Running Shoes Reviews

Google
  Web ConsumerSearch.com   
Reviewing the Reviews Home Category Index Shop Newsletter Search About Us

Running Shoes Reviews

Updated March 2008

Best Running Shoes Reviews: (out of 11)
Runner's World, British Journal of Sports Medicine, Outside Online

Best Running Shoes: (out of 54)
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 8, New Balance 902, Adidas Supernova Cushion 7

Fast Answers - Best Running Shoes
Top Rated What the Research Says
•  Brooks Adrenaline GTS 8
   (*est. $100)

>> Where to buy

Stability running shoe; Best for most feet.

"Stability" running shoes are best for those with normal arches and neutral to mildly overpronating feet (meaning your feet tend to roll inward a bit when you run). In this category, the best reviews go to the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 8 for both men and women. Experts say it fits especially well in the midfoot and arch, so it feels snug (but not tight), and because it comes in four widths, you're more likely to find a good fit. While not the lightest shoe, the Brooks Adrenaline is more supportive, cushioned and durable than lighter shoes, and they're a good pick for heavier runners. Alternatives in this category include the Asics GEL-Kayano 14 (*est. $140), the Nike Air Zoom Structure Triax 11+ (*est. $100) and the Saucony ProGrid Hurricane 10 (*est. $135). (compare prices)
•  New Balance 902
   (*est. $105)

>> Where to buy

Lightweight stability running shoes.

More competitive runners and lighter runners may prefer a lighter pair of running shoes, which can translate to extra speed. The top-rated New Balance 902 shoes each weigh about 10 ounces -- compares to 12 ounces or more for other stability shoes. Reports say the New Balance shoes employ new, lighter foam types to minimize drag but maximize support and cushioning for those with neutral to slight overpronation. A seamless mesh upper keeps feet cool. Not everyone will like the bright orange (men's) or sky blue (women's) color schemes, but they do come in three widths. An alternative is the Puma Complete Concinnity (*est. $95), which attracts attention for its light 10-ounce weight and asymmetrical lacing system. (compare prices)
•  Adidas Supernova Cushion 7
   (*est. $90)

>> Where to buy

Running shoes for those with neutral to high arches.

Lighter neutral runners and those with high arches don't need much (or any) extra support in the arch. For these types of runners, "neutral cushioning" shoes emphasize all-over cushioning and shock dispersion. According to reviews, the Adidas Supernova Cushion 7 fits especially well in the midsole and arch, and a review in Runner's World says its new overlapping heel plates work to better disperse force on impact. Alternatives in this type of neutral cushioning shoe are the Asics GEL-Nimbus 9 (*est. $125) and the Mizuno Wave Rider 11 (*est. $100). (compare prices)
•  Mizuno Wave Alchemy 7
   (*est. $100)

>> Where to buy

Best motion control running shoe for severe overpronators.

Most runners' feet naturally roll slightly inward when they run in order to absorb shock when the foot hits the ground. However, those with flatter arches tend to roll inward too much, which can contribute to arch and heel pain, Achilles tendonitis and shin splints. Those with mild overpronation can try stability shoes, but those with moderate and severe overpronation should consider motion-control shoes, which have more support to minimize side-to-side foot movement. The Mizuno Wave Alchemy 7 is highlighted in reviews as among the best of this type. (compare prices)
>>  Comparison Chart

Full Story
What the experts say, our analysis, and more...
Updated March 2008

Because running shoes are such an individualized item, well known consumer magazines like Consumer Reports don't review them (although the magazine's editors did cover walking shoes back in 2006). The places for the best research are specialty running magazines and running stores that offer user reviews.

Runner's World offers the best review of 2008 running shoes. In fact, it's hard to beat Runner's World's coverage, period. For the magazine's latest article, 27 new or revised running shoes are tested mechanically and with 350 wear-testers in four cities; each tester wore shoes for a month before delivering a verdict. More running shoes are covered in earlier issues. Runner's World selects a handful of running shoes as Editor's Choice or Best Buy picks, but there's no overall ranking of shoes. They, like all other reviewers, divide the shoes into categories and list a few choices for each, along with any special characteristics each shoe possesses.

