Subsequent versions of Windows have made incremental improvements in ease of use, while Mac OS X was a major departure from previous Macintosh operating systems. For people who already know one system, but haven’t used the other, the known system is easier to use. However, few people have difficulty switching in either direction these days. The learning curve is not steep. In nearly every review of Apple computers, reviewers dote on appearance. Reviewers and consumers are swayed by the look and feel of Mac desktops and laptops, and aesthetics are addressed as a major buying consideration. Cost of use is another issue. With Apple adopting PC standards like IDE, SATA and USB, and using Intel processors, Macs have fewer proprietary parts than they used to have. However, the cost of Macintosh service and repairs still extends beyond the purchase price. For instance, if the optical drive in an iMac or mini dies, owners must pay for Apple’s proprietary replacement parts or buy an expensive external DVD burner. Because the internal drives are built into the chassis, they aren’t user-replaceable parts. Apple’s own extended warranty, the AppleCare Protection Plan, is the most expensive in the industry. Important FeaturesReviewers say the following about shopping for an Apple laptop or desktop computer:
Our Consensus Report shows how many times products are top-ranked by reviewers included in our * Also see our Comparison Chart.
The chart only includes Apple computers that are recommended by reviewers that rate one or two Mac models higher than other models. Even so, the chart can be somewhat misleading, as not all reviewers review all Macintosh computers. Those who review both the MacBook Pro and the MacBook generally express a clear preference for the Pro. The price jump is huge, as reviewers acknowledge, but several reviewers argue that the Pro is a better value. Price and performance aren’t the only distinctions between the MacBook Pro and the MacBook. The Pro also has larger displays. Reviewers say the two 15-inch MacBook Pro laptops (actual 15.4-inch displays) are a better value than the 17-inch version. The brand new MacBook Air is already widely reviewed. Reviewers love the idea, appearance and easy portability, but say it isn’t a very useful computer, especially relative to its price (starting at *est. $1,800). For desktop buyers, the Mac Pro is recommended in reviews, but it is considered an expensive, high-end professional computer. At the opposite extreme in the desktop line, the Mac mini receives lukewarm reviews. It’s generally recommended because it is the only sub-$1,000 Macintosh, but considered a mediocre value and too limited for many uses. The two iMac models fall between the extremes. Several reviewers consider these all-in-one machines to be the perfect desktop computers for many people. The two 20-inch models are reviewed more often than the two 24-inch models. Those who review both usually prefer the 24-inch model because the display has a wider viewing angle. Advertisement -- report continues below
PCs running Windows or Linux are the obvious alternatives to Macs. See our reports on PC desktop computers , budget desktop computers , laptop computers and cheap laptops for buying choices and specific recommendations. Ars Technica and other sources are reporting rumors that the MacBook line will be revised soon. New models could be announced in the very near future, they say. The entire computer industry has received considerable criticism from environmental groups, and until recently, Apple was considered one of the worst offenders. The company has responded to critics, and it introduced a new environmental policy in May 2007. Greenpeace says, "Apple has finally moved off the bottom of the scorecard and is now in 10th position with improvements on many criteria. The company has committed to eliminate all uses of PVC and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) in their products by the end of 2008." According to its most recent report, Greenpeace notes that Apple products still use PVC mercury and BFRs, and the LCD displays contain arsenic. Note that some of the issues that irk environmentalists are with non-computer products (e.g. iPod batteries that aren’t user-replaceable and toxic chemicals in iPhones). Packaging and recycling are other issues with computers. A coalition of more than 70 environmental and consumer groups (including the Computer TakeBack Campaign, Clean Water Action and Consumers Union) petitioned Al Gore to take a leadership role in changing Apple’s environmental policies. The former Vice President is a member of Apple’s board of directors. These resources will cover or lead you to everything you need to know about Apple and Macintosh computers. Apple’s website is a less-than-complete source of information about specific models, but still the best starting point. Ars Technica is an excellent source for Mac-related news. This Macworld article, "The MacBook Air: What you need to know," by Peter Cohen, Dan Frakes, Jonathan Seff, Dan Miller and Jason Snell (January 18, 2008) is comprehensive. The TWICE (This Week in Consumer Electronics) column, "Genius Loves Company," is an interesting story by Stewart Wolpin about both Macintosh reliability and service provided by Macintosh enthusiasts (January 23, 2008). Guardian columnist Charlie Brooker writes a diatribe, "I hate Macs" (February 5, 2007). Hundreds of readers on both sides of the issue respond (useful for people debating between platforms). . Low End Mac is a wonderful information and link resource. iFixit.com offers free Macintosh repair guides. AnandTech’s Mac coverage has become sporadic, but articles are informative. ATPM (About This Particular Macintosh) is a monthly e-zine with news, features and reviews of third-party products. The MacRumors Buyer's Guide has a list of current models and when and how they were last updated. Tom's Hardware articles, "Apple iMac Display Problems Reported" (November 27, 2007), and "Apple Censorship: This Time It's Displays" (December 19, 2007) report problems with 20-inch iMac displays. AppleDefects.com is devoted to customer complaints and issues. The Apple Core is a ZDNet blog with up-to-date news and speculation. MacReviewZone has links to reviews of hardware and software products. A NotebookCheck.net article, "Notebook versus Desktop PC" (April 2007) is helpful. Computer Shopper has the best, most practical and easiest-to-understand guide to Centrino Duo, "A Guide to Intel's Santa Rosa Platform for Laptops." CNet’s Crave has a helpful article, "Centrino Duo (aka Santa Rosa) explained" by Michelle Thatcher. Intel Centrino Duo Processor Technology. The May 3, 2007 Wall Street Journal article, "Buying a Laptop Means More Attention to Special Features" by Walter S. Mossberg covers future (now current) buying considerations, including a brief PC vs. Mac comparison. A Computerworld article, "MacBook Air has issues, says Apple" (February 4, 2008) is interesting. Advertisement
Apple Laptops and Desktops Reviews |
|
||||||