Smoke Detectors Reviews

Google
  Web ConsumerSearch.com   
Reviewing the Reviews Home Category Index Shop Newsletter Search About Us

Smoke Detectors Reviews

Updated January 2008

Best Smoke Detectors Reviews: (out of 6)
Consumer.org.nz, Consumer Reports, Amazon.com

Best Smoke Detectors: (out of 40)
First Alert Dual Sensor Remote Control Smoke Alarm SA302CN, First Alert 10-year Smoke Alarm with Lithium Battery SA340CN, First Alert Smoke Alarm with Photoelectric Sensor SA710CN

Fast Answers - Best Smoke Detectors
Top Rated What the Research Says
•  First Alert Dual Sensor Remote Control Smoke Alarm SA302CN
   (*est. $25)

>> Where to buy

Best all-around smoke detector.

In reviews, experts consistently point to the First Alert Dual Sensor as the best smoke detector. It runs on a replaceable 9-volt battery and features a combination ionization and photoelectric sensor that is by far the most accurate and effective detection method available. The SA302CN has extra features that many detectors do not, such as remote-controlled alarm silence and test, Intelligent Sensing, which differentiates non-threatening conditions (i.e. kitchen smoke) from real emergencies, and an automatic daily self-check test. This model has a 10-year warranty. One downside is that some owners say you can accidentally trigger the test function with your TV's remote control, so it may take some trial and error to get the right placement. (compare prices)
•  First Alert 10-year Smoke Alarm with Lithium Battery SA340CN
   (*est. $30)

>> Where to buy

Ionization smoke detector.

This unit features a 10-year non-replaceable lithium battery, which spares you from changing a battery each year (as with the First Alert SA302CN above and most other battery-powered detectors), but this smoke alarm has only an ionization sensor, so it’s less effective at detecting smoky, smoldering fires. Reviews say this is a good choice if you want a detector with a very long battery life, but since it lacks a dual sensor, it is best used with a photoelectric detector. The cost of a second detector can eat up the savings from not having to replace the batteries in this unit. (compare prices)
•  First Alert Smoke Alarm with Photoelectric Sensor SA710CN
   (*est. $25)

>> Where to buy

Photoelectric smoke detector.

This photoelectric smoke detector is better at detecting smoky or smoldering fires than the ionization unit above. Since photoelectric technology is not good at detecting fast burning fires, it should be used in combination with an ionization detector. This unit also requires yearly battery replacement but, like other First Alert detectors, it has a limited 10-year warranty. (compare prices)
•  Kidde Basic 0914
   (*est. $7)

>> Where to buy

Budget smoke detector.

While this no-frills ionization model is good at detecting high-flame fires, it is less adept at sensing smoky fires, such as those caused by smoldering bedding. That’s why ionization smoke detectors are not the best choice for bedrooms. Experts prefer models such as the First Alert Dual Sensor, which has both an ionization detector and a photoelectric sensor for detecting slow, smoldering blazes. (compare prices)
•  KidSmart Vocal Smoke Detector
   (*est. $70)

>> Where to buy

Smoke detector for homes with children.

Studies show that children often sleep through a normal smoke detector's alarm -- or else they respond so slowly that they cannot escape the house within the critical 2-minute time window. The KidSmart is a photoelectric detector that allows parents to record a message in their own voice. Research has proven that children are much more likely to respond quickly to a parent's voice, and the majority of kids in tests were awake and moving within seconds of the KidSmart's alarm. Since this model is photoelectric only, you'll also want to install ionization alarms. (compare prices)
>>  Comparison Chart

Full Story
What the experts say, our analysis, and more...
Updated January 2008

Consumer.org -- a New Zealand-based research organization -- has the most credible smoke detector review we were able to find. Smoke alarms are rated according to speed in detecting both kinds of blazes. Consumer.org editors test 21 smoke detectors, testing three samples of each model for accuracy in both high-flaming fires (the kind often fueled by paper or flammable liquids) and smoky fires (often involving slow-smoldering bedding, clothing and upholstery). The detectors are mounted in a mock hallway testing environment and fires are started in an adjacent room. Top picks are chosen based on response time and accuracy. Other experts don't test as many models, while others don't recommend specific smoke detectors at all.

Consumer Reports hasn't tested smoke detectors extensively for several years, although it does have a recently updated informative article that covers the types of smoke detectors available, along with some casual recommendations. However, this article falls short of Consumer Reports usually detailed testing and ratings charts. We found helpful owner-written ratings at Amazon.com. Owners are in a unique position to document annoying habits of smoke detectors -- like late-night false alarms, annoying chirps or poor battery life.

All reviewers agree on one thing: The best smoke alarms can sense both types of fires (high-flaming and smoky) with equal effectiveness, and that means buying a smoke alarm with both an ionization sensor for flames and a photoelectric sensor for smoke or using two separate smoke alarms to achieve the highest safety levels.

The cheapest models on store shelves are ionization smoke detectors, such as the Kidde Basic 0914 (*est. $7) and First Alert SA310CN3 (*est. $13) . In testing, inexpensive ionization alarms such as these perform well sensing high-flaming fires, but score poorly on smoky fires. While these may be a fine choice for a supplementary alarm, perhaps in a localized area where flaming fires are more likely (such as areas where flammable liquids are stored), experts say you should also install a photoelectric smoke alarm, which detects smoky fires. Photoelectric alarms are more expensive than ionization alarms -- you can expect to pay around $30. An even better choice are dual-detection smoke alarms, which have both technologies and often cost less than buying separate smoke detectors.

With this specific consideration in mind, reviews say the First Alert Dual Sensor SA302CN (*est. $25) , which is equipped with both ionization and photoelectric sensors, is the safest and most accurate smoke detector you can buy. This First Alert smoke alarm includes a test function and 85-decibel alarm. The First Alert smoke detector has a 10-year warranty with added consumer-friendly features, but requires battery replacement at least yearly. Public-service campaigns have popularized the idea of changing your smoke detector battery when you change your clocks each spring for daylight savings.

In owner reviews, the First Alert SA302CN is well rated overall, but users report some annoyances. This First Alert smoke detector includes a unique test function -- rather than climbing on a chair or ladder to test this smoke alarm, you can activate the test feature with any standard television remote control. That feature is handy, but users report some unintended side effects -- including accidentally triggering the test feature when watching television. For that reason, it may take some experimentation to find the right placement for this unit.  ... Continued

Consensus Report

Our Consensus Report shows how many times products are top-ranked by reviewers included in our
All The Reviews Reviewed chart.

# of Picks Model (With Retailer Links) Details from Amazon.com
3 First Alert Dual Sensor SA302CN (*est. $25) details
2 First Alert SA340CN (*est. $30) details
1 each First Alert SA710CN , Family Guard FG888DCAUS, Kidde Basic , Kidde 0914 , Kidde 0910 , Kidde PI9000 , Kidde PI2000 , KidSmart Vocal Smoke Alarm

Safety experts most often recommend dual-sensor smoke detectors like the First Alert Dual Sensor SA302CN. The First Alert SA340CN uses a non-replaceable 10-year lithium battery and a photoelectric sensor that detects smoke well, but doesn’t detect flames as quickly as a dual detector or ionization model. The other options all offer benefits, but have not been as widely tested or recommended. The KidSmart Vocal Smoke Alarm has been widely acclaimed by experts, but has not been tested in any simulated or controlled fire situations that we could find.

Advertisement
Smoke Detectors Reviews