Outside magazine also publishes reviews of running shoes, but testing methodology isn't as well documented as it is at Runner's World, and Outside doesn't review nearly as many running shoes. Editors hadn't yet covered 2008 running shoes at the time of our visit, but there's coverage of 2007 shoes and more recent articles on trail runners (covered in our separate ConsumerSearch report on trail-running shoes). Runner's World and Outside magazine don't always test the same shoes, but when they do, it's interesting to compare opinions. RunningTimes.com also posts shoe reviews, mainly written by the same contributor that writes reviews for Outside magazine, Brian Metzler.

User-opinion websites such as Epinions, Rate-it-all, Bizrate and Amazon.com are not as useful for reviews on running shoes. There are just too many types of shoes in the marketplace for each shoe to get an adequate number of reviews on these sites. Moreover, any reviewer is most likely to praise or a pan a particular shoe in isolation, lacking the reference of being able to compare that shoe to similar shoes. As a result, individual shoe reviews by users tend to the extremes -- either positive or negative -- which reiterates the point that one running shoe will not fit everyone. For example, take the Asics GEL-Kayano 14 (*est. $140) , one of Runner's World's 2008 Editor's Choice picks. In Roadrunner Sports' user reviews, there were a string of five-star reviews followed up by a similar string of one-star reviews. Among 20 reviews, one runner comments that he'd never buy Asics again, whereas another writes that this is the best Kayano to date.

A juicer and lawn mower can be graded by how well they do their jobs, regardless of the person using them. A running shoe, however, is graded by how well it does its job relative to the foot of the person wearing it. Choosing a great running shoe for the wrong type of foot will naturally lead to that shoe being panned by an individual reviewer. For that reason, reviewers emphasize that reviews can only take you so far when choosing a running shoe. Reviews can help you narrow the field to a handful of models that might best fit your foot type, but trying out shoes yourself is the only way to judge. Most good running-gear stores will let you run around the store, or better yet, on a treadmill in the store. Clerks at the better stores can be fonts of knowledge, letting you know which shoes have worked best for others with your foot type. Lastly, if you don't have a good running shop nearby, online shoe stores have adopted free return shipping policies so you can exchange shoes without a shipping penalty.  ... Continued

Consensus Report

Our Consensus Report shows how many times products are top-ranked by reviewers included in our
All The Reviews Reviewed chart.

# of picks Model(With Retailer Links) Details from Amazon.com
2 Puma Concinnity (*est. $95) details
2 New Balance 902 (*est. $105) details
1 Brooks Adrenaline GTS 8 (*est. $100) details
1 Asics GEL-Nimbus 9 (*est. $125) details
1 New Balance 710 (*est. $80) details
1 Asics GEL-Kayano 14 (*est. $140) details
1 Mizuno Wave Rider 11 (*est. $100) details
1 Adidas Supernova Cushion 7 (*est. $90) details
1 Nike Air Equalon (*est. $135) details
1 Mizuno Wave Creation 9 (*est. $135) details
1 Puma Complete Eutopia (*est. $125) details
1 Mizuno Wave Alchemy 7 (*est. $100) details

In a topic as subjective as running shoes, finding an absolute best for all runners is impossible. Reviews focus on finding the best shoe based on personal considerations. For the purposes of this report, we looked for shoes that are highly rated in publications that perform shoe tests, including Runner's World and Outside magazine. We then cross-referenced those picks with reviews at Running Times and other magazines and websites that perform less rigorous testing. The running shoes included in ConsumerSearch Fast Answers represent the shoes you should try first, as representatives of their type. They are not the only shoes that deserve consideration.

Advertisement
Running Shoes Reviews