Projection TV Reviews

Google
  Web ConsumerSearch.com   
Reviewing the Reviews Home Category Index Shop Newsletter Search About Us

Projection TV Reviews

Updated November 2007

Best Projection TV Reviews: (out of 16)
CNet.com, The Perfect Vision, Consumer Reports

Best Projection TV: (out of 60)
Sony Grand WEGA KDS-60A3000, Sony Grand WEGA KDS-55A3000, Samsung HL-T5687S

Fast Answers - Best Projection TV
Top Rated What the Research Says
•  Sony Grand WEGA KDS-60A3000
   (*est. $2,100)

>> Where to buy

Best 60-inch rear-projection HDTV.

The 60-inch Sony KDS-60A3000 strikes the best blend of excellent, high-resolution 1080p image quality and price, and it uses what critics consider the best rear-projection technology right now: LCoS (Sony calls their version SXRD). Reviews say HD images have terrific detail, good color and deep, rich blacks. Reviewers especially like Sony's automatic iris adjustment, which varies light output based on content. This brightens the image for outdoor scenes and sports, and it will automatically drop brightness for movies and darker scenes.
•  Sony Grand WEGA KDS-55A3000
   (*est. $1,900)

>> Where to buy

Best 55-inch projection HDTV.

Like its 60-inch big brother, the 55-inch Sony KDS-55A3000 lacks some bells-and-whistles -- such as picture-in-picture, for example -- but delivers great picture quality, with deep, rich blacks. In addition, the Sony KDS-55A3000 -- and all of Sony's A3000-series HDTVs -- has a new, slimmer cabinet depth and circuitry that adjusts the signal processing to best match an input signal for smoothest display.The Sony KDS-55A3000 also has an automatic iris function that adjusts light output to compensate for ambient room lighting.
•  Samsung HL-T5687S
   (*est. $2,000)

>> Where to buy

56-inch DLP projection TV.

While the 56-inch Samsung HL-T5687S projection generally scores a notch behind Sony, the Samsung TV has a couple of advantages, notably a long-life bulb that's supposed to last 20,000 hours, at least 50% longer than bulbs. That means less expense and hassle down the road. Samsung uses LED lights instead of a spinning color wheel. This eliminates or reduces the two biggest drawbacks with DLP technology -- limited bulb life and rainbow effect. Most reports add that that the TV has great blacks, accurate colors and the ability to display great detail, but it also has some screen uniformity problems (bright spots). One neat extra is the ability to display 2D material from a computer in 3D with the aid of an extra-cost kit (*est. $150). (compare prices)
•  Samsung HL-T5075S
   (*est. $1,150)

>> Where to buy

Budget 50-inch DLP HDTV.

The Samsung HL-T5075S uses 720p resolution -- lower than the 1080p resolution found in most other rear-projection TVs. Critics say that in a smaller screen size, 720p isn't that distinguishable from 1080p, and that otherwise, this Samsung RPTV stands up well with great black levels and colors. Still, if you are considering a TV in this price range, you should also consider plasma, which will cost a bit more but has the advantage of a lighter weight and a flat screen. (compare prices)
>>  Comparison Chart

Full Story
What the experts say, our analysis, and more...
Updated November 2007

While flat-panel plasma and LCD televisions are proving much more popular, reviews say you get the most HDTV for your money with a rear-projection TV. DLP (Digital Light Processing) and LCoS (Liquid Crystal on Silicon) projection TVs have now taken over the market from LCD and the even older CRT-type rear-projection televisions. These microdisplay TVs have big screens of up to 73 inches, but they are shallower and far less bulky than CRT televisions. The latest rear-projection TVs are using new technology to make them thinner still; some measure less than 12 inches in depth. While 12 inches is significantly thicker than a plasma screen, a big-screen rear-projection TV can cost substantially less than a plasma TV or LCD TV of the same size.

In general, the best source for rear projection TV (RPTV) reviews is CNet.com. Sets are reviewed as they come to market, and the reports are balanced and detailed. The sets deemed best are included in an Editors' Top TVs list. Another good place for rear-projection TV reviews is Consumer Reports magazine. However, while the magazine actually tests and reviews more RPTVs than CNet, the individual reviews are disappointingly short -- typically no more than a sentence or two. In addition, lead times are longer than CNet, and the magazine's most recent update -- published in June -- is already out of date. On the positive side, the testing and the ratings are competently and fairly done, and it is easy to see which TVs score the best in the eyes of the editors.

Sound and Vision magazine, The Perfect Vision, Home Theater magazine and Ultimate AV magazine also do a good job covering rear-projection TVs. While they don't review nearly as many TVs as CNet.com or Consumer Reports, the articles they produce are usually richly detailed and very comprehensive.

We've split our television category into several separate reports. This one focuses on rear-projection TVs, which have large screens and cheaper price tags than same size flat-screen plasma TVs or LCD TVs . Another report addresses conventional tube-based TVs . If you are looking for the biggest images of all, see our report on front projectors . Our last report, HDTV , tackles high-definition technology in more depth and recaps the choices in HDTVs.

While microdisplay technologies (so named because they are smaller than older CRT-based sets) are relatively new, most sets reaching the market today are strong performers. That's especially true of the new 1080p sets -- reviews say even the worst of these super-high-resolution sets put lower resolution models to shame when it comes to image quality.

Though still less expensive than LCD or plasma TVs -- especially in larger screen sizes -- rear-projection TVs are losing market share to plasma and LCD, and some manufacturers are pulling out altogether. Recently, Toshiba announced that they have discontinued all of their rear-projection TVs and are now exclusively making flat-screen LCD televisions. To remain competitive, manufacturers are slimming down their rear-projection sets, with some screen sizes coming in at less than a foot in depth. One example is the JVC HD-58S998 (*est. $2,200) , an LCoS (liquid crystal on silicon) based rear-projection TV that only measures about 11 inches deep.

Critics are wowed by the overall picture quality and shallow cabinet depth, but reviewers who've tested the JVC television also report one significant shortcoming: lines that bend or bow instead of being perfectly straight. David Katzmaier at CNet.com seems to sum up the consensus when he writes: "although it had a hard time keeping a straight line, the JVC HD-58S998 gives solid picture quality."

The JVC HD-58S998 is a victim of physics. It is the slimmest of the new slim-depth RPTVs, and the job of getting the optics just right in such a shallow cabinet depth is a challenge. According to CNet.com, JVC says that the set's optics includes a concave mirror, and that's the source of the errors. Other reviewers have also reported the bending lines -- most noticeable when observing a programming grid or crawler, though they also become obvious in the black bars generated by letterboxed or 4:3 programming. Some, but not all, experts are willing to forgive this defect in light for how great the image looks otherwise and the slim-depth form factor. Also, the JVC HD-58S998 isn't the only rear-projection TV to suffer geometry problems -- in fact, many other slim-depth RPTVs exhibit it as well, according to reports. It is just that few seem to have it as frequently or severely as this JVC rear-projection HDTV.  ... Continued

Consensus Report

Our Consensus Report shows how many times products are top-ranked by reviewers included in our
All The Reviews Reviewed chart.

# of Picks Model (with retailer links) Details from Amazon.com
5 Sony KDS-R60XBR2 (LCoS) (*est. $3,400) -
3 Samsung HL-T5687S (DLP) (*est. $2,200) details
2 Samsung HL-T5687S (DLP) (*est. $2,000) details
2 Samsung HL-T6187S (DLP) (*est. $2,300) details
2 Sony KDS-55A2020 (LCoS) (*est. $2,200) -
1 each DLP:
Mitsubishi WD-65734 , NuVision 52LEDLP, Mitsubishi WD-57831, Samsung HL-T5075S
LCoS:
Syntax-Brillian 6580iFB031, Sony KDS-55A3000, Sony KDS-60A3000, Sony KDS-50A3000
LCD:
Sony KDF-37H1000 , Sony KDF-50E3000 , Sony KDF-46E3000 , Panasonic PT-56LCZ70

We found the best reviews for sets that use LCoS technology, particularly Sony's KDS-R60XBR2 rear-projection TV. However, that model is very expensive and is now being phased out. Sony's latest LCoS rear-projection TVs, including the Sony KDS-60A3000, KDS-55A3000 and KDS-50A3000 deliver the same great picture quality, and have a slimmer cabinet depth but fewer features. JVC's latest LCoS RPTVs have great picture quality as well, but several reviewers are critical of their inability to properly display straight lines. Among DLP sets, Samsung's LED-illuminated HL-T5687S is not perfect, but is still a great performer that goes a long way in addressing two important DLP projector shortcomings -- rainbow effect and lamp life. The Samsung HL-T5075S is only 720p, but it's a great budget choice. Panasonic's new LCD rear-projection TVs, including the PT-56LCZ70, use a new type of bulb that might never need replacing, but are expensive.

Advertisement
Projection TV Reviews